It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by FoosM
How can gravity have no effect on something or someone moving horizontally?
Gravity does have no effect on horizontal movement..
But there is NO place with gravity that vertical movement is not relevant..
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by DJW001
If you have ever actually seen "moondust" you would know how uncanny it is. It looks a bit like black powder, old fashioned gunpowder, at first, but when examined through a lens it is jagged and, well, unearthly. It is irregular and has razor sharp edges. I could see how alien it looks... I suspect a geologist would find it even more bizarre.
Yes, and doesn't NASA now sell it by the tub load ?
I hear JW bought some for his footprint video..
Originally posted by LifeInDeath
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by DJW001
If you have ever actually seen "moondust" you would know how uncanny it is. It looks a bit like black powder, old fashioned gunpowder, at first, but when examined through a lens it is jagged and, well, unearthly. It is irregular and has razor sharp edges. I could see how alien it looks... I suspect a geologist would find it even more bizarre.
Yes, and doesn't NASA now sell it by the tub load ?
I hear JW bought some for his footprint video..
No, moon rock and regolith (the moon soil) is incredibly valuable. There's only a few hundred pounds of it on Earth, most brought back by the Apollo missions, a bit returned to Earth by unmanned Russian probes. You can't buy it. Only a bit of it is on public display (I saw a moon rock at the Smithsonian encased in glass or Lucite, or something). If anyone says they've bought moon rock, they are usually lying. Supposedly some of the Apollo Astronauts might have sneaked out some Moon rock for themselves to keep, but IIRC that is much debated (and they certainly wouldn't cop to it since they'd get into huge trouble for it).
I read once where less than a gram of lunar dust from the Russian probe was sold for like half a million dollars, so it's not utterly impossible to buy them, and some small samples have been stolen so there is probably a black market for that stuff. Also, Lunar meteors can be bought for much less money, but again, these are meteors found on Earth, not stuff actually collected on the Moon.edit on 4/1/2011 by LifeInDeath because: (no reason given)
On the one hand I understand why only a bit is publicly available, on the other hand its a convenient excuse to hide the fact they have not gotten those samples from the moon.
If gravity suddenly increased by 6x here on Earth, how many of us would be able to move forward?
Originally posted by Ir0nM0nkey
Hi,
You seem to be out by a factor of 10 in your 'Resultant upward velocity' examples...
Earth:
Resultant upward force: 3.489N
Resultant upward velocity: 34.9 m/s/s
Moon:
Resultant upward force: 43.07N
Resultant upward velocity: 43.07m/s
So you either have 3.49m/s on Earth and 43.07m/s on the Moon giving 40m/s diff, or 34.9m/s on Earth and 430.7m/s on the Moon giving 396m/s diff, which is wildly different to the 9m/s originally quoted.
Kind regards,edit on 1-4-2011 by Ir0nM0nkey because: additional text remove
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Ir0nM0nkey
Thanks mate...
I'm truly amazed that these self professed moon experts really have no concept of basic math..
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
If gravity suddenly increased by 6x here on Earth, how many of us would be able to move forward?
The question is: if gravity suddenly increased sixfold, how far could we throw a ball? The answer is, since our strength is the same and the mass of the ball is the same we could exert the same force on it, but since gravitational acceleration is greater, it will fall faster and hence not travel as far. If we attempted to roll it, it would travel the same distance, less a little due to increased friction.
Originally posted by Ir0nM0nkey
Hi,
You seem to be out by a factor of 10 in your 'Resultant upward velocity' examples...
Originally posted by MacAnkka
I'm not that well versed in the ways of physics, but even I can see that it was a typo.
Here he forgot to move the decimal point:
Resultant upward force: 43.07N
Resultant upward velocity: 43.07m/s
When it should have said (based on 4.47N - 0.163N):
Resultant upward force: 4.307N
Resultant upward velocity: 43.07m/s
Also:
The resultant upward velocity is 34.9 m/s/s after
one second.
should be:
The resultant upward velocity is 34.9 m/s after
one second.
