It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This is important.
There is claims that there are scars left by wings.
For one, wings dont leave 'scars' at 500 mph in soft soil.
2. The photographer of this photo was standing in the trench commonly confused as to have been caused by wings.
As you can see....
as the ground is weathered and unbroken
....as you can see where the photographer is standing.
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
For one, wings dont leave 'scars' at 500 mph in soft soil. 2
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Are you going to publically admit that you know nothing of crash physics especially Flight 93 and that your silly illustrations of tail fins scars and wing scars was proven to be drainage marks into the pre 911 drainage ditc??? [
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Are you going to publically admit that you know nothing of crash physics especially Flight 93 and that your silly illustrations of tail fins scars and wing scars was proven to be drainage marks into the pre 911 drainage ditc??? [
Actually I do have experience in investigating aircraft accidents.
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
reply to post by hooper
Hey Jwad, how do you figure the plane is 800 meters long?
Sillys. armchair pseudo-skeptics...So blind so blind.
edit on 10-10-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)
Here is an example of the absurdity that the 30-40 foot wide 10 foot deep crater was caused by a 124 foot wide Boeing 757