It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by the cynic jester
I'm at a loss right now, I can't understand the heated tension over possible explanations. Maybe we should have 3 threads: one for believers, one for skeptics, and one for actual debate. It seems like things have degenerated into feces flinging monkey house style attrition warfare. Think about your personal position but be respectful of the flipside of the coin. Seems easy enough to me.
All bickering aside things have amped up to a whole new level lately. I'll reiterate a point I've made before if it is an elaborate hoax it seems alot of effort for a book no one is going to buy, or to get a few laughs out of gullible laymen. If it's real then what's the game now? No official word, no demands and no contact. Seems like a waste of time... But we're all going down a pretty deep rabbithole, where does it end?
Originally posted by 0ne10
Originally posted by XUAFxOmega
reply to post by 0ne10
Yes, I have.
What I have never seen before are the images I posted, which are clearly NOT balloons.
Clearly not balloons? What is so "clear" about them?
You posted this image:
img225.imageshack.us...
Here is a bunch of balloons. They were blue, but I turned them grey:
I resized the image, and pasted it next to your "ufo". Then I pasted another one below it, but added in a blur effect to match the out of focus look. then below that I removed the background, and made the balloons more white, and added a blur:
Clearly... your "ufo" looks exactly like balloons, and clearly you are in denial, or you need your eyes checked.
As for this image:
img819.imageshack.us...
I think it looks fake. Prove to me that image is genuine. Give me the ORIGINAL IMAGE from the camera, with the EXIF data untouched, and full resolution. If you can't provide that then your image could very well be fake, and dismissed as invalid evidence.
Even then, it looks like mylar balloons reflecting light and the camera had a smudge on the lens right on top of it.
Clearly, it is a collection of spheres... Just like balloons!
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
sorry but your in denial, your photo shopped picture doesn't look like anything like it, you skeptics attack people with nonsense.
Originally posted by 0ne10
reply to post by leeko
I never claimed that is what you saw... The other member claimed that is what you saw.
I was just pointing out that the image looks like balloons while that member, who is in denial, claims it doesn't look like balloons.
This is freaking retarded...edit on 14-10-2010 by 0ne10 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 0ne10
Originally posted by Thekid90
You responded to Ruin's earthcam video, saying there's a time lapse, that's why the vehicles were moving so fast. When he explained that there's a 30second between each frame you claim that jets are able to do that.
Enter Ruin claimed the objects were moving faster than jets, and then showed a video of fast moving objects without mentioning that there is 30 seconds between each image. I told him that they are moving exactly the speed of normal jets... Enter Ruin doesn't believe that.
Originally posted by Thekid90
Your first post implicates that you don't believe any vehicle from that seemingly far distance could have traveled that quickly yet now you claim they could?
WRONG. Enter Ruin claimed no human vehicle can travel that quickly. I claimed they are NOT moving quickly, and claimed they are moving at normal jet speeds.
Originally posted by Thekid90
Let's assume you are correct. Besides the gas interfering with the radars how could you explain the massive planes going in the same direction right after each other?
Same direction right after each other? It's called a flight path... :@:@
Originally posted by 0ne10
reply to post by XUAFxOmega
I didn't say anything about a hoax. This is more likely a mass misidentification, mass confusion, and mass stupidity.
Many witnesses say they are balloons....but those witnesses are ignored because "believers" don't want to believe they are balloons, so they only listen to the confused people who probably need their eyes checked, or didn't have a means for zooming in and seeing the objects.
Originally posted by charlyjpc
UFO´S on Manhattan? No, they were balloons that the city of Madrid dropped on times Square
www.elmundo.es...edit on 14-10-2010 by charlyjpc because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by brigand
The best way to discredit something with actual truth is to contaminate the scene and or story with disinformation. In the case of the NYC UFO, the people saw something.. they didn't see balloons, they saw something else.. something they couldn't explain. Floating balloons don't make the MSM and they certainly don't cause a stir within NYC.. these people aren't fools.
The fact that balloons were released is just that.. disinformation to discredit the REAL event.
Wake up people.. this is how it is done and how it has been done for years..
One picture of a real alien (yes, there are plenty and you've seen them if you've looked) will be surounded by 5 pictures of fake aliens.. anyone who uses street logic will conclude that if 4/5 images are fake the 5th must be fake as well.. it makes sense to try and group things into logical categories and that is how our brains work.