It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
reply to post by jibeho
Nah... I think that you don't get it
I can't agree with anything you said
You haven't tried to understand the situation
Originally posted by jibeho
I suppose you'll start by first granting terrorists a US citizenship. Then perhaps you'll let them lawyer up with the ACLU and give them milk and cookies at nap time.
Originally posted by jibeho
React to the attack and retaliate with a single strike.
Detain terror suspects, gather intel and strike strategic targets before the next attack can be launched
Originally posted by jibeho
You forgot to "curl up like a pill bug and do nothing".
Perhaps that will work for you!
Originally posted by jibeho
Obama thought that closing Gitmo from day one would be neato. On January 22, 2009, Obama signed an executive order requiring the closure of Gitmo within twelve months. To near universal praise, Obama claimed his action would allow America once again to occupy the "moral high ground" and to "restore the standards of due process and the core constitutional values that have made this country great even in the midst of war, even in dealing with terrorism." At the time of this edict, 100 of the 248 detainees were from Yemen. Obama wanted to repatriate these radicals back into a virtually lawless nation that is a hotbed for Al Qaeda activitey.
How is that working so far?
As you can see from the link above Obama's "closing gitmo" was nothing but PR.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
That woman......ARGHHHHH
We should be hysteric she says
We should have a knee-jerk reaction
Why are there people like this?
She should have absolutely zero airtime on television!
This is extremism is it not?
Originally posted by mike_trivisonno
I sometimes think that 9/11 did nothing to alert free peoples of the dangers muslims pose to our culture.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by mike_trivisonno
I sometimes think that 9/11 did nothing to alert free peoples of the dangers muslims pose to our culture.
But 9/11 DID change our culture
The question is.... who changed it?
Muslims or the Govt.?
We've turning into a surveillance society moving towards fascism, as all of this happens there are still delusional people out there that think muslims are the enemy.
Terroists want to change our way of life...
Pshhh, plz, the govt. is doing that on their own, patriot act, FISA, more and more and more laws
look at this
www.cnn.com...
Terroists hate us for our freedoms?
who is taking our freedoms away
Osama wanted to destroy us economically..
Pshhh, who is doing that?
It's time we start asking ourselves some difficult questions!
Originally posted by mike_trivisonno
No. No. No. Muslims do not hate us because of our freedoms. It is not even hate. They engage in jihad because we are not muslims and they want all of the world to convert. Jihad is method in which this conversion happens.
Originally posted by mike_trivisonno
The reason why we continually escalate our security measure is because no one wants to admit the sad fact that we are in the middle of a civilizational battle. No one wants to consider the possibility that Islamic Imperialism even exists, despite the vast quantities of historical records.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by mike_trivisonno
No. No. No. Muslims do not hate us because of our freedoms. It is not even hate. They engage in jihad because we are not muslims and they want all of the world to convert. Jihad is method in which this conversion happens.
1) When was the last jihad attack?
2) Why is only the U.S. and those involved in war in the middle east being attacked? If it's religious Jihad why attack a superpower first?
why not attack sweeden first or switzlerland?
Why only attack the countries involved in wars against the middle east?
Originally posted by mike_trivisonno
The reason why we continually escalate our security measure is because no one wants to admit the sad fact that we are in the middle of a civilizational battle. No one wants to consider the possibility that Islamic Imperialism even exists, despite the vast quantities of historical records.
1) Imperialism still exists, that's why U.S. install puppets govt.s everywhere and have over 800 bases in over 140 countries. Is that not imperialism?
2) Islamic Imperialism may exist but only in the form of encouraged muslim population growth all around the world, no in the form of attacks.
Originally posted by ItsTheQuestion
Once again, that classically Amerikan dichotomy rears its ugly two-faced head.
On one side, we have the snide, aggressive reactionary throwing high and tight in order to brush back the opponent with wide strokes, so to speak. Ultimately, this ugly head looks like a rear.
And to the left, the overly-apologetic, equally delusional and understandably defensive pundit cannot muster up of the courage necessary to see the forest fire fed by all the hot breeze.
FAIL x FAIL, to co-opt a cliche.