It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by the_grand_pooh-bah
I agree with the getting rid of all religions.
not with force or laws.
just ridicule.
If they can prove anything empirically then fine.
just because something is written on goat skin thousands of years ago doesn't make it any more holy than the script of friends will be in 2000 more years.
If you can prove your god exists with science fine otherwise keep it to yourself.If god wanted me to have blind faithwouldn't I have it?
up to my neck in christians and I can't find a lion to save my life!I
Originally posted by Freedom ERP
The only way that this war can be ended, is with the complete destruction of Islam, Christianity, or my preferred option. Both!.
Originally posted by the_grand_pooh-bah
I'm just saying it would only help if that difference weren't there.
just like it would help if we were all the same color.
Let’s be clear: The Bush paradigm failed, and it failed big. We invaded two Middle Eastern countries and achieved little but to create an endless stream of new Al Qaeda recruits. This isn’t to say Al Qaeda would have atrophied otherwise, but it is to say that “state sponsorship” has proved less the key to terrorism than the existence of failed states. And, unless America can conquer every square mile of failed state on the globe, terrorist networks will always have a “safe haven” of one sort or another. Thus, the entire idea of a “war on terror” has proved a farce. The hawks already want to march on Yemen — good luck to them, and see them in Somalia soon.
Meanwhile, those of us who realize terrorism can’t be “defeated” in a “war” have had to shift to a different way of looking at the world. There will never be an end to, or a victory in, a “War of Terror” in our lifetimes. Al Qaeda will never sign an armistice in the aisle of a transatlantic flight. So, it’s no longer sensible — or even sane — to talk about a “war.” To talk about holding detainees until “the end of the war.” To talk about instituting liberty-crushing security measures until “the threat has passed.”
Whatever we do now we have to be ready to live with forever. And some of us, at least, aren’t ready to live in a state of 24/7 terror and panic and hysteria for the rest of our lives.