It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DerbyCityLights
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by openminded2011
Cool story bro! Anecdotal 'evidence' and a rocket lifting off and disappearing in the sky does not equal a moon landing but good on you for flying the flag of national pride. Does my comment make you angry too? Opinions differ, get over it. Sure they could afford a nice big firework for you all to watch, you ended up paying for it.
You sound like a little kid who is lashing out after getting your feelings hurt. All that amounts to is sanctimonious sarcasm dripping with narcissism. I know those are some big words. Do I need to google them for you?
Why is it that most everyone (not all, but most) who are detractors of the moon landings get bent out of shape when actual proof is given that goes against their beliefs? The Lunar Laser Ranging Experiment, the recent photos that clearly show foot paths and tire tracks, the video, the audio, the first hand witnesses. None of it ever makes a difference. Instead, these facts are distorted by ignorance and a general lack of civility. I have yet to hear a moon landing detractor find a first hand witness that corroborates their beliefs. Its always supposition of incorrect facts and false logic that is relied on to promote the claim that we never went to the moon.
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
On no single of those so called super-new super-sharp images can anything be seen except tracks. Can you see the remains of spacecraft, lunar rovers, etc, or can you, like me just see blobs? If I could see it, I wouldn't need a large arrow and a label telling me what it is.
Originally posted by Frira
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by Phage
Bury your post? What evidence did you provide? Let's look, shall we?
-"The whole NASA thing seems so strangely linked to some American people's psyche."
Your gut feel that it is strange is not evidence.
-"I've seen enough to know there is something very fishy about it all."
But what evidence? Some vague feeling?
- " 'They' are good at keeping it nice and covered. It must be sad that people now dare to question (the sheer audacity!) whereas before they just swallowed it if it was on the TV. Internet helps us exchange and truly question ideas and that is a relatively new thing, at least on the scale it is now possible."
Questioning is not sad. Ignoring answers is. Anyway, I find no evidence to "bury" here.
-"...he was a clever man and worked for NASA in one of the biggest lies ever told. The people on the ground had no idea."
What evidence for a lie have you?
What evidence have you that the people on the ground had no idea?
-"NASA stinks, period."
Vague feeling again?
So.. Wow! With powerful stuff like that, you must be constantly afraid of being eliminated for what you know.
I mean, no other humans that I know have a gut feelings about things they do not understand. What an incredible gift, and you must always act on that-- ignore reason if you have to, because a "gut feel" is always accurate.
Goodness! Do you listen to yourself?
Originally posted by Illustronic
reply to post by LightSpeedDriver
So you can grind glasses as well as having insurmountable preconceived beliefs about facts about something that took place before you were even born?
Tell us the next lottery ticket sequence then, like one of those BIG ones.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by playswithmachines
Do that.
And be more careful with your "facts" next time.
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
Originally posted by Frira
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by Phage
Bury your post? What evidence did you provide? Let's look, shall we?
-"The whole NASA thing seems so strangely linked to some American people's psyche."
Your gut feel that it is strange is not evidence.
-"I've seen enough to know there is something very fishy about it all."
But what evidence? Some vague feeling?
- " 'They' are good at keeping it nice and covered. It must be sad that people now dare to question (the sheer audacity!) whereas before they just swallowed it if it was on the TV. Internet helps us exchange and truly question ideas and that is a relatively new thing, at least on the scale it is now possible."
Questioning is not sad. Ignoring answers is. Anyway, I find no evidence to "bury" here.
-"...he was a clever man and worked for NASA in one of the biggest lies ever told. The people on the ground had no idea."
What evidence for a lie have you?
What evidence have you that the people on the ground had no idea?
-"NASA stinks, period."
Vague feeling again?
So.. Wow! With powerful stuff like that, you must be constantly afraid of being eliminated for what you know.
I mean, no other humans that I know have a gut feelings about things they do not understand. What an incredible gift, and you must always act on that-- ignore reason if you have to, because a "gut feel" is always accurate.
Goodness! Do you listen to yourself?
Well lets see, point by point again.
Multiple posts by different people all posting the same dubious images. Sharpest ever, newest image processing, ad nauseum
Next point. How about all the known airbrushed images of the lunar surface which have already been posted (I would think) multiple times on this board. The so-called tower I believe, among others. Huge smudges placed deliberately by human hand. No I can't be bothered to search for you, but they are quite well known.
Now don't start debunking the tower, just explain why airbrushed images have been made. Then the images where the shadows are all wrong, meaning they run in multiple directions which just does not happen with a single light source. Not forgetting the images where the sun or its reflection in visors does not appear like a sun. Need I continue? I think not.
Next point. Burying. You find no evidence to bury here. Your opinion is everyones? Obviously no. Lets move on...
Next point. "What evidence for a lie have you?" Airbrushed images, and "dodgy" photos. See above.
"What evidence have you that the people on the ground had no idea?" It's the only logical conclusion I could make.
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
Originally posted by Frira
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by Phage
-"NASA stinks, period."
Vague feeling again?
So.. Wow! With powerful stuff like that, you must be constantly afraid of being eliminated for what you know.
I mean, no other humans that I know have a gut feelings about things they do not understand. What an incredible gift, and you must always act on that-- ignore reason if you have to, because a "gut feel" is always accurate.
Goodness! Do you listen to yourself?
National security and all. Are you trying to say the people on the ground were in the know?
Next point. -"NASA stinks, period." Vague feeling again?
Can YOU read or hear yourself? Blithely discarding all criticism like it was nothing.
Your next one is just funny or maybe extremely telling... "So.. Wow! With powerful stuff like that, you must be constantly afraid of being eliminated for what you know."
Are you trying to say here that if I did have real hard physical proof I could expect to be murdered? That does not surprise me at all when that much money and secret organisations are involved.
We are all entitled to our own opinion regardless of how right you or anyone else thinks they or I for that matter, may be. Your OP provided no evidence except for "My Dad worked for NASA and we talked about it much" I did find the fact that you said he came home with tapes strange though. Wouldn't that be NASA property?
PS Apologies for the complete out of sync replies, I only just discovered the message reply thingy.
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by woogleuk
I can see something, I just can't see what it is, man made, super-imposed or otherwise. Regarding your specsavers quip, I have more respect for my eyes and the people who make my glasses than to go to the walmart of opticians.
PS If it was a good picture it would be taken from a slight angle to help give depth and definition to the object. All I see is a very white shape which needs sharpening and other tricks. Bad evidence at best. Hence the labels again. I still see Jack...
Originally posted by Illustronic
One of the best proofs is the simple hammer and feather drop, someone take a shot at how this could be done on earth outside like pictured, without saying something is fake or wired.
Originally posted by Ex_CT2[/i
Now I'm just an old guy wishing someone would *finally* get some high-def photos of the landing sites, so we can at last get some closure on this. And shut these annoying little ---- up!edit on 7-9-2011 by alien because: ...editted out the censor circumvention..