It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But if you're looking for a book that refers to the possibility that homosexuality can be "reversed," a Chicago-based group says your best bet is the banned books list.
So a book like "My Genes Made Me Do It!: A Scientific Look at Sexual Orientation" — which argues that sexuality is shaped by a variety of factors, not just biological — can't get a spot on the school library shelf.
Neither can "You Don't Have to Be Gay," which describes author Jeff Konrad's struggle to overcome his unwanted same-sex attractions.
But "Baby Be-Bop," the coming-out story of a gay teen, which includes descriptions of his sexual encounters in bathroom stalls with men he never talks to, makes the stacks.
So does "Love & Sex: Ten Stories of Truth," which describes a gay teen's relationship with his tutor with excerpts like..." - www.foxnews.com...
Originally posted by prettyflowers
the plasticizers that help make plastic that we use for food purposes are the cause of most homosexuality. end of story. period.
Originally posted by infolurker
My "MIND" and "Morals" prevent me from doing what my "genes" have programed me to do.... Just as most people over-ride their animal instincts..... Otherwise we would all have a pretty bad society.
Our genes and instincts are constantly being over-ridden by our minds, morals, and willpower.
Originally posted by 30_seconds
If "our genes made us do it" is a concept that can be supported strongly by scientific evidence, then what role does punishment play in the legal system?
Seems like so many those people in jail are mostly guilty of being stupid, desperate, or mentally unstable. How does adding the insult of punishment aid in any positive way to the injury of a "crime" strongly influenced by genetic factors?
Originally posted by vox2442
There are criteria for getting the book on the shelves. Not meeting those standards does not constitute a ban.
Originally posted by vox2442
I don't see a double standard.
Originally posted by vox2442
Think about it this way: if you self publish a book, and it gets refused by your local library, is it a ban? If wal-mart declines the chance to stock it on their shelves, has it been banned? If Oprah doesn't add it to her club, has it been banned?
Originally posted by vox2442
Libraries are under no obligation to represent every single facet of a given debate or issue. It would be nice if that were the case, and perhaps someday with the advent of e-books it will be possible, but at this point it's just not reasonable to expect that.
Originally posted by vox2442
I relied on inter-library loans for about 50% of my thesis work, because the stuff I needed just wasn't on the shelves at my school. In some cases, it wasn't on the shelves in the same country. No conspiracy, no double standard - they were just books that the library didn't have.
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by vox2442
I don't see a double standard.
So these books:
"But "Baby Be-Bop," the coming-out story of a gay teen, which includes descriptions of his sexual encounters in bathroom stalls with men he never talks to, makes the stacks.
So does "Love & Sex: Ten Stories of Truth," which describes a gay teen's relationship with his tutor with excerpts like: "Matt had one leg locked between mine, so that his d—- was smashed between his stomach and my thigh. And as his hand jerked up and down on me his hips humped with the same rhythm." - www.foxnews.com...
Are okay for a school library then?
Originally posted by vox2442
Think about it this way: if you self publish a book, and it gets refused by your local library, is it a ban? If wal-mart declines the chance to stock it on their shelves, has it been banned? If Oprah doesn't add it to her club, has it been banned?
The dictionary says this about banning:
": to prohibit the use, performance, or distribution of `ban a book` `ban a pesticide`" - www.merriam-webster.com...
Sounds like a ban to me.
Originally posted by vox2442
Libraries are under no obligation to represent every single facet of a given debate or issue. It would be nice if that were the case, and perhaps someday with the advent of e-books it will be possible, but at this point it's just not reasonable to expect that.
Okay, so you disagree with the following statments?:
"Libraries should provide materials and information presenting all points of view on current and historical issues. Materials should not be proscribed or removed because of partisan or doctrinal disapproval."
"Libraries should cooperate with all persons and groups concerned with resisting abridgment of free expression and free access to ideas." - www.foxnews.com...
It's certainly your right to do so, just seems a bit unfair to the kids to me to only represent the political viewpoints of the faculty. To me that's not educational facility, that's a factory. Even as a parent I don't do that to my child.
Originally posted by vox2442
Depends on the school, I suppose. I assume we're not talking about an elementary school. The article isn't clear on what level of swchool they're making this accusation over. Is it a junior high school? A High School?
Originally posted by vox2442
...while a search of the Fairfax online library catalogue shows it too has "Love & Sex" and "Baby B-Bop" in its high school libraries."
Originally posted by vox2442
They mention Universities, are those books with the highlighted naughty bits to be found there?
Originally posted by vox2442
Except it's not.
For something to be prohibited, there needs to be a legislating body behind it and a specific legislation relating to it. IF the school board were to explicitly say: "no school library shall have this book on the shelves", that would be a ban - both in the legal sense and under the colloquial definition you provide above.
Originally posted by vox2442
No, I agree with that. But there are limits to what libraries can do under that guideline. As every individual piece of authorship technically represents a unique point of view, all books published on a given topic should be provided.
Originally posted by vox2442
In the case of, say, Roman History, that would require turning most of the average high school into a library dedicated to Roman Studies. It's not possible to follow that guideline to the letter.
Originally posted by vox2442
I think you might be being a little harsh here. We're talking about libraries in general - and that covers quite a lot of ground, when we're looking at the entire USA. Even poorly-equipped high school library collections running into the thousands. Is it fair to say that there is NO library in the entire USA that deals with the subject covered in the supposedly banned book?
Originally posted by vox2442
I can't see that. There are numerous journals devoted exclusively to human sexuality. Any university with a psychology department, sociology department, or anthropology department will likely offer a handful of courses dealing with the topic, at the very least. Sex is a popular topic for academic research. If, in all of those universities, there is not a single work exploring the topic of this book in detail, then I would say that this book has a right to be on the shelf, as it's a unique piece of work.
Originally posted by vox2442
However, as this idea - that homosexuality is something that can be reversed - has been around since the 19th century, I have a hard time accepting that this can be the case. This debate - over the classification of homosexuality as a mental illness, over aversion therapy, surgical manipulation, coaching, et cetera has been played out extensively since the 1960s, and both the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association have long since weighed in on the issue.
Originally posted by vox2442
If their research, pro and con, has been removed from the shelves, then this book should be allowed a place. But I'm wiling to bet that it hasn't.