It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by juveous
reply to post by Annee
Only said Vietnam war because that's when he served. Wartime or not, but if it makes anymore difference, it says he's seen through the lens of those affected by war from within the military, which is telling for veterans and active service members.
Originally posted by budcin
Ron Paul wants to cherish life.....
What am i missing? Christians should love Ron Paul, and so should everyone else on just that one issue.
Originally posted by Shark_Feeder
Originally posted by openminded2011
reply to post by CaDreamer
So what do you think about removing the EPA, and getting rid of the minimum wage and OSHA? Do you think our country doesnt need environmental protections?
The EPA would be much more effective and powerful if there was a group for each state...instead of a massive overreaching federal agency...and this is from a biologist.
Also under common law it's illegal to dump ANYTHING into anothers' land, water, or air. It would seem that enforcing common law would go a long way towards fixing the mess this country is.
Minimum wage also should be varied across this great nation, living in NYC is alot different than the backwoods of TN...see the recent story of SF raising the City's Minimum wage to over $10.edit on 1-1-2012 by Shark_Feeder because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AzureSky
Benefits of ending war on drugs:
Hemp would be legal to research.
Originally posted by juveous
reply to post by Annee
Well with that compound list of responsibilities of course it outweighs the need for a president to have been prior service.
Watch this to have non-interventionism and isolationism compared and contrasted by Dr. Paul:
I know a lot of people like him because of his [color=limegreen]isolationist position on world affairs and his willingness to legalize weed, but there are some real concerns that people should have regarding some of his other positions.
In a way, the EPA allows pollution to occur. They give out permits that allow an acceptable level of pollution. Were this handled through property rights, the penalties would be much more severe and strictly enforced:
1. Dr Paul wants to eliminate the Environmental protection agency. Our country is already heavily polluted and he would remove the remaining obstacles corporations face to pollute even further. The last thing we need is more power for corporations to pollute our air and water. The disaster in the Gulf of Mexico would become one of many disasters if this is allowed.
You're forgetting another element though: It would also benefit the middle and lower class. How much money is taken away from your paychecks due to the income tax? That will instead go into your bank account.
3. Ron Paul’s tax plan is unfair to lower earners and would greatly benefit those with the highest incomes.He has repeatedly submitted amendments to the tax code that would get rid of the estate and gift taxes, tax all earners at 10%, disallow income tax credits to individuals who are not corporations, repeal the elderly tax credit, child care credit, earned income credit, and other common credits for working class citizens. refer to bill H.R.05484