It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by seataka
Well... California is out of money and facing default,. and its economy is bigger than greece...
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by Majic
Age And Treachery
Originally posted by undo
when the economy tanks and the banks close, and there are no jobs, and the gov is broke, the only type of person with a life expectancy are young, healthy males. everyone else is walking a tight rope
Actually, the almost inevitable result of economic problems on the scale we're witnessing is war.
And in war, the persons with the lowest life expectancies are young, healthy males.
The older men try to kill off the competition. They want our women.
[edit on 24-2-2010 by In nothing we trust]
Originally posted by antonia
reply to post by TheCoffinman
I don't see why it truly matters if Greece is owed the money anyway. They will not be getting it. Ever. Germany has the strongest economy in the Eurozone right now. If Germany withdrew it's support, the EU would fall apart. Guess who is getting their butt kissed? It's not Greece.
Originally posted by eldard
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by Majic
Age And Treachery
Originally posted by undo
when the economy tanks and the banks close, and there are no jobs, and the gov is broke, the only type of person with a life expectancy are young, healthy males. everyone else is walking a tight rope
Actually, the almost inevitable result of economic problems on the scale we're witnessing is war.
And in war, the persons with the lowest life expectancies are young, healthy males.
The older men try to kill off the competition. They want our women.
[edit on 24-2-2010 by In nothing we trust]
The reptiles try to sterilize the males through chemicals. They want the women.
I remember reading the prophecy about it on this site. I just can't find it.
Op-Ed Columnist
The Making of a Euromess
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: February 14, 2010
Skip to next paragraph
Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times
Paul Krugman
Go to Columnist Page »
Blog: The Conscience of a Liberal
Related
Times Topics: EuroReaders' Comments
Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
Read All Comments (358) »
Lately, financial news has been dominated by reports from Greece and other nations on the European periphery. And rightly so.
But I’ve been troubled by reporting that focuses almost exclusively on European debts and deficits, conveying the impression that it’s all about government profligacy — and feeding into the narrative of our own deficit hawks, who want to slash spending even in the face of mass unemployment, and hold Greece up as an object lesson of what will happen if we don’t.
For the truth is that lack of fiscal discipline isn’t the whole, or even the main, source of Europe’s troubles — not even in Greece, whose government was indeed irresponsible (and hid its irresponsibility with creative accounting).
No, the real story behind the euromess lies not in the profligacy of politicians but in the arrogance of elites — specifically, the policy elites who pushed Europe into adopting a single currency well before the continent was ready for such an experiment.
Consider the case of Spain, which on the eve of the crisis appeared to be a model fiscal citizen. Its debts were low — 43 percent of G.D.P. in 2007, compared with 66 percent in Germany. It was running budget surpluses. And it had exemplary bank regulation.
But with its warm weather and beaches, Spain was also the Florida of Europe — and like Florida, it experienced a huge housing boom. The financing for this boom came largely from outside the country: there were giant inflows of capital from the rest of Europe, Germany in particular.
The result was rapid growth combined with significant inflation: between 2000 and 2008, the prices of goods and services produced in Spain rose by 35 percent, compared with a rise of only 10 percent in Germany. Thanks to rising costs, Spanish exports became increasingly uncompetitive, but job growth stayed strong thanks to the housing boom.
Then the bubble burst. Spanish unemployment soared, and the budget went into deep deficit. But the flood of red ink — which was caused partly by the way the slump depressed revenues and partly by emergency spending to limit the slump’s human costs — was a result, not a cause, of Spain’s problems.
And there’s not much that Spain’s government can do to make things better. The nation’s core economic problem is that costs and prices have gotten out of line with those in the rest of Europe. If Spain still had its old currency, the peseta, it could remedy that problem quickly through devaluation — by, say, reducing the value of a peseta by 20 percent against other European currencies. But Spain no longer has its own money, which means that it can regain competitiveness only through a slow, grinding process of deflation.
Now, if Spain were an American state rather than a European country, things wouldn’t be so bad. For one thing, costs and prices wouldn’t have gotten so far out of line: Florida, which among other things was freely able to attract workers from other states and keep labor costs down, never experienced anything like Spain’s relative inflation. For another, Spain would be receiving a lot of automatic support in the crisis: Florida’s housing boom has gone bust, but Washington keeps sending the Social Security and Medicare checks.
But Spain isn’t an American state, and as a result it’s in deep trouble. Greece, of course, is in even deeper trouble, because the Greeks, unlike the Spaniards, actually were fiscally irresponsible. Greece, however, has a small economy, whose troubles matter mainly because they’re spilling over to much bigger economies, like Spain’s. So the inflexibility of the euro, not deficit spending, lies at the heart of the crisis.
None of this should come as a big surprise. Long before the euro came into being, economists warned that Europe wasn’t ready for a single currency. But these warnings were ignored, and the crisis came.
