It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lillydale
I have not watched any P4T videos. Can you explain what it is that is factually incorrect about them?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Lillydale
Many of their false allegations have already been mentioned in this very thread. They have parts of their videos that concern the FDR. They use the badly interpreted data decode, the original one, with poor math and illogical assumptions...all to make a presentation that is loaded with inaccuracy.
I really believe that Rob Balsamo willingly lies. Motive seems to be profit-driven (or ego??) Because, there seems to be only ONE other explanation for his behavior, and that would be that he is genuinely delusional.
I am not able to be certain, though, since I have no training in psychology, medicine, or any other discipline necessary to understand this behavior exhibited by Balsamo.
Other casual glimpses into his mind, via other behavioral traits, seem to indicate (to this medical layperson) a tendency to paranoia too. And, immaturity (they may be linked, not sure...)
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by Lillydale
I have not watched any P4T videos. Can you explain what it is that is factually incorrect about them?
Why don't you watch them? Then you can use your own head to determine veracity rather than rely on someone else.
Originally posted by Lillydale
I am really sorry. It seems lately that OSers have developed this bad habit of denouncing things as rubbish but then getting very unhappy when asked to clarify the truth about said rubbish.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Did you read what I replied to? I was replying directly to the statement that the videos they offer are NOT TECHNICALLY CORRECT. If a group calling themselves X4T is putting out videos with false information, then I am a little curious as to what that false information would be.
What is so hard for you to understand?
Why do I need to see them before I can ask someone to clarify what it is they claim is incorrect about them? If anything, it would save me the trouble of bothering to watch them, right?
Originally posted by trebor451
I'm sorry you don't feel you have the ability to view these videos and make up your own mind about their content and what they claim. The fact that you have to rely on others to explain things to you is not a very good place to be in, especially when you hang around an online forum such as ATS. Doesn't do much for your credibility.
It does make it a bit easier to understand why you post the posts you post, though. Someone who cannot make their own mind about something and must rely on others to explain things are ripe fools for PfT and similar organizations.
Originally posted by cesura
To save you the trouble of watching any PfT videos, and
to spare you the expense of paying for any of them, here
is a technical review of one PfT video that has been of
some relevance to this thread:
www.ccs.neu.edu...
Rob Balsamo, posting in this thread as a sock puppet,
quoted himself in the third person as saying he agreed
with the main premise of that review: that there exist
flight paths whose g-loads are well within the capability
of a 757.
That means the primary claim of the video reviewed, as
quoted at the beginning of the review, is false. Rob
attempted to deny that, using the same bait-and-switch
explained in the review: After claiming that "g-loads
required to pull out of a dive from the top of the VDOT
antenna are impossible for a 757", Rob switched to
saying his own favorite flight path was impossible.
Duh.
In this thread, Rob continued to defend his own favorite
flight path (as presented in the video) on the grounds
that it was implied by "the data", which brings Rob's
interpretation of the data into question. When the
video was made, the FDR data available to Rob ended at
least 4 seconds before impact with the Pentagon. Most
investigators understood that, for reasons explained
in the review. Not Rob. Rob denied that any seconds
were missing, and based his own favorite flight path on
his belief that the FDR data continued right up to the
Pentagon.
Thanks to Warren Stutt's recovery of the missing seconds,
there is no longer any doubt whatsoever: Rob's favorite
flight path is not consistent with the FDR data.
Hence the PfT part of the reviewed video is completely
worthless, and there is really no way to argue otherwise.
Rob has attempted to distract us from the technical errors
of his past videos by introducing new distractions, such
as his flight deck door fail. Although Rob is apparently
no longer with us here at ATS, some continue to carry his
water.
Will
Wait a minute here! I would have to buy them and trebor and ww think it would be better if I sent P4T money to hear what they call lies than just show me what are lies? How does that make any sense?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Lillydale
Waiting for you to review the link that cesura has conveniently and graciously provided.
