It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Genxbeyond
reply to post by GoodOlDave
Please , oh please, your Logic as much as you claim it to be REASON (sucks) Why? because you CANNOT PROVE IT WASNT A MISSLE.... So At the end of the day the year the Century of everyone haveing a Argument or discussion. The point it----------WHERES THE FOOTAGE??? Showing a JET LINER??? I havent see it .
HAVE YOU???? THE ANSWER IS NO. I can hadle the dicussion but your self rightous, anticts are PATHETIC!!!!!
Originally posted by Genxbeyond
reply to post by GoodOlDave
Please , oh please, your Logic as much as you claim it to be REASON (sucks) Why? because you CANNOT PROVE IT WASNT A MISSLE.... So At the end of the day the year the Century of everyone haveing a Argument or discussion. The point it----------WHERES THE FOOTAGE??? Showing a JET LINER??? I havent see it .
HAVE YOU???? THE ANSWER IS NO. I can hadle the dicussion but your self rightous, anticts are PATHETIC!!!!!
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by Genxbeyond
reply to post by GoodOlDave
Please , oh please, your Logic as much as you claim it to be REASON (sucks) Why? because you CANNOT PROVE IT WASNT A MISSLE.... So At the end of the day the year the Century of everyone haveing a Argument or discussion. The point it----------WHERES THE FOOTAGE??? Showing a JET LINER??? I havent see it .
HAVE YOU???? THE ANSWER IS NO. I can hadle the dicussion but your self rightous, anticts are PATHETIC!!!!!
You make it sound as though video footage of airliner crashes is a normal expectation but it isn't. A couple of months after 9/11 AA flight 587 went down in New York. Wher's the footage of that ?
There's a difference between a New York neighborhood and the Pentagon. Come on now, really? You don't see the difference?
Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by homervb
There's a difference between a New York neighborhood and the Pentagon. Come on now, really? You don't see the difference?
In this case there is no difference.
The witnesses saw a passenger airline.
You can't ignore them.
You can't say they are wrong without proof stronger than their word.
There is a term for stead fastly holding to a theory without a shread of proof.
It's called dillusional.edit on 12-4-2012 by samkent because: spelling
And you are the same person to discredit eyewitnesses who reported bombs going off in the WTC, and eyewitnesses at the WTC that said the planes had no windows, and looked like some type of military aircraft. Eyewitness testimony of firefighters who reported secondary explosions way below the point of impact.
Eyewitness testimony is shaky, especially because nobody is waiting for an airplane to crash into the Pentagon.
Originally posted by samkent
Stick to the topic at hand. You are attempting to redirect the conversation because you have no further proof to bolster your argument.
Are you trying to say that "no witness" theories are better than multiple witnesses from different locations seeing the same thing?
That constitutes delusional.
Originally posted by Varemia
reply to post by homervb
Honestly, the issue is that truther witnesses tend to hear explosions during the collapse of a building. None of the truthers ever seem to wonder if explosion could be any number of things during a collapse that are not explosives.
Originally posted by Genxbeyond
reply to post by GenRadek
Helloooooooooooooo, the whole Damn 911 story was faked and made up to create war and money....The pentagon, was just a part of the whole LIE, you have been brainwashed by the goverment controlled media...
Do you ever stop to ask yourself, anything but, " Oh I saw that on the news so IT MUST BE TRUE"
Originally posted by Genxbeyond
reply to post by Varemia
Nope, there are over a half a dozen youtube actuall 911 videos showing and hearing explosions going off. To bad you havent or wanted to see those videos...
Oh sure youd have me believe they were water tanks or gas lines or something...
An O.S. witness tends to see an aircraft hit the pentagon. The problem is an O.S. Trooper automatically assumes the witness is a professional plane spotter with vast knowledge in the visual specs of commercial airliners. This argument works both ways my friend. Reason being why I said eyewitness testimony isnt reliable
Radek and his bunch DO believe, that the Official Government Story on the NEWS is the only one that can be fact, and thus must be proven otherwise, they admit this !!
Originally posted by samkent
An O.S. witness tends to see an aircraft hit the pentagon. The problem is an O.S. Trooper automatically assumes the witness is a professional plane spotter with vast knowledge in the visual specs of commercial airliners. This argument works both ways my friend. Reason being why I said eyewitness testimony isnt reliable
You still have the problem of the orange fireball at the Pentagon.
Missiles don't explode with orange fireballs.
Originally posted by samkent
An O.S. witness tends to see an aircraft hit the pentagon. The problem is an O.S. Trooper automatically assumes the witness is a professional plane spotter with vast knowledge in the visual specs of commercial airliners. This argument works both ways my friend. Reason being why I said eyewitness testimony isnt reliable
You still have the problem of the orange fireball at the Pentagon.
Missiles don't explode with orange fireballs.