It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Strong disturbances in air stream flows would be the main reason behind frosty weather, said Vladimir Petoukhov of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK).
Ice melting in the eastern Arctic Ocean could create warmer layers of air that would in turn change air flows, he said.
“Should it occur these disturbances would triple the possibility of an extremely cold winter in Europe and northern Asia,” he said.
“Hard winters like last year’s or in 2005-2006 do not defy the premise of global warming, but rather confirm it.”
Petoukhov and his colleagues at the institute supported their theory with simulations by supercomputers.
The latest research by a team of scientists indicates that anthropogenic CO2 does not just lead to significant warming, but also, simultaneously, is responsible for significant cooling.
Someone said on here yesterday that the reason for the colder winters, especially in the UK and on the east coast of the US was because the gulf stream had been affected by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill
Originally posted by JohhnyBGood
The CO2 and temperature monitoring stations have been demonstrated to have been deliberately placed to give artificially high readings.
You do not mind to share your source do you ?
The world has not shown any significant warming for 15 yrs and has been cooling for the last 5.
Where do you live ? It is very easy to see that it is indeed warmer here then it was 20 years ago ?
The supposed forcing effect of CO2 is wrong both in theory and by direct satelite measurement.
That proof question again... Sorry about that ...
Temperatures in the recent past have oscilated up and down without any increase in CO2 levels.
I know it happened in the not so recent past so please elaborate
Mans contribution to CO2 is dwarfed by Volcanic, geological, agricultural, contributions anyway.
Nonsense
Carbon emmission reduction is by far and away the least cost effective solution - even were it to have the effect claimed.
Well... You know...
China, India, Russia and the Third world do not plan on reducing thier emmissions in the slightest!
See comment above this one
Increased CO2 levels would be a boon for agricultural yields.
Not really. Plant life will flourish, but it is all up to the soul what can flourish
Originally posted by JohhnyBGood
The CO2 and temperature monitoring stations have been demonstrated to have been deliberately placed to give artificially high readings.
The world has not shown any significant warming for 15 yrs and has been cooling for the last 5.
Temperatures in the recent past have oscilated up and down without any increase in CO2 levels.
Mans contribution to CO2 is dwarfed by Volcanic, geological, agricultural, contributions anyway.
Carbon emmission reduction is by far and away the least cost effective solution - even were it to have the effect claimed.
China, India, Russia and the Third world do not plan on reducing thier emmissions in the slightest!
Increased CO2 levels would be a boon for agricultural yields.
In short GW is completely bogus - it is being pursued and supported for political and ideological and strategic reasons
Senators eventually agreed to an amendment by Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., to exempt some of those operations from costly food safety plans required of bigger companies, rankling food safety advocates and larger growers but gaining support from farm-state senators.
No such exemption exists in the House version, which passed in July 2009.
Erik Olson, director of food and consumer product safety at the Pew Health Group, said advocates are pleased with the Senate bill and realize there is not enough time to push for some of the stronger House provisions.