It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
published online in the journal, Environmental Health (www.ehjournal.net...), is a science commentary reporting that mercury was found in 9 of 20 samples of commer-
cial high fructose corn syrup (HFCS)
Originally posted by k1k1to
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
what about all the fat people that arent "genetically" pre disposed to be fat...and they dont drink any sodas and are still fat?
i know a couple of people who are about 50-70 lbs overweight, and theyve never touched a soda in their lives..
i dont thing sugar is the only culprit for obesity
FORT WORTH, Texas — High-fructose corn syrup isn't completely responsible for the nation's 6 million overweight children — but Dr. George Bray says it's a big part of the problem. Nurture trumps nature in the current childhood-obesity epidemic, says Bray. It's the environment we're creating for our kids that's the problem, and that environment includes increasing numbers of products high in high-fructose corn syrup, or HFCS. Bray, who served as founding president of the North American Association for the Study of Obesity and organized the first international congress on obesity in 1973, points out that between 1970 (when HFCS was introduced) and 2000 (when average yearly consumption of the ultra-sweet liquid sugar hit 73.5 pounds per person in this country), the prevalence of obesity more than doubled, from 15 percent to almost one-third of the adult population. And worse, much worse, obesity among children 12 to 19 — who consume a disproportionate amount of the soft drinks, fruit juice, sports drinks and packaged cookies and other baked goods that are sweetened with HFCS — increased from 4.2 percent in 1970 to 15.3 percent in 2000.
You didn't even include the fact that Diet soda is more likely to cause obesity than actual soda.
Originally posted by maestromason
Coca-cola is just another scapegoat Fortune 500 foods company that is under scrutiny of the critics for no fault of their own.
Another iconic conglomerate being placed under the gun for the mistakes and errors in lifestyle choices that Americans make on the daily.
Coca-Cola, IBM receiving millions in EU subsidies AGENCIES Dec 2, 2010, 02.42pm IST
Care for a little social engineering with your sugar water? This July, the American Journal of Public Health said allowing people who receive assistance from SNAP (the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program -- the new name for the Food Stamps program) to buy soft drinks with that money amounts to a $4 billion federal subsidy of multinational giants in the carbonated beverage industry, such as Coca-Cola (KO), PepsiCo (PEP), and Dr Pepper Snapple Group (DPS). SNAP recipients can’t buy cigarettes or alcohol with their funds, the argument goes, and the United States is in the middle of an obesity pandemic every bit as dangerous to American health as those two killers. Studies link heavy soda consumption directly to obesity, and SNAP users tend to consume more soda than other consumers -- 40% more, according to the authors of the report. This week, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg joined the call to remove soda from the list of items that can be purchased with SNAP money. As part of his anti-obesity campaign, the mayor asked for permission from the federal government to block the city's $1.7 million food stamp recipients from using their SNAP coupons to purchase soft drinks and other sugary beverages. He'd like to test the program for two years to see if it would have an impact on soda consumption. Other critics of the industry claim that its subsidies go way beyond SNAP funds, though. They argue that long before a bottle of Coke or Mountain Dew reaches a shop shelf, the industry’s manufacturing expenditures have been reduced below their real cost by large corn subsidies.
Do you want to know who makes HFCS? It's Archer Daniels Midland. Do you want to know who pays for HFCS? That'd be you and I, in the form of the taxes we pay to the U.S. Government. The government spent $41.9 billion on corn subsidies from 1995 to 2004, a trough of money at which ADM gladly ate. ADM buys 12 percent of the nation's corn at a heavily subsidized price from farmers, and turns it into high-fructose corn syrup and ethanol.
In countries where HFCS is not used or rarely used, sucrose consumption per person may be higher than in the USA; sucrose consumption per person from various locations is shown below (2002):[40] USA: 32.4 kg (71 lb) EU: 40.1 kg (88 lb) Brazil: 59.7 kg (132 lb) Australia: 56.2 kg (124 lb)
Originally posted by daskakik
reply to post by Witness2008
It isn't bad in moderation. Just like everything else. If you drink a gallon of OJ a day your may still drinking about the same amount of sugar as if it were coke.
People don't seem to understand what HFCS is. It's just sugar from malted grain. It is the same process used to turn starches in grains to sugar to be fermented in beer. The same thing that happens when you sprout legumes and this is thought to be health food.
