It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hooper
Not all of the witnesses in Washington that day actually saw the plane fly into the building by their own admission.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Not all of the witnesses in Washington that day actually saw the plane fly into the building by their own admission.
Yes and you also had witnesses that stated they were told later it was a 757 that hit the building by thier own admission.
Originally posted by hooper
So? How does that detract from the veracity of their statements?
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Becuase he also states that him and another witness should have been able to tell what the plane was. Also the fact that he was told later completly affects the statement of what he saw.
His statement should be about what he saw and not what he was told later.
Originally posted by mikelee
There are many twists that can be placed on these people's statements either way. To cite them in any context of any particular theory is speculation at best and deception at worst. Take care, Mike
[edit on 3/28/2010 by mikelee]
Originally posted by hooper
First, exactly who are we talking about here? Which statement?
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
First, exactly who are we talking about here? Which statement?
The witness statment already posted. I suggest you read whats posted.
For a witness statement to hold up in court it shuold be what the witness saw and not what they were told, thats called hearsay.
Eyewitness Accounts
Cook, Scott P. We didn’t know what kind of plane had hit the Pentagon, or where it had hit. Later, we were told that it was a 757 out of Dulles,
I cannot fathom why neither myself nor Ray, a former Air Force officer, missed a big 757, going 400 miles an hour, as it crossed in front of our window in its last 10 seconds of flight.
Originally posted by hooper
You choose the one witness who, by his own admission, wasn't a witness!!!!
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
You choose the one witness who, by his own admission, wasn't a witness!!!!
Its just too bad he is on the Pentagon witness list. So he is listed as a witness.
Originally posted by hooper
And exactly where is THE Pentagon witness list???
Whatever. If you actually paid attention to what he said, he said HE DIDN"T SEE THE PLANE.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
And exactly where is THE Pentagon witness list???
So funny, you did not even know there is a list of witnesses for the Pentagon.
Either you do not do any research or you are being dishonest so you do have to face the facts.
Here is one site with the list but you can find them on almsot any website.
911research.wtc7.net...
Whatever. If you actually paid attention to what he said, he said HE DIDN"T SEE THE PLANE.
But he is still on the witness list.
Originally posted by hooper
You do realize, don't you, that there is a BIG difference between saying THE witness list and A list of witnesses.
The guy says he didn't see the plane. He didn't see it.
Originally posted by hooper
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Originally posted by hooper
reply to
Are really that dense?
If you actually watched the video rather than add your 1 cent you would of heard her say " It banked to the right and crashed" (the van sized craft)
[edit on 26-3-2010 by Shadow Herder]
And the funniest thing with this video (and most of them are pretty funny) she never said what day this all happened!!!! She alluded to it by saying it was an upsetting day, but never said when this "observation" was made, date, time, etc.
they describe something much smaller
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Shadow Herder
they describe something much smaller
Who is they? Besides this woman who talks about seeing an unidentified flying object at some indeterminate point in the pass, who else is contending that what they saw was "smaller"?
Where she saw what crashed was not "undetermined" but described in the video. She was one of the last persons to see what caused the crater and she described it as something not bigger that her van. This makes sense considering the very small crater in Shanksville is no where near the size required to have been caused by a massive Boeing 757 which has been proven earlier in this thread.
Originally posted by hooper
You do realize, don't you, that there is a BIG difference between saying THE witness list and A list of witnesses.
The guy says he didn't see the plane. He didn't see it.