It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by XyZeR
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
My premise is not that evolution is not real. Things do evolve for sure. My premise is that evolution is a result and not a cause of results.
Have you ever read your own sentences?
Because you've contradicted yourself thrice now in 3 sentences, ( perhaps a new ATS record?)
and yet you expect us to have a reasonable discussion with you?
An elaborate troll is what you are imho.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
Originally posted by Tiger5
Originally posted by Figzer
This is just a video of some guy who doesn't understand the subtle complexity of evolution. Or DNA, apparently.edit on 20-3-2012 by Figzer because: (no reason given)
Actually this person cannot be a real scientist as he cannot debunk ALL of the evidence in support of evolution in his life time.
Sadly science is now so specialised that the various biological disciplines alone can barely talk to each other.
Sorry Enochwasright both you and Enoch Powell were decidedly Wrong!
And that evidence would be.....? Care to list a few items from science to support the claim that matter can create consciousness?
Originally posted by Deetermined
"A new study finds up to 250 regions where the reference genome sequenced over 13 years may be missing information."
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
That requires movement and thought only. The results are derived from your movement and thought, collapsing the wave of indeterminate probability. If you remove thought and movement, you are not doing what happens around you. You are simply a change agent to the states around you. You didn't actually produce the things around you. You are born with a body. What happens from that point on is choice of yours or others. The choice is governed by law you do not operate. You merely operate within the set law.
The states of matter are never the same twice. Pick up a marker and the electromagnetic radiation from your hand enters the marker and changes its state. Nothing has EVER been in the same state twice. Matter is in constant transition. You need to study classical mechanics and laws of motion to know that no object in existence can be at rest. Constant transition is always the case. LINK
3) It predicts the future to the letter. Look at the Drudge Report and see that Russia just sent 25,000 troops to Syria. Damascus will be utterly destroyed. The Bible calls this. Consider that Damascus is the longest continuously occupied city in the world. It's never been utterly destroyed to never rise again. When you see this happen, know that all the other revelation is true as well. How about Obama and the NWO. Ring a bell from Revelation?
4) The Seven Rules of Hillel. This is how the Bible has been preserved. Apart from the seven rules of rightly dividing the words of Moses, the rest cannot be written. The scribes preserved this word to the letter. We only lose it in translation from the original. The Word is not locked in the linguistics. It's in the symbol. The symbol is coded information by the spirit that translates it back to us by imprint. It does not enter the mind by linguistics alone.
Evolution is a result and not a cause.
Evolution says that matter creates consciousness. This simply is a lie. We know better from the theory to be able to discount this as part of the equation. Consciousness is necessary to change the states of matter to order and purpose.
Originally posted by Prezbo369
Who? why would you automatically assume that 'someone' created this requirement? reproduction is a requirement for life, if it doesn't reproduce its not alive, its as simple as that.
Two words
Natural selection
look it up
Ever watched raindrops falling into a puddle? have you ever looked at a snowflake? If you have, you would've witnessed perfect order produced from complete chaos.
Your entire post was one giant cliché. Its the type of garbage that creationists have been peddling since the 60s, they were completely refuted back then but these days its almost amusing.
Originally posted by randyvs
Also I know myself facts and logic do not always produce truth. Sometimes to produce a truth you have to have an ability toi see beyond facts and logic. Nothing spiritual will ever produce facts and logic. A lot of people chase their own tail in this manner. Including you Barcs. Not an insult at all. But how can you not step outside the box and have a look at the bigger picture at every point along the way in the search for truth ? If you yourself found absolute proof would you believe ? Well like you said that will never happen. So you just locked yourself out..[)
Originally posted by Deetermined
Well, it looks like Razimus was right about someone coming along and making such a statement, but then you turned around and contradicted yourself in the same paragraph too.
It has nothing to do with IQ. It has everything to do with having enough imagination mixed with logic to explore all of the possibilities.
How are terms like "random" and "big bang" logical when science is explaining what it still does not know? Do those words really seem logical to you? Does it not seem logical that everything in the universe works in a perfect order and everything in it affects everything else that is in it? Does it not seem logical that only something else that was perfect could have created that perfect order? The only thing that isn't perfect, is science's understanding and explanation for it.
