It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kingofmd
Umm, the ark wasn't a cruise ship, nor was it built for travel. Cargo space is all that was important. It was simply a cargo vessel to protect its occupants from the global flood.
I know I am a retarded non-science believing Christian...
Do you have any examples of the Christian ridicule, ban, torture, from the last couple hundred years, that have absolutely nothing to do with roman catholocism?
27Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid.
28Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.
29 And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe.
30 Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.
31But that the world may know that I love the Father; and as the Father gave me commandment, even so I do. Arise, let us go hence.
I think I have heard it all.You God? you seriously need to seek out some sort of psychiatric help.
I am god and I am arguing with myself. Jesus would be my brother, and the father is greater than all.
Originally posted by shasta9600
If you believe that the Bible was inspired by God, then you can believe that this is one of the few times in history where the main points of all the accounts are correct. If you don't believe it's from God, then all your points are very valid.
At some point, if the Bible is going to be used by any of us, we must come to the conclusion that God could inspire one single collection of books to be written for us to have the chance to learn the truth.
Originally posted by oliveoil
I just don't see where you said Jesus warns about Paul. It seems like you are just pulling verses out of thin air. Please, just for laughs, explain how Paul is the prince of this world.
I think I have heard it all.You God? you seriously need to seek out some sort of psychiatric help.
John 14:20 At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you.
Originally posted by badmedia
Originally posted by shasta9600
If you believe that the Bible was inspired by God, then you can believe that this is one of the few times in history where the main points of all the accounts are correct. If you don't believe it's from God, then all your points are very valid.
At some point, if the Bible is going to be used by any of us, we must come to the conclusion that God could inspire one single collection of books to be written for us to have the chance to learn the truth.
Acceptance/belief is in opposition to things of god. Knowledge of the holy is understanding(proverbs 9:10), and is not something you can just accept or believe(Psalm 82).
It's not faith in god, but faith in men that you are talking about.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
Originally posted by oliveoil
Lol, no math is not one of my favorite topics However, the Bible is, and it really makes no difference as to the correct figures (no one knows for sure). Its all about probability and all these probabilities, a man making an ark, a man collecting animals and putting them on this ark, Flooding, Raining, all seem to contain one thing in common, Truth that These events that supposedly took place could have very well happened. Even if this is just a made up story,
It still doesn't prove that the Bible doesn't contain history and truth. People always fail to see the meaning behind things.
I have no problem with those who seek meaning from the stories contained within the Bible! I certainly have! It's when those who see it literally try to force their beliefs on others who do not believe that I have a problem. That is becoming a real problem here in the US. I see those who clutch their Bibles tightly (Fundamentalists) condemning those who do not wish to continue a pregnancy, and wish to take the choice away from them, but not one of them is willing to step forward and raise one of these unwanted children... I see those who clutch their Bibles tightly calling those who chose to love someone of the same sex immoral and perverse when the choice is a private one and not theirs to make... I see those who clutch their Bibles tightly claim the moral high ground, yet they tend to be the most vile and narrow minded people I have ever had the displeasure of meeting... And I know this to be true, because I used to be one of them...
Originally posted by shasta9600
I can't make out what you're trying to say here? If someone comes to the conclusion through their own research, study, and prayer....that the Bible was inspired by God......then the fact that they now believe this, is in opposition to the things of God?
I don't get it.
Originally posted by badmedia
Originally posted by oliveoil
I just don't see where you said Jesus warns about Paul. It seems like you are just pulling verses out of thin air. Please, just for laughs, explain how Paul is the prince of this world.
Does Paul come after the death of Jesus? YES.
I didn't pull anything out of thin air, you did. Because according to you, what Jesus really meant was - "That which comes after that which comes after me".
Who comes after Jesus? The self proclaimed aposolte who's writings make up half the NT, where he teaches people to call him father and does multiple things against the teachings of Jesus.
Yes that is right, it says after Jesus. Not after you are born.
I think I have heard it all.You God? you seriously need to seek out some sort of psychiatric help.
John 14:20 At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you.
I rarely call him "God", I usually call him father - and there is a reason for it.
[edit on 12/29/2009 by badmedia]
Originally posted by oliveoil
This does not make any sense to me, And you have not given me any proof or theory to back your claim. Yeah, Paul came after Jesus, So did many many, many others. If you wanted to you could put the Holy Ghost there to fit your theory. Point is you have no evidence and only speculation, and no reasonable person would believe this garbage.
Originally posted by tinfoilman
reply to post by JaxonRoberts
Well what non-believers don't get is that the miracles that are listed in the Bible are listed there because they are miracles. The problem is first understanding the concept of a miracle.
Does the Bible mention that Paul was prince of this world? can you show me anything that refers to Paul as prince of this world? I didn't think so.
No, you can't put the Holy Ghost there because Jesus talks about that coming in a good way. He says Prince of this world. Holy Spirit - not of this world.
If you can show me any proof what so ever that leads me to believe otherwise so be it. You have not shown me anything.
Amazing the lengths you will go in order to avoid the truth.
where does it say that Paul is self appointed? and what do the writings have to do with anything?
Furthermore, while "many many many others" have come after Jesus, Paul is the one who's writings make up nearly half the NT, and only Paul was a self appointed Apostle and on and on.
Paul who claims to be the leader of the gentiles. The same gentiles Jesus said not to go to. Paul who tells people to call him father, Jesus who says call no man your father except god(Paul/Church taking the place of god).
etc etc etc. Have a nice day, it's off topic and just a repeat of the same discussion we had last week when you did the same lame things in response. If you would like to start a topic on it, I'll be happy to reply and debate it.
Originally posted by badmedia
Originally posted by GrandKitaro777
You must believe the word, no matter how ridiculous the claim maybe. Extraordinary claims do not require extraordinary evidence at all. If the bible said that there was a flying cupcake monster pirating DVD's back in biblical times, do not question the claim, simply embrace it.
Did you ever stop to think that maybe it has another meaning to it, other than to be "literal"?
I mean it's not like we ever see stories that aren't "literally real", but still have deep meaning for us otherwise. That never happens. Surely the Matrix movie was trying to suggest that the machines and Neo were 100% literal and there was no useful meaning to it otherwise.
Obviously the book Moby-Dick was just about some crazy captain and a white whale.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by Shane
I'm not sure whether you are more ignorant than arrogant or the other way around... DEADLY COMBINATION! Scary thing is that it's people like you that make me absolutely HATE Fundamentalists! You cherry pick quotes, make stuff up at an alarming rate, and then pat yourselves on the back for doing such a good job! Try rereading the linked post I'm replying to and ask yourself, "What would Jesus think???" I'm sure he's ashamed of you! You just prove that those who adhere to Organized Religions are indeed weak minded fools!
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by Shane
Talk about an "I'm rubber and you're glue" reply...
And if you're not a Fundie nor a YEC, then what the hell are you defending them for???
BTW, you showed your ignorance with your first post by your uninformed use of the origin of the word 'myth' (which a simple Google search would have shown you your error, but then again, it was probably intentional deciet). Hard to take you seriously ever again when you blatantly just lie your arse off with the first post...