It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Study: No increased autism risk from mercury-based perservative in vaccines

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 14 2010 @ 11:30 AM
link   
pagingdrgupta.blogs.cnn.com...


Of course they are not going to come out and say there is. Because that would execute a lawsuit of armageddon proportions.

So they have to insist vaccines are ok so big pharma can get people forced vaccinated on even larger populations.

If there are no reactions to the vaccines and they are that safe, then congress and big pharm should have no problem passing a law that says if anyone does have a reaction to forced vaccination, you can sue.



posted on Sep, 14 2010 @ 12:33 PM
link   
That's just the tip of the Iceberg of death.

Check this out.



Listen to Maurice Hilleman, speak about what is REALLY going on.

Who is this guy Maurice Hilleman??



Of the fourteen vaccines routinely recommended in current vaccine schedules, he developed eight: those for measles, mumps, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, chickenpox, meningitis, pneumonia and Haemophilus influenzae bacteria.[1] He also played a role in the discovery of the cold-producing adenoviruses, the hepatitis viruses, and the cancer-causing virus SV40.





Robert Gallo described him as "the most successful vaccinologist in history"


en.wikipedia.org...

I am sorry that the video is pretty crappy quality, but what information is related is extremely freaky!

This stuff is a must-see and must-hear!

Please view the video a few times in depth. Listen closely.

Hilleman really hit the nail on the head with the hammer.

These pharma-corps can post all the lies and propaganda they want, but it doesn't fool those who can discern what is really going on.



posted on Sep, 14 2010 @ 01:00 PM
link   
There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that vaccines cause autism. It's just a bunch of people making vague connections then saying that it's absolute proof. They also completely ignore the studies, like those done by Michael Merzenich, that have reproduced the symptoms of autism in rats simply by playing constant white noise during a critical period. This would explain other studies which have found that apartment buildings that are next to very busy highways or airports have a higher number of autistic children in them. It's also likely that there is a genetic component as well that make these children more susceptible to these ambient noises.



posted on Sep, 17 2010 @ 01:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by nixie_nox
pagingdrgupta.blogs.cnn.com...


Of course they are not going to come out and say there is. Because that would execute a lawsuit of armageddon proportions.

So they have to insist vaccines are ok so big pharma can get people forced vaccinated on even larger populations.

If there are no reactions to the vaccines and they are that safe, then congress and big pharm should have no problem passing a law that says if anyone does have a reaction to forced vaccination, you can sue.




Who funded the study?

Who are they "consultants" for?

consultant nowadays = rent a pimp.

follow the money trail.



posted on Sep, 18 2010 @ 08:29 AM
link   
reply to post by Xcalibur254
 


Babies are surrounded by white noise. I call bunk on that one. The fetus has the noise and intensity level of a vacuum cleaner.

Maybe people with autistic children live near roads and airports because that is all they can afford with the medical bills, or they need access to doctors who specialize in autism.



posted on Sep, 18 2010 @ 10:12 AM
link   
reply to post by nixie_nox
 


That's looking at the correlational study, but not the one where they actually caused autism in rats. Besides, if you're going to call bunk on correlation study, then you might as well call bunk on the vaccine hypothesis since you don't even have correlation studies to back it up.



new topics

top topics
 
2

log in

join