It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MattNC
I don't follow you. Are you saying once intellectual property gets hacked or illegally made for free download, it's public domain?
Originally posted by MattNC
So if your bank account got hacked and how to access it got posted on the internet somewhere, it's ok for anyone to go get your money so long as it wasn't the person that hacked it?
If I go to your family dwelling when no one is home, kicked the doors in, it's ok for anyone in the neighborhood to come take your things so long as it wasn't me, the person that defeated the locks?edit on 16-2-2012 by MattNC because: further thought
Originally posted by MattNC
it's all property.
And if I stole grandma's TV to use for myself, that's not profitting.
Originally posted by MattNC
I'm curious: If you all made a living and supported your families by creating intellectual property and getting royalty payments from it, how would you feel if your hard work was being passed around for free?
Is it ok to do this because the perceived intellectual property owners are so "rich"? How low does income level of those you are stealing from have to go before it's no longer acceptable?
For decades the film industry has been ripping off authors and screenwriters, not to mention the public with shady accounting, contracts weighted heavily in favour of the studios etc etc.
Originally posted by MattNC
For decades the film industry has been ripping off authors and screenwriters, not to mention the public with shady accounting, contracts weighted heavily in favour of the studios etc etc.
If you own a business and it becomes successful, who has the right to tell you "well you've made enough money now... you now have to give some up to those who couldn't figure out how to be successful." Who can judge that? Who decides the apprpriate amount?
Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by MattNC
Oh do tell me how is it stealing if noone loses money or suffers in any way financially? How is it stealing if the "thief" doesn't gain any monetary value? Explain that.
Originally posted by budski
Originally posted by MattNC
For decades the film industry has been ripping off authors and screenwriters, not to mention the public with shady accounting, contracts weighted heavily in favour of the studios etc etc.
If you own a business and it becomes successful, who has the right to tell you "well you've made enough money now... you now have to give some up to those who couldn't figure out how to be successful." Who can judge that? Who decides the apprpriate amount?
Not even a good attempt at a dodge.
Now why don't you try doing what you keep asking of others and address ALL the points I raised, rather than just the ones that suit you.
You might also like to investigate why the film industry is based in California - hint: it was so they didn't have to pay royalties to Edison, and could rip off his invention.
What's sauce for the goose...
Originally posted by MattNC
Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by MattNC
Oh do tell me how is it stealing if noone loses money or suffers in any way financially? How is it stealing if the "thief" doesn't gain any monetary value? Explain that.
Easy concept: If I profit $100 per software license sold, and sharing/piracy results in me losing 1000 "legit" unit sales, I've had $100,000 stolen from me.
It's like you going on vacation and not paying for the hotel room you rented. You didn't profit, but you didn't pay the hotel what you should have.
Originally posted by MattNC
Originally posted by budski
Originally posted by MattNC
For decades the film industry has been ripping off authors and screenwriters, not to mention the public with shady accounting, contracts weighted heavily in favour of the studios etc etc.
If you own a business and it becomes successful, who has the right to tell you "well you've made enough money now... you now have to give some up to those who couldn't figure out how to be successful." Who can judge that? Who decides the apprpriate amount?
Not even a good attempt at a dodge.
Now why don't you try doing what you keep asking of others and address ALL the points I raised, rather than just the ones that suit you.
You might also like to investigate why the film industry is based in California - hint: it was so they didn't have to pay royalties to Edison, and could rip off his invention.
What's sauce for the goose...
I'm taking a broader approach. File sharing is file sharing. Doesn't matter if it's music, movies, software. All wrong.
So, which part of the music/film industry do you work in?
Why is it OK for film studios and record labels to rip other peoples intellectual property off?
Why is it OK for the film and music industry to charge multiple times for the same product at ever higher prices?
You are not taking a broader approach, you are dodging perfectly legitimate questions because you either cannot answer them, or (more likely) you do not want your propaganda derailed.
Originally posted by MattNC
You are not taking a broader approach, you are dodging perfectly legitimate questions because you either cannot answer them, or (more likely) you do not want your propaganda derailed.
Originally posted by budski
Originally posted by MattNC
You are not taking a broader approach, you are dodging perfectly legitimate questions because you either cannot answer them, or (more likely) you do not want your propaganda derailed.