It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ex
I have long thought that the legislative branch of our government
was just bought and paid for, and that every four years the
administration changes, but the old cronies in the house
and senate just keep on filling their pockets with the help
of said lobbyists getting them reelected.
Originally posted by Janky Red
On another note, do you actually think a living individual and a creation of business is the same? Please explain if you would...
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Originally posted by Janky Red
On another note, do you actually think a living individual and a creation of business is the same? Please explain if you would...
Corporations and lobbyists are not synonymous. What you all are proposing is not allowing anyone to petition the government, stripping our fundamental rights from us, and using terms like "corporation" and "special interests" as scare terms.
"Robust debate about candidates for elective office is the most fundamental value protected by the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech," said Theodore Olson, the lawyer for the conservative nonprofit corporation Citizens United and former President George W. Bush's solicitor general, during oral arguments. "Yet that is precisely the dialogue that the government has prohibited if practiced by unions or corporations, any union or any corporation."
A corporation, however, "is not endowed by its creator with inalienable rights," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg responded. "So is there any distinction that Congress could draw between corporations and natural human beings for the purpose of campaign finance?"
Corporations and lobbyists are not synonymous. What you all are proposing is not allowing anyone to petition the government, stripping our fundamental rights from us, and using terms like "corporation" and "special interests" as scare terms.
Again, let me ask you, and maybe someone will finally answer instead of ranting and raving about corporations. What causes and issues do you support? Do you think they should not be allowed to lobby the government?
Originally posted by whatukno
Like I said above, the causes and issues that I support I should myself lobby for. I and every other individual with those same causes and issues. We should petition our government ourselves and not large lobby groups. We the People should be able to lobby our government not lobby groups.
Originally posted by Sunlionspirit
you did say the real thing : the rex of doomsday doesn't even understand the POWER of $$$$$$ - think he must be joking or very stupid .....
But why shouldn't a group of like-minded people be allowed to pool their resources to petition the government?
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Originally posted by whatukno
Like I said above, the causes and issues that I support I should myself lobby for. I and every other individual with those same causes and issues. We should petition our government ourselves and not large lobby groups. We the People should be able to lobby our government not lobby groups.
But why shouldn't a group of like-minded people be allowed to pool their resources to petition the government?
Exactly.
If a dairy farmer is concerned about the future of dairy farming (and therefore concerned about providing for his family), shouldn't an organized group of dairy farmers, or representatives from that group, be able to talk to Congressmen and Senators? Shouldn't they be allowed to give money to the campaigns for candidates who they feel may pass laws that are good for dairy farmers?
It's not illegal for you to talk to a legislator from another state. If that legislator listens to out-of-state lobbyists but does not want to listen to you, then the problem is with the legislator and not with the lobbyists.
I'm not saying that all lobbyists are good or that the system is perfect -- there are definitely problems. However, banning groups of people from being able to talk to and/or financially support a candidate is not the answer.
How can you tell an honest citizen that he and a group of like-minded citizens can't get together on a particular issue then appoint a person who will make sure that their position on that issue is heard in Washington?
How do you ban that group from contributing money to a candidate that they think will do a good job for them?
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
How do you ban that group from contributing money to a candidate that they think will do a good job for them?
Because that can be considered a bribe.
Originally posted by whatukno
Government lobby groups should be banned from any state or federal building. They should be banned from talking to, discussing with, or interacting with any federal employee or elected official.
Any group, firm, PAC, or cause found guilty of lobbying members of the government should be tried under RICO and have all assets seized.
Any elected official to have any dealings with lobby groups should be found to have committed a first degree felony punishable by life in prison without possibility of parole.