It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Notice how they add "at current levels of consumption" into all of their statements, I just read the Wikipedia page on this and every time they say "it's safe" it's followed by "at current levels of consumption". That makes it plainly obvious that there is indeed undesirable effects at certain dosages. And you know how much soft drink some people drink right? Furthermore, it's slow acting because it's consumed in such small doses - but over time those small dosages can build onto large problems for your brain and body (denied obviously by the mainstream). But I've known too many people, and heard too many stories, to believe accounts of those long term effects are lies. The reason it's so hard to get rid of, is because it's so hard to actually show it causes damage, most people have no instant reaction to it - it's only over long periods of time with consistent consumption that the poison can take effect, but then they say something else caused it. It can kill ants almost instantly, but humans are a lot stronger and more resistant.
The weight of existing scientific evidence indicates that aspartame is safe at current levels of consumption as a non-nutritive sweetener.
So who still thinks the safety of this chemical is "clear cut"?
Aspartame was not approved until 1981, in dry foods. For over eight years the FDA refused to approve it because of the seizures and brain tumors this drug produced in lab animals. The FDA continued to refuse to approve it until President Reagan took office (a friend of Searle) and fired the FDA Commissioner who wouldn't approve it. Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes was appointed as commissioner. Even then there was so much opposition to approval that a Board of Inquiry was set up. The Board said: "Do not approve aspartame". Dr. Hayes OVERRULED his own Board of Inquiry.
www.dorway.com...
Oh, no, I'm sure he was perfectly serious...just look up his post history. You'll see an array of "you're all crazy conspiracy nut job" posts.
Not sure whether you had your tongue planted in your cheek here or not.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Originally posted by Pimander
Being fat increases the likelihood of developing cancer too, so drinking the sugary alternative to aspartame is also harmful. The better option is to drink water and small amounts of fruit juice.
As for banning Aspartame, there are other additives that cause you damage. For a start salt (NaCl) is a major contributing factor in heart disease - the biggest killer in the US and UK. They add too much salt to virtually every processed food. Surely that is a bigger problem?
Nope. 60+ percent higher risk with aspartame. I think it's like 7% higher risk because of the salt. After all. Salt is a necessary component of Our life.
Salt intake, stroke, and cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of prospective studies
Discussion
This meta-analysis shows unequivocally that higher salt intake is associated with a greater incidence of strokes and total cardiovascular events. Our systematic review identified 13 relevant and suitable studies published from 1996 to 2008. These studies provided evidence from 170 000 people contributing overall more than 10 000 vascular events.
Cardiovascular diseases are the major cause of death among people aged over 60 and second among those aged 15-59. According to the World Health Organization, 62% of all strokes and 49% of coronary heart disease events are attributable to high blood pressure.27 The direct causal relation between levels of dietary salt intake and blood pressure at the population level has also been recognised.1 28 29 Given the graded causal relation between blood pressure and cardiovascular disease, beginning at around 115 mm Hg systolic pressure,30 it is reasonable to expect considerable benefit on the rate of cardiovascular disease from a reduction in salt intake
Stratzullu et al. (2009). Salt intake, stroke, and cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of prospective studies. British Medical Journal.
"Reducing dietary salt is one of those rare interventions that has a huge health benefit and actually saves large amounts of money. At a time when so much public debate has focused on the costs of health care for the sick, here is a simple remedy, already proven to be feasible in other countries," said Lee Goldman, MD, MPH, senior author, executive vice president for health and biomedical sciences and dean of the faculties of health sciences and medicine at Columbia University.
www.sciencedaily.com...
"It's clear that we need to lower salt intake, but individuals find it hard to make substantial cuts because most salt comes from processed foods, not from the salt shaker," Bibbins-Domingo said. "Our study suggests that the food industry and those who regulate it could contribute substantially to the health of the nation by achieving even small reductions in the amount of salt in these processed foods." The New York City Department of Public Health and other state and local municipalities nationally have seen salt as an important target for regulation.
www.sciencedaily.com...
Originally posted by Roystun
reply to post by lilygotsilly
Splenda, or sucralose, is made by beginning with a molecule of true and natural sugar. Three hydroxyl groups, or atoms that are composed of hydrogen and oxygen, are removed. These are then substituted with three atoms of chlorine.
Yep, it's the same chlorine found in the bottle of bleach that you use to sanitize the toilet. Surprised? from
hubpages.com...
Originally posted by WhizPhiz
reply to post by Amaterasu
Oh, no, I'm sure he was perfectly serious...just look up his post history. You'll see an array of "you're all crazy conspiracy nut job" posts.
Not sure whether you had your tongue planted in your cheek here or not.
Originally posted by Pimander
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Originally posted by Pimander
Being fat increases the likelihood of developing cancer too, so drinking the sugary alternative to aspartame is also harmful. The better option is to drink water and small amounts of fruit juice.
As for banning Aspartame, there are other additives that cause you damage. For a start salt (NaCl) is a major contributing factor in heart disease - the biggest killer in the US and UK. They add too much salt to virtually every processed food. Surely that is a bigger problem?
Nope. 60+ percent higher risk with aspartame. I think it's like 7% higher risk because of the salt. After all. Salt is a necessary component of Our life.
Nope what? The better option is to drink water and juice than soda. And by all means ban aspartame as it is harmful but 60% higher what?
Well, where does that information come from (besides this video)? Because if that's the correct...the Wikipedia page for the Aspartame Conspiracy requires a massive update...the whole thing has nothing but how safe it is, under the section about cancer it says something along the lines of "all research has concluded that there is absolutely no correlation between cancer and aspartame consumption".
If you watched the footage, the risk of cancer development was 60+% higher in those who consumed aspartame.
Originally posted by Roystun
reply to post by Pimander
A large amount of salt intake is certainly not good for you. Does it cause hypertension, The clips that you provided suggests a tenuous link between heart attack, blood pressure and salt. The problem with this type of analysis is that it does not provide the full picture. We don't know how many of the heart attack victim smoked, took medication that had blood pressure as a side effect. What there actual salt intake was. Although I do not say that salt was not a contributry factor I do say the study is incomplete.
Its science and the global warming scam all over again.
Originally posted by WhizPhiz
reply to post by Amaterasu
Well, where does that information come from (besides this video)? Because if that's the correct...the Wikipedia page for the Aspartame Conspiracy requires a massive update...the whole thing has nothing but how safe it is, under the section about cancer it says something along the lines of "all research has concluded that there is absolutely no correlation between cancer and aspartame consumption".
If you watched the footage, the risk of cancer development was 60+% higher in those who consumed aspartame.
Originally posted by Roystun
reply to post by Pimander
A large amount of salt intake is certainly not good for you. Does it cause hypertension, The clips that you provided suggests a tenuous link between heart attack, blood pressure and salt. The problem with this type of analysis is that it does not provide the full picture. We don't know how many of the heart attack victim smoked, took medication that had blood pressure as a side effect. What there actual salt intake was. Although I do not say that salt was not a contributry factor I do say the study is incomplete.
Its science and the global warming scam all over again.
Originally posted by Pimander
reply to post by Amaterasu
Sorry. I'll ignore any more comments about salt so you can discuss aspartame!
I was trying to put it in context with other additives not derail, but some people just seem to want to argue with me?