It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ConradsLaces
Interesting stuff... but why did this go out on the ATS Twitter? I expected some actual, hard proof... like NASA releases, analyses of moon rock showing high concentrations of plastic or such... or even an Astronaut's account of his own experiences on the "artificial space station"...
We need to be able to vote down things like this... things that use "PROOF" and "!!!!!!!" in the title... and then deliver nothing. Whenever I see either of those two items in a title, I immediately adopt the attitude I do when I see the supermarket tabloids... Weekly World News, et al.
[/url]edit on 26-10-2010 by ConradsLaces because: addendum
Originally posted by maluminse
Originally posted by ConradsLaces
Interesting stuff... but why did this go out on the ATS Twitter? I expected some actual, hard proof... like NASA releases, analyses of moon rock showing high concentrations of plastic or such... or even an Astronaut's account of his own experiences on the "artificial space station"...
We need to be able to vote down things like this... things that use "PROOF" and "!!!!!!!" in the title... and then deliver nothing. Whenever I see either of those two items in a title, I immediately adopt the attitude I do when I see the supermarket tabloids... Weekly World News, et al.
[/url]edit on 26-10-2010 by ConradsLaces because: addendum
Agreed. Whats the criteria for twitter blast? This should not have been tweeted in my opinion.
Originally posted by ocker
Originally posted by maluminse
Originally posted by ConradsLaces
Interesting stuff... but why did this go out on the ATS Twitter? I expected some actual, hard proof... like NASA releases, analyses of moon rock showing high concentrations of plastic or such... or even an Astronaut's account of his own experiences on the "artificial space station"...
We need to be able to vote down things like this... things that use "PROOF" and "!!!!!!!" in the title... and then deliver nothing. Whenever I see either of those two items in a title, I immediately adopt the attitude I do when I see the supermarket tabloids... Weekly World News, et al.
[/url]edit on 26-10-2010 by ConradsLaces because: addendum
Agreed. Whats the criteria for twitter blast? This should not have been tweeted in my opinion.
Surely you should know by now ?
and there is no conspiracy.
Originally posted by Segador
Breaking!!! OP uses multiple exclamation marks and claims there is proof when there is no PROOF!!!
All of this is nothing but speculation and your title makes me want to punch the next ATS poster who claims to have proof but really doesn't.
yet it is widely regarded as the strangest object in the known universe.
Whilst we take this for granted it has been called the biggest coincidence in the universe.
There is no logical reason why the Moon mimics the Sun in this way and it is only meaningful to a human standing on the Earth.
RESONANCE
When the spent Lunar Landers were commanded to crash into the Moon from orbit, the Moon rang for an unexpected period of time. The first time was on November 20, 1969 and it used the lander for the Apollo 12. The seismographs left behind caused the Moon to ring for more than an hour. Apollo thirteen's third stage impact on the Moon was even more incredible. Reverberations lasted for three hours and twenty minutes, down to an estimated depth of twenty-five miles. This ringing seems to suggest the Moon may have no core at all.
Originally posted by Phage
The Moon rotates once each revolution because it is tidally locked to Earth. All of the major moons in the Solar System are tidally locked to their planets and exhibit the same behavior.
This otherwise bizarre phenomenon can be explained in terms of a subtle effect generated by gravitation and friction — tidal locking. Through their mutual gravitational attraction, the Earth and the moon create tidal bulges on each other. One bulge faces in the direction of the other body, and one faces away. These bulges generate heat through the friction of rock rubbing against itself. Over time, they siphon energy away from the rotational momentum of both bodies, producing a braking effect.
Originally posted by billymeierprophet
according to many ufo `know it alls` including alex collier
the moon is an artifical base dragged into our galaxy by ets
there used to be more than one apparently
dont shoot me im just repeating what ive read