It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mryanbrown
Please specify which watered down re-transliteration of the Bible you are quoting from.
Because obviously the reason your passage sounds so modern is because it was not a literal translation but a translation adapted to modern society.
Originally posted by texastig
Originally posted by intrepid
It is? 99% of men would tell you different. Masturbation, you know. That's the latest stats on the men that have done this.
Sure isn't made for the hand.
Question: Masturbation Statistics -- Who Masturbates?
Answer: The consensus of those doing a statistical analysis of who masturbates is that around 90% of the total male population and 65% of the total female population masturbate from time to time.
Sue Johanson, sex educator and counselor, 2000: "99 percent of men of all ages masturbate regularly and the other one percent are liars."
Originally posted by intrepid
You sure about that?
Originally posted by texastig
Originally posted by intrepid
You sure about that?
Very sure. Your not supposed to be having sex with yourself.
Originally posted by intrepid
WHAT? Everyone one does it at one time or another. It's natural.
Originally posted by intrepid
Sure takes the "vagina" aspect out of it then, doesn't it.
Originally posted by intrepid
I'm getting a :bnghd: feeling here. I have shown that the penis is meant for more than just a vagina. AND it's natural. The life support system for this penis is grateful for these facts.
Originally posted by intrepid
Well you've got your work cut our for you then. There's probably about 2.5 billion males in the world that don't agree with you.
Originally posted by endisnighe
Does anyone want to address what is stated in the above post?
Either the religious side or any side whatsoever?
For those arguing the religious side, is it not the truth that you are to love the sinner and hate the sin?
Trudeau famously defended the decriminalization of homosexual acts segment of the bill by telling reporters that "there's no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation", adding that "what's done in private between adults doesn't concern the Criminal Code"
Originally posted by intrepid
reply to post by endisnighe
Trudeau said it best imo:
Trudeau famously defended the decriminalization of homosexual acts segment of the bill by telling reporters that "there's no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation", adding that "what's done in private between adults doesn't concern the Criminal Code"
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by texastig
From: www.catholiceducation.org...
The rectum is significantly different from the vagina with regard to suitability for penetration by a penis.
The vagina has natural lubricants and is supported by a network of muscles. It is composed of a mucus membrane with a multi-layer stratified squamous epithelium that allows it to endure friction without damage and to resist the immunological actions caused by semen and sperm. In comparison, the anus is a delicate mechanism of small muscles that comprise an "exit-only" passage. With repeated trauma, friction and stretching, the sphincter loses its tone and its ability to maintain a tight seal. Consequently, anal intercourse leads to leakage of fecal material that can easily become chronic.
The potential for injury is exacerbated by the fact that the intestine has only a single layer of cells separating it from highly vascular tissue, that is, blood. Therefore, any organisms that are introduced into the rectum have a much easier time establishing a foothold for infection than they would in a vagina. The single layer tissue cannot withstand the friction associated with penile penetration, resulting in traumas that expose both participants to blood, organisms in feces, and a mixing of bodily fluids.
Originally posted by intrepid
reply to post by texastig
I'm getting a :bnghd: feeling here. I have shown that the penis is meant for more than just a vagina. AND it's natural. The life support system for this penis is grateful for these facts.
Originally posted by Nutter
Originally posted by texastig
From: www.catholiceducation.org...
The rectum is significantly different from the vagina with regard to suitability for penetration by a penis.
The vagina has natural lubricants and is supported by a network of muscles. It is composed of a mucus membrane with a multi-layer stratified squamous epithelium that allows it to endure friction without damage and to resist the immunological actions caused by semen and sperm. In comparison, the anus is a delicate mechanism of small muscles that comprise an "exit-only" passage. With repeated trauma, friction and stretching, the sphincter loses its tone and its ability to maintain a tight seal. Consequently, anal intercourse leads to leakage of fecal material that can easily become chronic.
The potential for injury is exacerbated by the fact that the intestine has only a single layer of cells separating it from highly vascular tissue, that is, blood. Therefore, any organisms that are introduced into the rectum have a much easier time establishing a foothold for infection than they would in a vagina. The single layer tissue cannot withstand the friction associated with penile penetration, resulting in traumas that expose both participants to blood, organisms in feces, and a mixing of bodily fluids.
That's all well and good. But, have you ever wondered why God gave man a prostate gland? And why did God put it were it is stimulated by anal sex?
Or is it a work of the Devil? If so, how can the Devil supercede God in his creation?
[edit on 10-7-2010 by Nutter]