reply to post by truetrigger
"Having something in your possession, that you have not exchanged something of value (money) for is theft. " Really? You never watched a DVD off a
friend?.... Listened to a cd? Did you pay them then?....... No?..... So by your logic your a theif?
Apparently, yes. Also, if you ever made a mix tape for a friend and didn't pay royalties to the musicians on the tape, would you be the thief or would
it be the friend you made the mixtape for because it is in their possession? Ever borrowed a friends CD or album? Stealing! Even though your friend
purchased the CD you did not pay for apparently what amounts to the right to appreciate the art so if you listen to it at all without paying for it,
you are stealing it. Suppose you copy the album from your friend? He still has it, he just doesn't have to keep loaning it to you. I mean, hell, you
were already stealing the music the moment you borrowed the CD, listening to it and appreciating it without paying for it. You can't unlisten to it.
In for a dime, in for a dollar, might as well copy your friends CD.
Man, I'm thieving all the time when I go to the library for a movie or book. It's in my possession and I didn't pay for it. Of course I give them
back, but if I, say, copied a movie from the library, would that be stealing? The library still has their copy to lend at will and I could check it
out again and again any time I want for free but just don't want to waste the gas going back and forth from the library.
Again, who is being hurt by piracy? Largely, based on the financial breakdown I posted earlier, the system. The artist doesn't make that much from a
CD sale as it is but certainly benefits from the word of mouth file sharing generates.
Intellectual property is interesting because it covers everything from (apparently) China and Russia stealing US tech info for PROFIT and ADVANTAGE
(That is definitely stealing) and a video game developer snaking a game out from under a competitor for...PROFIT and ADVANTAGE (again definitely
stealing) to downloading something from Pirate Bay (definitely not stealing unless you don't seed at least 1:1-in other words, put back in what you
took out. ) There is no profit in that, no funneling money away from the artist because the fact is, that most likely, unless it was an artist I
absolutely loved I would not buy the CD anyway because I have a very limited discretionary income. And again I stress, how would I know I loved an
artist if I'd never heard them? How many friends do I tell about music that I love? At least 10, some of whom share it with their circle I do not
seek to profit or gain. It is morally equivalent to borrowing a cd from a friend or from the library and actually ends in more people knowing about,
hearing, and liking an artist, a good proportion of whom have a bigger discretionary spending budget and thus purchase CD's.
Did you notice in that breakdown that the artist royalty for a $16 CD is $1.60. The Lable profit is $1.70 but they also have $3 overhead. Nearly $10
of every $16 CD is split exclusively between the lable and the retailer (and doesn't include manufacturing costs.) Business is just pissed because
people and artists are beginning to figure out how to cut out the middle man out of the process and they are used to getting their cut. Support the
artists, don't support the industry.
edit on 3-11-2011 by coyotepoet because: (no reason given)