Originally posted by cnsttsnc
Alright, i'm posting just for a bit of perspective.
I'm 21, I smoke a pack of cigarettes a day and my diet is, to put it bluntly - atrocious.
I'll have about 8 shots of coffee a day, I eat 1 meal per day and that meal is usually quick, take-away food (mcdonalds etc) then I get the munchies and fly through a few bags of chips, lollies and various other snack foods.
I'm 185cm and weigh 65kg.
I also buy a 30pk of coke cans every 4 or so days.
65kg
come at me
Originally posted by cnsttsnc
Alright, i'm posting just for a bit of perspective.
I'm 21, I smoke a pack of cigarettes a day and my diet is, to put it bluntly - atrocious.
I'll have about 8 shots of coffee a day, I eat 1 meal per day and that meal is usually quick, take-away food (mcdonalds etc) then I get the munchies and fly through a few bags of chips, lollies and various other snack foods.
I'm 185cm and weigh 65kg.
I also buy a 30pk of coke cans every 4 or so days.
65kg
come at me
Originally posted by henryleo
reply to post by cnsttsnc
Star and Flag for the OP for sharing the video and information.
My colleague Dan Hale at the University of Texas, San Antonio, tells me that down there they’ve got a “Texas-sized Big Gulp” — 60 ounces of Coca-Cola, a Snickers bar, and a bag of Doritos, all for $0.99. If you did that every day that’d be 112 pounds of fat per year. What’s in Coke? Caffeine. What’s caffeine? A mild stimulant, right? It’s also a diuretic — it makes you pee. What else is in Coke? Salt — 55mg of sodium per can. It’s like drinking a pizza. So what happens if you take-on sodium and lose water? You get thirstier. Why is there so much sugar in Coke? To hide the salt. When was the last time you went to a Chinese restaurant and had sweet-n-sour pork? That’s half soy sauce — you wouldn’t eat that. Except the sugar plays a trick on your tongue. You can’t even tell it’s there. Everybody remember New Coke? 1985? More salt. More caffeine. That’s the smoking gun. They know what they’re doing. That’s The Coca-Cola Conspiracy.
Originally posted by daskakik
reply to post by ANNED
According to this Relative Sweetness Scale it is sweeter than sucrose.
edit on 28-1-2012 by daskakik because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by cnsttsnc
Alright, i'm posting just for a bit of perspective.
I'm 21, I smoke a pack of cigarettes a day and my diet is, to put it bluntly - atrocious.
I'll have about 8 shots of coffee a day, I eat 1 meal per day and that meal is usually quick, take-away food (mcdonalds etc) then I get the munchies and fly through a few bags of chips, lollies and various other snack foods.
I'm 185cm and weigh 65kg.
I also buy a 30pk of coke cans every 4 or so days.
65kg
come at me
Originally posted by k1k1to
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
what about all the fat people that arent "genetically" pre disposed to be fat...and they dont drink any sodas and are still fat?
i know a couple of people who are about 50-70 lbs overweight, and theyve never touched a soda in their lives..
i dont thing sugar is the only culprit for obesity
Originally posted by ThisIsMyName
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
You didn't even include the fact that Diet soda is more likely to cause obesity than actual soda.
Originally posted by WP4YT
Originally posted by k1k1to
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
what about all the fat people that arent "genetically" pre disposed to be fat...and they dont drink any sodas and are still fat?
i know a couple of people who are about 50-70 lbs overweight, and theyve never touched a soda in their lives..
i dont thing sugar is the only culprit for obesity
What makes you think sugar is only in soda? Go to the grocery store and read. There is sugar in just about everything. Sugar in pizza? Really? Yep. Sugar in hamburger meat. Sugar in soup. It's horrible. It's like the video in the OP says, sugar is addictive. Every company in America is out to make a profit, so they put sugar in everything to make their food addictive so you eat and buy way more = more profit.
I used to be 290 lbs (5'8" tall so quite a bit overweight.) Diabetes runs in my family so I decided needed to do something before I got it. So I started eating foods with no sugar, and drinking only water. Basically mostly veggies. I still ate meat but I bought it from a local farmer who raised his cattle and pigs naturally. Within 6 months I went from 290lbs to 200lbs with no extra exercise. Not only that, but I don't get my recurring headaches or back pains anymore, and felt alive and awake every day.
It's amazing!edit on 29-1-2012 by WP4YT because: (no reason given)