It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CerBeRus666
Guess it's because every time the "world was different", it was far worst then it is today...
Fear, my friend, pure fear...Propaganda, Mind-Control, Technology...
Fear, my friend, pure fear...Propaganda, Mind-Control, Technology
Originally posted by colbyforce
reply to post by TribeOfManyColours
Amen brother or sister
Originally posted by SystemResistor
A perfectly balanced soceity has its share of both peace and war, however, in terms of material resources, those that work for thier food generally acquire it. If the food were to run out (no system is perfect) there would still have to be a choice as to who survives and who does not. If we dictate the choice and describe who gets the food and who doesnt, then we are essentially robbing peoples freedom to choose and compete amongst themselves. If we were faced with a shortage of food, we would have less children, however, in the third world they are not at the level of awareness to understand how the restriction of offspring allows greater food for all, thus they have many offspring, die at young ages, have numerous wars and are plagued by disease. Although it sounds negative at first, even though they are starving, many have superior immune systems to us, and if given the same chances that we were in the same environment, would become mentally superior. It is the reason why eventually in the next 200-300 years those of the third world will control the planet, and we would have died out because we did not have enough offspring.
Originally posted by FermiFlux
reply to post by TribeOfManyColours
All you say here is true my friend, but the key factor holding us back is, how many of us are actually aware of this? Are aware of the system for what it truly is? Us regulars cannot change the world. The bottom line is, the masses have the misconception that this life, the way we live now with all it's hardships and goods, is the best possible way of life we humans are currently capable of.
If enough of us knew the kind of world we really lived in, and what we could live in, change would inevitably occur. We have the resources to feed all the people of this planet, to educate all, and redistribute the energy we spend on mindless acts into something more beneficial for humanity. We have advanced enough now to shift the priorities of humanity from scavenging for wealth from the moment you're born till the moment you die, to actually contributing to society in a positive way.
We've got to the stage where we can cater to the necessities of every single person with correct distribution of resources. Imagine if every human pooled their energies into the advancement of humanity? Advances in science, energy, technology, resources etc. What happens when you give those sectors an unlimited pool of resources? The advances for us all as a species would be exponential. [/quot
I know, I already figured that only 10% of the world needs to keep agriculture and energy supply running. The rest can expand and expand only limited by your imagination
I get excited knowing that this may be around the corner (+-5years) I really cant imagine we keep seeing ourselves as some kind of debt-slave in an system of illusion any longer
Originally posted by Doomzilla
reply to post by FermiFlux
Us regulars cannot change the world.
I disagree totally .
No aliens will save us No god will save us.
Its goin to take "normal" people to start this , people like us who are concerned for the future . The elite aren't concerned because they are controlling it ! .
It doesnt start much to start a movement only effort and courage .
I"m ready , Maybe This is the reason we're here on earth ? To protect its exsistence and its citizens ?
Originally posted by SystemResistor
A perfectly balanced soceity has its share of both peace and war, however, in terms of material resources, those that work for thier food generally acquire it. If the food were to run out (no system is perfect) there would still have to be a choice as to who survives and who does not. If we dictate the choice and describe who gets the food and who doesnt, then we are essentially robbing peoples freedom to choose and compete amongst themselves. If we were faced with a shortage of food, we would have less children, however, in the third world they are not at the level of awareness to understand how the restriction of offspring allows greater food for all, thus they have many offspring, die at young ages,
So the "overbreeding " you mention would cancel itself out if they "die at young ages" .
have numerous wars and are plagued by disease. Although it sounds negative at first, even though they are starving, many have superior immune systems to us, and if given the same chances that we were in the same environment, would become mentally superior. It is the reason why eventually in the next 200-300 years those of the third world will control the planet, and we would have died out because we did not have enough offspring.