Now what? A breakup of the euro is very nearly unthinkable, as a sheer matter of practicality. As Berkeley’s Barry Eichengreen puts it, an attempt to reintroduce a national currency would trigger “the mother of all financial crises.” So the only way out is forward: to make the euro work, Europe needs to move much further toward political union, so that European nations start to function more like American states.
But that’s not going to happen anytime soon. What we’ll probably see over the next few years is a painful process of muddling through: bailouts accompanied by demands for savage austerity, all against a background of very high unemployment, perpetuated by the grinding deflation I already mentioned.
It’s an ugly picture. But it’s important to understand the nature of Europe’s fatal flaw. Yes, some governments were irresponsible; but the fundamental problem was hubris, the arrogant belief that Europe could make a single currency work despite strong reasons to believe that it wasn’t ready.
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
You read it here perhaps?
The Gay Agenda - You can't be serious?
[edit on 25-2-2010 by In nothing we trust]
Originally posted by spacebot
reply to post by In nothing we trust
What is another thread dedicated to sexual freedoms has to do with this thread which is of economical nature?
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
You read it here perhaps?
The Gay Agenda - You can't be serious?
[edit on 25-2-2010 by In nothing we trust]
Can you people, please, restrict your personal infighting to relevant threads?
How do you report a post, anyone?
[edit on 25-2-2010 by spacebot]
A breakup of the euro is very nearly unthinkable, as a sheer matter of practicality. As Berkeley’s Barry Eichengreen puts it, an attempt to reintroduce a national currency would trigger “the mother of all financial crises.” So the only way out is forward: to make the euro work, Europe needs to move much further toward political union, so that European nations start to function more like American states.
Originally posted by eldard
I've read that before. The ulterior motive of that propaganda is:
A breakup of the euro is very nearly unthinkable, as a sheer matter of practicality. As Berkeley’s Barry Eichengreen puts it, an attempt to reintroduce a national currency would trigger “the mother of all financial crises.” So the only way out is forward: to make the euro work, Europe needs to move much further toward political union, so that European nations start to function more like American states.
tadah!
With an alleged 216 billion held by foreigners (plus the recent 8) the contagion risks mainly lie outside the border! Even the banks who are in the news for holding all those ECB-funded GGB's aren't as long as US banks are long Treasuries, for example, though they would probably have to be restructured. Basically, the economy is paying 5% or even 6% of GDP to service a debt whose failure will hurt three or four times more abroad than it will in Greece. Do I look worried?
Even with the Baltic Dry somewhere in the dungeon, this debt is being honored and serviced. Greek companies will be just fine, basically. It's the government that is the joke here, not the country! Nevertheless, a sovereign default by Greece will set off a cascade. Italy has tons more debt than Greece and a much bigger proportion of it is held in Italy. That won't be a picnic. It gets worse than that, of course. People like to talk about PIGS, but the real oink oinks of the past decade have resided in the protestant part of the world. The United Kingdom and the US have total debt of more than 400% of GDP. You can never grow your way out of 400%, it's as simple as that. And this concludes my first point: be careful what you wish for here, because Greece is a rich country that will mainly hurt others if it defaults. Directly (through the default) and indirectly, via contagion.
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
It was a reply to eldard's post.
I had one of my avatars banned previously because it had the middle finger raised in it.
As Joe Nye pointed out earlier, we had a similar period of globalization a hundred years ago. The standard understanding, of course, is that this earlier world of globalization-which by many measures was more extensive than today-came crashing down with the advent of World War I followed by the Great Depression.
Originally posted by antonia
Originally posted by Cabaret Voltaire
Perhaps the Americans or the British caused this somehow to drag down the European Eunion financially instead of with a thousand nuclear missiles. Carroll Quigley taught that there are three levels of conflict.... you can use talk, then money, then force. Maybe some Muslim businessmen caused it.
That would be really bright-If the U.S. was quite willing to destroy themselves too. There's no way Europe goes down without the U.S. receiving a huge amount of damage.
Goldman alone has taken home 725 million Euros in the last ten years by managing bond sales for Greece. How much that is in USD depends on the “historical” value of the Euro. ...
... The reason Greece might “default” on its debt is that much of this debt was from a practice that was pushed heavily in the US during the reign of the Bush Crime Family. They sold public infrastructure to private companies at bargain prices (sales handled by Wall Street) and lost the subsequent revenue putting them increasingly into debt and the public was burdened with heavy tolls and fees as they waited for the flat earth prosperity they were promised.
Originally posted by leo123
Originally posted by SonicInfinity
If this was about America, it would have well over 100 flags and 500 replies by now. This is an extremely important event that everybody around the globe should be paying attention to, since it could be what's happening soon all over.
And the crazy thing is the US's debt level (debt to GDP) is actually higher than Greece's!