It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Since your transcripts of your interviews with Figel are obviously incomplete, why don't they include any complete assertions regarding the presence of a UFO? Nowhere in your transcripts is there a clear and definitive statement regarding any report of a UFO. In the interviews and written statements that he was immediately willing to share with me, his statements are very definitive: there was no UFO reported, no UFO was involved, and no investigation of a UFO was undertaken. He was very clear in this regard -- with me. Why not with you, or did you just edit that part out of your transcripts in order to create the impression of a UFO where none could be otherwise reasonably established?
On September 27, 2010, in an attempt to build support for the disclosure of UFO-related documents by the U.S. Department of Defense, authors Robert Hastings and Robert Salas hosted a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, DC.Only confirmed members of the press and Congressional staff were invited to attend.With them were seven veterans of the U.S. military who have publically affirmed the interference by UFOs with nuclear facilities in the United States and Europe. According to Hastings and Salas, this proves that the claim of the United States Air Force since 1969 that UFO activity has never had an effect on the national security of the U.S. is a lie.Out of all of the witnesses present,three had come forward to discuss their involvement with a well-known case that allegedly occurred at Malmstrom AFB, Montana in the spring of 1967:the Echo Flight incident of March 16, and an associated event at Oscar Flight on March 24-25.Since first being exposed to public scrutiny by Robert Salas in 1995, this alleged confrontation between UFO and nuclear missile silos has come to be considered one of ten UFO incidents around the world that is best supported by the most reliable evidence.Questions raised regarding the credibility of the witnesses insist, however, that this notoriety is hardly deserved.
According to Robert Salas, co-author with James Klotz of Faded Giant, which purports to discuss the Echo Flight event, UFOs reported over two flights – each equipped with ten nuclear missiles – interfered with the normal operation of the flights by taking all of the missiles off of strategic alert, thereby rendering them temporarily unavailable to U.S. forces.When Robert Salas, the primary witness to this event, first made public this case in 1995, he asserted thathe was present at Echo Flight as the deputy commander on duty, who, with the commander, was required to monitor the missiles and fire them, if necessary, at pre-selected targets in the Soviet Union and China.This small, two-man capsule crew was embedded in a chamber 60-100 feet beneath the surface of the Montana plains.It was very well protected, because the crew needed to survive a first-strike scenario in order to retaliate should a nuclear exchange occur.It was in this environment that Robert Salas posited UFO interference with America's primary nuclear deterrent of the 1960s, and he did so by redefining an actual event that the U.S. Department of Defense was, in the 1960s and 1970s, extremely concerned about keeping secret, not because of UFOs, but due to the inherent nature of deterrent forces.In the original USAF records discussing this event, it is characterized as the Echo Flight Incident.
USAF records indicate that the Echo Flight Incident occurred at 0845 on the morning of March 16, 1967, about two hours after sunrise. The events that occurred were summarized in September 1969 in Bernard C. Nalty's USAF Ballistic Missile Programs 1967-1968, a TOP SECRET NOFORN document discussing problems encountered by U.S. missile forces:"Another problem … appeared in March 1967 when an entire flight of Minuteman I missiles at Malmstrom went abruptly off alert.Extensive tests at Malmstrom, Ogden Air Materiel Area, and at the Boeing plant in Seattle revealed that an electronic noise pulse had shut down the flight.In effect, this surge of noise was similar to the electromagnetic pulse generated by nuclear explosions.The component of Minuteman I that was most vulnerable to noise pulse was the logic coupler of the guidance and control system.Subsequent tests showed that the same part in Minuteman II was equally sensitive to this same phenomenon."
The incident is discussed in some detail in other documents as well, notably the 341st Strategic Missile Wing and Combat Support Group Command History:"On 16 March 1967 at 0845, all sites in Echo (E) Flight, Malmstrom AFB, shutdown with No-Go indications of Channel 9 and 12 on Voice Reporting Signal Assemble (VRSA).All LF's in E Flight lost strategic alert nearly simultaneously."
