It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Iran: We'll fire 150,000 missiles at Israel if attacked

page: 5
15
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 12:29 PM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


Why do you people always question Israeli new's articles as propaganda...but not CNN, or BBC, or RT?



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 01:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by mpwaite
I can assure you.........Israel will not be harmed. Everything is aligning perfectly with bible prophecy in Revelation. It talks about Iran's alliance with Russia and how they will attack Israel albeit a defeat for both Iran and Russia. Many Russian and Iranian lives will be lost in this war with not one Israeli fatality. This war will be one of the first events leading to the great tribulation.



Do you think that TPTB are using "bible prophecy" to set up the events?

Did Iran and Russia exist in biblical times to confirm the prophecies?

The religions of the world would certainly have an upper hand if they could appear to cite genuine prophicies !



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 02:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by xuenchen

Originally posted by mpwaite
I can assure you.........Israel will not be harmed. Everything is aligning perfectly with bible prophecy in Revelation. It talks about Iran's alliance with Russia and how they will attack Israel albeit a defeat for both Iran and Russia. Many Russian and Iranian lives will be lost in this war with not one Israeli fatality. This war will be one of the first events leading to the great tribulation.



Do you think that TPTB are using "bible prophecy" to set up the events?

Did Iran and Russia exist in biblical times to confirm the prophecies?

The religions of the world would certainly have an upper hand if they could appear to cite genuine prophicies !



You shouldn't even need to ask that question. Russia the nation didn't exist in those times, but the ancestors of the russians today did exist back then. Russians, europeans and the american decendants of europeans are from the lines of Japheth. The middle eastern folk are Shemitic or Shemites (S in hebrew has a shhh sound), the decendants of Shem. As for the african peoples? They came from Ham, who looked on his fathers nakedness and did not avert his eyes and so God cursed him and his decendants to be the servant (slave) of his brothers.

It's not the religions of the world that are domineering and conquesting. Its the 1% greedy bastards that rule this world pushing this war. True men and women of God don't give a flip about riches or wealth because we know we cannot take it with us when we die so it's pointless to even try to hoard it. This upcoming WWIII ain't gonna be over religion, it's going to be over cash. Need proof? Look at the world economy. The world Economy is about to tank for the last time, every nations credit rating is going to be piss poor and who stands to lose the most? Not the wealthy or rich, they've sunk their worthles paper money into real gold, even the price of oil is going to be dirt cheap and there will come a day and it is coming soon when even gold will be worthless and people will be throwing their gold and money in the streets (think Baghdad when the U.S. invaded and deposed Saddam, the money became worthless and people threw it into the streets).



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 02:14 PM
link   
The translation is probably poor, but I don't see him saying they would all be Iranian missiles...



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 02:34 PM
link   
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
 


That's what I thought. Thanx.

I agree with the financial summary.

Do you think TPTB are all "pseudo-religious" in disguise?

That could be why they are always referring to bible prophecies in the name "profits".

Who will profit from WW3 ?



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 03:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by dontreally
That's all nationalistic rhetoric. Iran doesn't even have the means to deploy that many missiles..


Hezbollah fired 4k in '06 and is expected to have more than 30k now, so that is just the border with Lebanon and doesn't include Hamas and Gaza.

The Israel has a big problem with attacking Iran, and it's not the attack itself it's that the planes used for the attack are needed to hit these rocket sites. The question becomes how much damage could Hezbollah and Hamas do if they respond quickly after a strike on Iran (literally how much could they fire off before the IAF returns, refuels, and rearms for ground support missions). The scary part is this would suggest they would be better off with a missle strike on the Iranian sites, but if they go that way only low yield tact nukes would be able to do the damage needed (the missles can't carry the bunker busters). Rock/hardplace...



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 03:15 PM
link   
reply to post by Zaphod
 



Hezbollah fired 4k in '06 and is expected to have more than 30k now, so that is just the border with Lebanon and doesn't include Hamas and Gaza.



With all the intelligence capabilities of Israel and "The West",

You would think those rockets and missiles could be located and identified by now?

Its been years and years.

Where do they hide them?

Unless ..........................



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 03:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by xuenchen
reply to post by Zaphod
 



Hezbollah fired 4k in '06 and is expected to have more than 30k now, so that is just the border with Lebanon and doesn't include Hamas and Gaza.