The only thing I know for sure is that science will never come up with most or even half of the answers. As soon as they think they've come closer to an answer, they'll discover that they were further away from all the answers than they even realized. When it comes to human existence, they won't even come close, even though they think they will.
Wouldn't nature have to have some kind of intelligence to be able to "select" anything? Who or what determines which species is ultimately going to be the stronger one over the weaker one? Who or what decided which animals were going to eat plants and which ones were going to eat meat?
Originally posted by Barcs
I'm not sure if you noticed, but I was responding to the guy who said that people who don't see intelligence in design have lower intelligence, which is false and statistics show otherwise.
Nice video, this guy wrote the code for the MRI, I agree with him, atheists will say believers are below them in intelligence, when such is not the case nor ever will be. When it gets down to it this will not persuade the un-believers from believing, because they do not have the 'eye' which can see.
Creativity has nothing to do with intelligence? I'm not sure I agree with that at all. It's not about exploring possibilities, it's about scientific proof. Obviously there are tons of possibilities, and believe me I've pondered many of them, but I look for what we know, not what might be. Intellectually that gets you nowhere, especially when people claim that as fact, when it's just a possibility, and somehow try to claim it nullifies evolution. That's where I take issue, not with the beliefs themselves. I'm strong supporter of freedom of religion. I did not contradict myself.
Can you provide evidence of this "perfect order" of the universe? It is chaotic. Cause and effect run wild, nearly everything is caused by various types of energy and forces interacting with each other. Planets colliding, stars exploding, black holes annihilating everything in their path, gravity and spacetime displacement. It is anything but perfect, but again, if you want to talk designer, then give evidence he actually exists. You are speculating about the complexity of the universe, and that's pretty much it. If the universe is so perfect, please go to the moon and live there. You'll see how harsh it really is out there. Planets like earth are rare. BTW there is TONS of evidence for the big bang. Explain something in science that is random and doesn't follow logic. Good luck.
Science learns more and more everyday. We don't know everything but we do know quite a bit. That's how it works. You verify a theory with experiments and try to falsify it. The knowledge base is constantly expanding and is our best understanding of the universe right now. A creator is not. Most people who criticize evolution or the big bang or other facts of science are not even scientifically literate and dismiss them based on nonsense. There's nothing wrong with believing in god, just admit its only faith, and not fact, and stop trying to deceive people by posting false information about a scientific field of study that you know nothing about. (not saying this to you directly, just in general).
Why assume that? It could be something as simple as a creature having darker fur than another and surviving better in a darker environment, while the lighter fur animal gets eaten by a predator. There is no intelligence necessary.
Originally posted by DeReK DaRkLy
Evolution is a brilliant way for life forms to adapt to their surroundings.
Very intelligent, if you ask me.
You might wanna read a basic article about the theory, because it makes no statements regarding "consciousness". How on earth can you criticize something you so clearly don't even understand?
That's your BELIEF. Provide some facts to prove that claim, or stop pretending you're stating facts.
Why can't it be both;
Evolution means that we have not stopped evolving.
My guess is that we are evolving into supernal beings of pure light, or some sort of pure divine beings who "know who they are". We are evolving to know the Truth, to know what Is and what is not.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
reply to post by MrXYZ
You might wanna read a basic article about the theory, because it makes no statements regarding "consciousness". How on earth can you criticize something you so clearly don't even understand?
If you claim evolution, you state there is no creator. This implies that consciousness comes from matter on a random accident. There can be no conscious choice made to rise to awareness for matter apart from the ability to make a choice. Choice involves collapsing wave function and the reverse of information entropy. These two theories negate the random possibility a piece of matter can think. Evolution cannot show this in any way to be the case. We then move to the obvious answer. We are created with information from a bio-mechanical technology. Consciousness is the key to determining the process. As of yet, evolutionary theory cannot demonstrate how inert matter becomes conscious.
Originally posted by rhinoceros
Originally posted by DeReK DaRkLy
Evolution is a brilliant way for life forms to adapt to their surroundings.
Very intelligent, if you ask me.
Evolution is the consequence of natural selection acting upon genetic diversity. There's no more intelligence behind this force of nature, than there is behind the force of nature that we call gravity, yet you seldom see people arguing for intelligent falling instead of Einstein's theory of relativity.