I doubt anybody would be able to even lift their arms to throw the ball in first place
And why would there be an increase in friction?
Originally posted by DJW001
And why would there be an increase in friction?
As far as I can tell, we're still working on mass/weight/momentum/inertia. I'm sorry I said anything.
edit on 1-4-2011 by DJW001 because: Edit to correct formatting.
Originally posted by exponent
Originally posted by MacAnkka
I'm not that well versed in the ways of physics, but even I can see that it was a typo.
Here he forgot to move the decimal point:
Resultant upward force: 43.07N
Resultant upward velocity: 43.07m/s
When it should have said (based on 4.47N - 0.163N):
Resultant upward force: 4.307N
Resultant upward velocity: 43.07m/s
Also:
The resultant upward velocity is 34.9 m/s/s after
one second.
should be:
The resultant upward velocity is 34.9 m/s after
one second.
This is exactly why it's good to post maths if it can back up your claim, because people paying more attention than me will fix it for me!
Thanks MacAnkka, I appreciate it. I will edit the original post to link to yours as the 'official' correction, and backinblack can wonder why it is that he still doesn't seem to have posted any of this 'basic math' to correct me.
edit: Can't edit original, ah well.edit on 1/4/11 by exponent because: added 'edit'
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by LifeInDeath
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by DJW001
If you have ever actually seen "moondust" you would know how uncanny it is. It looks a bit like black powder, old fashioned gunpowder, at first, but when examined through a lens it is jagged and, well, unearthly. It is irregular and has razor sharp edges. I could see how alien it looks... I suspect a geologist would find it even more bizarre.
Yes, and doesn't NASA now sell it by the tub load ?
I hear JW bought some for his footprint video..
No, moon rock and regolith (the moon soil) is incredibly valuable. There's only a few hundred pounds of it on Earth, most brought back by the Apollo missions, a bit returned to Earth by unmanned Russian probes. You can't buy it. Only a bit of it is on public display (I saw a moon rock at the Smithsonian encased in glass or Lucite, or something). If anyone says they've bought moon rock, they are usually lying. Supposedly some of the Apollo Astronauts might have sneaked out some Moon rock for themselves to keep, but IIRC that is much debated (and they certainly wouldn't cop to it since they'd get into huge trouble for it).
I read once where less than a gram of lunar dust from the Russian probe was sold for like half a million dollars, so it's not utterly impossible to buy them, and some small samples have been stolen so there is probably a black market for that stuff. Also, Lunar meteors can be bought for much less money, but again, these are meteors found on Earth, not stuff actually collected on the Moon.edit on 4/1/2011 by LifeInDeath because: (no reason given)
I dont think anyone is saying JW bought the actual thing, he bought a simulant.
But thanks for noting that only a bit of it is on public display.
And thats the problem I have.
On the one hand I understand why only a bit is publicly available, on the other hand its a convenient excuse to hide the fact they have not gotten those samples from the moon.
Originally posted by exponent
[
And what does this have to do with the pressure exerted on the surface of the moon by the LM's engine in the creation of craters? Cernan said it would happen. Did he tell the truth, or did he lie?
You know there are other choices right? it's a false dichotomy.
Originally posted by Facefirst
I dont think anyone is saying JW bought the actual thing, he bought a simulant.
But thanks for noting that only a bit of it is on public display.
And thats the problem I have.
On the one hand I understand why only a bit is publicly available, on the other hand its a convenient excuse to hide the fact they have not gotten those samples from the moon.
Do a little research:
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by Ir0nM0nkey
Yep, you are right MacAnkka - I really should have spotted that !
Apologies 'exponent'...
Kind regards,
Originally posted by backinblack
No mate, Nat did not take gravity into account in vertical examples..
He stated quite clearly that velocity would be the same as on earth..