It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gnarly
Why would you have to defend yourself from someone that isn't harmful? I mean, look at the kid. Probably weighs 50 pounds, while the big kid probably is going to 200.
Forget the fact that the kid was playing rough, the big kid DID hurt the little one, much more so than some scrawny thrown punches. He got his knee dislocated. That is pretty serious. He's lucky he didn't break anything.
The big kid could've just scared him, but no. He went to a level lower than the little kid.
So both kids are at wrong here, equally. There was no need to bully the big kid, there was no need to slam the little kid in the ground.
Originally posted by Gnarly
Why would you have to defend yourself from someone that isn't harmful? I mean, look at the kid. Probably weighs 50 pounds, while the big kid probably is going to 200.
Forget the fact that the kid was playing rough, the big kid DID hurt the little one, much more so than some scrawny thrown punches. He got his knee dislocated. That is pretty serious. He's lucky he didn't break anything.
The big kid could've just scared him, but no. He went to a level lower than the little kid.
So both kids are at wrong here, equally. There was no need to bully the big kid, there was no need to slam the little kid in the ground.