These statements are clear, straightforward, and very specific, as almost all of the official documents discussing the incident are, so why, exactly, are UFOs thought to have been involved?The documents certainly don't attribute the cause to UFOs – they are all very clear, as such records generally are.If this event is one of the ten UFO incidents around the world that is best supported by the most reliable evidence, where is the evidence? And where did Salas' version of this incident originate, if not with the incident itself?
Originally posted by Robert Hastings
No video of the lecture at Oxford is planned. No money to do that.
Originally posted by Thunda
As for Mr Carlson, anyone who is familiar with his 'work' would know that this person has continually harrassed Robert Hastings, and has been shown to be wrong repeatedly.
Originally posted by Thunda
reply to post by The Shrike
Funny, I would have said press conferences covered on international news sites both before, during and after the event, would be evidence of quite a high profile- and, Robert is a well known and respected figure within the UFO investigation field. As a UK citizen, I for one am glad he has taken the time out to visit this country- I imagine it will also give him the opportunity to investigate some of the many hard sightings in the UK (including ones around nuclear bases). I find it laughable that the debunkers are claiming that he is somehow 'cashing in' by these appearances- I can think of much easier and lucrative ways of making money than taking constant public flak from ill mannered, under researched mouth pieces with their own axe to grind (dont mean you, by the way).
And, no one cares about UFO's ability to de-activate nukes? Speak for yourself- I would say that it is extremely important that a countries nuclear deterrent seems to be able to be shut down remotely 'at will'- but hey- maybe 'UFO's over Mexico' is more important to you?
As for Mr Carlson, anyone who is familiar with his 'work' would know that this person has continually harrassed Robert Hastings, and has been shown to be wrong repeatedly. I have no idea what his agenda is, but it seems as though he spends his every waking hour looking for ways to attack Robert Hastings, which in itself marks him out as suspicious.
Good luck in Oxford, Robert.
originally posted by: skyeagle409.... In 1968, Carl Sagan requested radar space surveillance data on UFOs. Apparently is seems, he was made aware that our space surveillance radars were tracking artificial objects that were not spacecraft nor missiles.
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: skyeagle409.... In 1968, Carl Sagan requested radar space surveillance data on UFOs. Apparently is seems, he was made aware that our space surveillance radars were tracking artificial objects that were not spacecraft nor missiles.
How would anyone verify this story, please?
SYMPOSIUM ON UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS
HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND ASTRONAUTICS
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETIETH CONGRESS
SECOND SESSION
JULY 29, 1968
Dr. Carl Sagan:
"Apparently what is now happening is that the Air Force surveillance radar is throwing away the data that is of relevance for this inquiry. In other words, if it sees something that is not on a ballistic trajectory, or not in orbit, it ignores it, it throws it in the garbage."
"Well, that garbage is just the area of our interest. So if some method could be devised by the Air Force to save the output that they are throwing away from these space surveillance radars, it might be the least expensive way to significantly improve our information about these phenomena."
originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: JimOberg
You can start here.
SYMPOSIUM ON UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS
HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND ASTRONAUTICS
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETIETH CONGRESS
SECOND SESSION
JULY 29, 1968
Dr. Carl Sagan:
"Apparently what is now happening is that the Air Force surveillance radar is throwing away the data that is of relevance for this inquiry. In other words, if it sees something that is not on a ballistic trajectory, or not in orbit, it ignores it, it throws it in the garbage."
"Well, that garbage is just the area of our interest. So if some method could be devised by the Air Force to save the output that they are throwing away from these space surveillance radars, it might be the least expensive way to significantly improve our information about these phenomena."
I have also contacted Ron Regehr, former Aerojet engineer who was involved in the DSP satellite project. He confirmed to me personally, that our space surveillance assets have been tracking UFOs in space and he even mentioned detection by DSP satellites.
originally posted by: Benicealways
Bashars pov is pretty interesting and accurate imo
www.youtube.com...