posted on Jul, 16 2011 @ 07:42 AM
I'll weigh in with my opinions.
1. Tax the rich. Are you kidding me? I used to live in NJ, and between my wife and I, we made just over 250k. To Obama, that's rich. Yeah right.
Double or triple that income figure and you'll have my support on higher taxes. Why should someone who worked hard be penalized because of their
success. How about we start having people who pay NO taxes pay a little along with the "rich". 100% of people should pay some sort of income tax,
however small it is.
2. Close tax loopholes. What do you expect? Government over regulates and taxes business to dealth. Of course their response is to move jobs
offshore and take advantage of every tax loophole there is. Its not much different than when individuals do their taxes and take advantage of what
they can legally deduct. Don't hate the player, hate the game.
3. Tax decreases don't stimulate the economy. I'll have to track down the statistics, but I've seen studies that show the economy growing and
contracting during both tax cuts and tax increases. There are far too many other variables in the economy to blame or credit only taxes. I will tell
you this though. If I were a business owner and knew that tax increases were on the horizon, even if its in the 2013 time frame, I would not be
hiring or expanding my business....especially with the uncertainty surrounding how Obama's health plan will impact businesses. The smart move would
be to offer incentives and abatements, similar to what states do to draw businesses to their state. If you want a warm and fuzzy feeling, then tie
those incentives to creating a minimum number of jobs for a certain length of time.
4. Social security is my money....I contributed all my life. Yes you did, to a glorified ponzi scheme. If you average 40k a year over a 40 year
working career, you've made 1.6 million and contributed about $99,200 and your employer did too. That's $198,400. If your benefits are $1200 a
month, you're benefits would be exhausted in about 13 years. After that, you're collecting earnings that you didn't contribute. The population is
generally living longer, so people living to 85 or even 90 isn't an excepsion, it's becoming the norm. Obviously I'm oversimplifying and not
counting an increase in value, etc. Then there's the people who don't work a full 40 years before retiring. You only need something like 40
credits to quality for full benefits, which is 10 years of working full time. Someone who worked 10 years and then collects for 35 years is certainly
collecting multiples of what they contributed. When I owned rental properties, I must have known at least 2 dozen people who were collecting some
form of social security or disability or something. The majority of them also worked jobs under the table so as to not affect their benefits. The
sense of entitlement was absolutely disgusting. God forbid I had to collect $50 from them for the water bill. I was the rich and evil landlord in
their eyes. I'm 42 and don't expect ss to be around when I retire. Am I bitter that what I contributed will be gone? Yes I am, but there's not
much else I can about it other than my own investing. I'd love for SS to be changed to an individual plan that can be self directed.
As far as current debt ceiling debate goes, why is it that it was OK for Obama to vote against it when he was a senator, but he's blasting
republicans now? If I borrowed 40 cents of every dollar I spent, I'd go bankrupt within months. I hear the argument that we have to raise the debt
ceiling because this is money we've already spent. 2.5 trillion dollars? Are you kidding me? A balanced budget ammendment is the only way the
morons in Washington (both Republican and Democrat) will ever get their act together. It will FORCE them to tackle the tough issues like defense
spending and entitlements. No more Popeye economics where I'll gladly give you spending cuts on Tuesday for a debt ceiling hike or tax increases
today.