With all the intelligence capabilities of Israel and "The West",
You would think those rockets and missiles could be located and identified by now?
Its been years and years.
Where do they hide them?
Unless ..........................


These aren't fixed missle sites, these are very portable devices. And even if you had them all located prior, you can't hit them until after the Iran strike (or you start a regional war up front with no chance of surprise on Iran)



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 03:34 PM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


Just check out the schools and hospitals. You will find the rockets and missiles. I wonder though, if they fire them is Israel going to get blamed for the ones that fall short and the damage they cause?



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 03:50 PM
link   
reply to post by Zaphod
 



These aren't fixed missle sites, these are very portable devices. And even if you had them all located prior, you can't hit them until after the Iran strike (or you start a regional war up front with no chance of surprise on Iran)



I am referring to the missiles in Lebanaon and Gaza, not Iran itself.

Israel usually strikes back when attacked.

If the "portable devices" are in fact portable, how does anyone know what the retaliatory strikes are going to hit?
It seems they only fire one or two at a time into Israel.

The enemies must be real smart if they have been able to prevent Mossad intel infiltrations.

You would think somebody has price for info.



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 04:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by xuenchen
reply to post by Zaphod
 



These aren't fixed missle sites, these are very portable devices. And even if you had them all located prior, you can't hit them until after the Iran strike (or you start a regional war up front with no chance of surprise on Iran)



I am referring to the missiles in Lebanaon and Gaza, not Iran itself.
Israel usually strikes back when attacked.
If the "portable devices" are in fact portable, how does anyone know what the retaliatory strikes are going to hit?
It seems they only fire one or two at a time into Israel.
The enemies must be real smart if they have been able to prevent Mossad intel infiltrations.
You would think somebody has price for info.


Im refering to the same missiles as you. Again, in '06 they fired of 4k of them. They have 30k (rough numbers) on the northern border, unknown number in Gaza.

Not really sure what your point is after this post.



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 04:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Zaphod
 


The point is that Israel should be able to find these.

Especially with as many as there are.

They do have agents in Lebanon and Gaza.

Why aren't they destroying them ahead of time?



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 04:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by xuenchen
reply to post by Zaphod
 


The point is that Israel should be able to find these.
Especially with as many as there are.
They do have agents in Lebanon and Gaza.
Why aren't they destroying them ahead of time?


Presuming they know where they are, they would have to invade Lebanon and Gaza to take them out. Is that what you are advocating?



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 05:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by Zaphod

Originally posted by xuenchen
reply to post by Zaphod
 


The point is that Israel should be able to find these.
Especially with as many as there are.
They do have agents in Lebanon and Gaza.
Why aren't they destroying them ahead of time?


Presuming they know where they are, they would have to invade Lebanon and Gaza to take them out. Is that what you are advocating?



Of course not.

But the info sure would be compelling at a U.N. hearing.

Satellite photos?

But maybe a secret operation could take out the threats and save lives at home.



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 05:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by xuenchen
But maybe a secret operation could take out the threats and save lives at home.


You've been watching a little too much The Unit I think. Taking out 10's of thousands of rockets is not a 'secret operation'. The last time Israel tried was in '06 and they did a pretty good job given the time they had, but this would be an invasion of both Lebanon and Gaza to tackle the problem.



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 06:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Zaphod

Originally posted by xuenchen
But maybe a secret operation could take out the threats and save lives at home.


You've been watching a little too much The Unit I think. Taking out 10's of thousands of rockets is not a 'secret operation'. The last time Israel tried was in '06 and they did a pretty good job given the time they had, but this would be an invasion of both Lebanon and Gaza to tackle the problem.


Then apparently there is no peaceful solution.

Even the U.N. would need to use troops.



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 09:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by xuenchen

Originally posted by Zaphod

Originally posted by xuenchen
But maybe a secret operation could take out the threats and save lives at home.


You've been watching a little too much The Unit I think. Taking out 10's of thousands of rockets is not a 'secret operation'. The last time Israel tried was in '06 and they did a pretty good job given the time they had, but this would be an invasion of both Lebanon and Gaza to tackle the problem.


Then apparently there is no peaceful solution.
Even the U.N. would need to use troops.


Hezbollah and Hamas could make a final and lasting peace with Israel (well, at least Hamas could, Hezbollah is just a military faction of Iran anyhow). The wildcard is Assad and what happens after he (finally) falls. That may cut off Hezbollah from much the support it needs.




top topics



 
15
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join