It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Legion2024
reply to post by mainidh
What are they trying to hide...? I think the fact is they just simply don't know.
I say lets send a probe right in to a sunspot and find out
Originally posted by mainidh
Originally posted by Hawking
So parts of these sunspots are less than 100C or 212F?
Really?
Why is no one reading the article? It's all in the article... It's water vapor for a start..
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Originally posted by mainidh
Originally posted by Hawking
So parts of these sunspots are less than 100C or 212F?
Really?
Why is no one reading the article? It's all in the article... It's water vapor for a start..
Agreed. Frustrating as hell to see basic questions asked that are addressed in the article.
And we've got a thread titled "Water found on the sun." In no practical sense whatsoever is that water
1995-05-25 00:00:00
Water found on the sun
University of Waterloo News Bureau
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 6 p.m. EDT May 25, 1995
Originally posted by BohemianBrim
i dont think i can believe that.
Originally posted by Manhater
Originally posted by BohemianBrim
i dont think i can believe that.
Yeah, seriously, I would of found it first.
And with how hot the sun is, it would like totally evaporate.
edit on 17-6-2012 by Manhater because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by VonDoomen
reply to post by tauristercus
So these water molecules may not be directly on the "surface" of the sun. These water molecules may also be buried deep with clouds of matter that they mentioned