It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by janon
I'm so tired of hearing 'ceramic knife.
Originally posted by darkbake
reply to post by Death_Kron
It is as much of a violation of your privacy and natural rights. Especially since some people have no choice but to fly, that means that they have no choice but to be groped. Mandatory groping, in my opinion, is in fact far worse than the sexual assailant because not only is it not considered wrong, but it is considered right.
Let us say you were raped. Would it be worse for the rape to be government sanctioned or for it to be a criminal who is later charged, tried and punished? To me, the answer is simple. To me Americans are starting to think illogically.edit on 21-11-2010 by darkbake because: (no reason given)edit on 21-11-2010 by darkbake because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ProvehitoInAltum
Originally posted by janon
I'm so tired of hearing 'ceramic knife.
You know this made me think... in what possible way could a ceramic knife be a terrible terrorist thread? Isn't the big concern that the plane is, in effect, a guided missle? Okay, so someone pulls out a ceramic knife... they aren't getting through the hardened, locked cockpit door with that, that's for certain. Yes, there is the possibility that someone could be harmed by the knife, but on the flipside, isn't that what the air marshall is there for? The knife weilder would have to know in advance which passenger was the marshall, then get close enough TO the marshall to disable them first before anyone else, or they are mincemeat. And what then? The plane itself is in no danger of going unless there are a bunch of pieces in the cargo hold (having gotten by baggage screening...) that he can assemble into a bomb? That sounds very complicated and unlikely to me, unless there is some other danger that a ceramic knife proposes beyond the above scenario.
If it's merely on the grounds that someone could get hurt? I would think a person has a much greater chance being knifed at a 7-11 or quickie mart than one has of being killed by a ceramic knfie on an airplane.
Originally posted by Death_Kron
Originally posted by jfj123
This is what you wrote:
"I actually never said I had a problem with peoples homes being searched
This means you DON'T have a problem with peoples homes being searched....ehem.
would I agree with that? Nope, I wouldn't.
This means you DO have a problem with peoples homes being searched
Let me know if you need me to help you understand any of your other posts.
Nope, it means that I didn't say something your saying I did...
Just like I've alluded to the fact that your an over dramatic nancy, I haven't said it though have I?
Originally posted by ProvehitoInAltum
Originally posted by janon
I'm so tired of hearing 'ceramic knife.
You know this made me think... in what possible way could a ceramic knife be a terrible terrorist thread? Isn't the big concern that the plane is, in effect, a guided missle? Okay, so someone pulls out a ceramic knife... they aren't getting through the hardened, locked cockpit door with that, that's for certain. Yes, there is the possibility that someone could be harmed by the knife, but on the flipside, isn't that what the air marshall is there for? The knife weilder would have to know in advance which passenger was the marshall, then get close enough TO the marshall to disable them first before anyone else, or they are mincemeat. And what then? The plane itself is in no danger of going unless there are a bunch of pieces in the cargo hold (having gotten by baggage screening...) that he can assemble into a bomb? That sounds very complicated and unlikely to me, unless there is some other danger that a ceramic knife proposes beyond the above scenario.
Originally posted by Death_Kron
Now you comparing unwanted, forced physical penetrative sex to a simple pat down,
Just like the others in this thread you seem to imply that the government pays people to "grope" others for their own sexual satisfaction, another attempt at blowing something well and truly out of proportion and bending it out of shape.
Originally posted by Taliesien333
reply to post by Death_Kron
Absolutely love how you failed to acknowledge your own hypocrisy. And I never said anything about abandoning any system. In that particular argument, if anything I was advocating that these measures aren't really measures at all if they aren't applied to everyone. And you really need to quit making that blanket statement argument that we should just altogether drop security measures from airports, people are against the new measures, nobody has said anything about the measures in use prior to October.
Originally posted by jfj123
You can watch the TSA molest your children !
Originally posted by Exuberant1
Originally posted by jfj123
You can watch the TSA molest your children !
There is also a venereal disease risk from the new fondle/search/molest methods....
Check it out though bro, I've got that covered:
[Important] TSA and Venereal Disease and YOU!
Originally posted by Death_Kron
reply to post by jfj123
I like how you twist peoples words and have resorted to arguing about semantics
It isn't assault as I've already pointed out, I even quoted you your own source as to why it isn't assault but you failed to answer that. (one of the clauses of assault is the intention of physical violence, or did you miss that one?)
Simple assault can be distinguished without the intent of injury upon another person. The violation of one's personal space or touching in a way the victim deemed inappropriate can be simple assault.
If you don't agree with the possibility of being randomly searched then don't fly, simple.
Edit: I just googled that phrase, it's amazing how effective these scanners are! I also didn't find any image offensive or to be a cause for concern, am I missing something here?
Finally, no you haven't proven that it's more than a simple pat down, wheres your evidence for this claim?
Not at all. I used YOUR own post against you. That's your fault for lying.
No it's not so you didn't actually read it. I'll go ahead and repost the part I was referring to.
If you don't agree with having your home randomly searched, don't own a home.
YES.
The TSA calls them Enhanced pat downs. Enhanced from what? DUH !