It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I disagree with this statement, but it seems that you do too, so I am unsure why you stated it.
Originally posted by sir_slide
Gone are the days when artists were celebrated for finding divinity in music. Gone are the days when artists were celebrated for challenging their audiences. Gone are the days when bands strived for perfection, for innovation and for a love for the music itself.
In my opinion, this is about the worst possible start date that could be used. Beginning in the 90's would work, or starting around the mid 60's, or even the late 70's, but '86?
Originally posted by sir_slide
I guess I'm talking about bands formed after that date, they wouldn't be eligible if they had something out in 1986. It is tough, mainly because there haven't been that many important bands emerging during this period. Not many anyway.....
Originally posted by sir_slide
reply to post by questcequecest
I think the stones are better than chuck berry, not more important but better, I guess the rest is opinion...
Originally posted by sir_slide
reply to post by regularbonj
Which is the beauty of discussion, OPINION!
Gotta disagree about Radiohead wanting to be the pixies, that's pretty narrow minded in my opinion and I have never seen a similarity other than a superficial one.
And now my bitter hands cradle broken glass
Of what was everything?
All the pictures have all been washed in black, tattooed everything...
Originally posted by amaster
It simply gets no better or more influential than Tool