Now, you can see ONE side, and whenever you happen to later see the video in question, you will be better armed with knowledge so as not to be taken in by their buffoonery, bloviation and bluster. (I know redundant...what can I say, 'bloviate' is a good description!)
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Oh, and just an aside again, since you seem to think I was bashing Balsamo unnecessarily...
you should see the antics he actually employs on his site, where he's boss. Really. Unilaterally changing people's screennames, banning people willy-nilly for no other reason than not agreeing with him...etc. He decided, after banning trebor over there, to alter the screenname to "trebortroll". Is that the action of a person who is a mature, sane and fully functioning adult???
Originally posted by Lillydale
Wait a minute here! I would have to buy them and trebor and ww think it would be better if I sent P4T money to hear what they call lies than just show me what are lies? How does that make any sense?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
He decided, after banning trebor over there, to alter the screenname to "trebortroll". Is that the action of a person who is a mature, sane and fully functioning adult???
Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by Lillydale
I have not watched any P4T videos. Can you explain what it is that is factually incorrect about them?
Why don't you watch them? Then you can use your own head to determine veracity rather than rely on someone else.
Because I read somewhere recently that they were full of lies. If that is true, then the lies they are full of should be pretty easy to both sum up and correct. Now if what I heard was true, then why waste my time watching videos when I can just read a list of the lies in them and the truths that go along. Are you not interested in the truth behind 9/11? Are you secretly just trying to get people to watch P4T videos? You claimed they were full of lies. I just thought you could run down a few real quick and teach me the real truth of 9/11 but if you would rather I watch propaganda and just buy into it then I am not sure what your real intentions are.
It is simple. How long does it take to watch a bunch of videos?
How long would it take to list some of the lies of the videos and the truths that go with them?
Why would you rather I waste my time giving them an audience when you can just share the truth with me and convert yet another ignorant lost soul?
I am really sorry. It seems lately that OSers have developed this bad habit of denouncing things as rubbish but then getting very unhappy when asked to clarify the truth about said rubbish.
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by Lillydale
Wait a minute here! I would have to buy them and trebor and ww think it would be better if I sent P4T money to hear what they call lies than just show me what are lies? How does that make any sense?
A fool and his money are soon parted, so I would fully expect you to buy them.
Originally posted by thomk
LMAO.
"How long does it take [YOU, trebor] to watch a bunch of videos?"
"How long would it take [YOU, trebor] to list some of the lies ...?"
"How long would it take [YOU, trebor] to list the [corrections] ...?"
Perhaps if you decide to get off your duff & put in a little effort of your own, then you wouldn't be utterly dependent on others to analyze, dissect & spoon feed you your conclusions. You might find that you actually like thinking for yourself.
"Why would you rather I waste my time ..."
Or you could go back to doing your nails...
What was I thinking?
LMAO.
Tomk
[edit on 18-12-2009 by thomk]
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by weedwhacker
He decided, after banning trebor over there, to alter the screenname to "trebortroll". Is that the action of a person who is a mature, sane and fully functioning adult???
Did he really? lol
The things that amuse some people really are windows into not only their soul, but their intellect and character, as well.
[edit on 18-12-2009 by trebor451]
Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by thomk
LMAO.
"How long does it take [YOU, trebor] to watch a bunch of videos?"
"How long would it take [YOU, trebor] to list some of the lies ...?"
"How long would it take [YOU, trebor] to list the [corrections] ...?"
Yes. Why don't you spend your money to buy videos. You tell me what it is you think is wrong with them
Perhaps if you decide to get off your duff & put in a little effort of your own, then you wouldn't be utterly dependent on others to analyze, dissect & spoon feed you your conclusions. You might find that you actually like thinking for yourself.
"Why would you rather I waste my time ..."
Or you could go back to doing your nails...
What was I thinking?
LMAO.
Tomk
[edit on 18-12-2009 by thomk]
If you were not so busy being a sexist ass,
Originally posted by Lillydale
you might realize something. I do not need anyone to come up with my conclusions. I have no problem coming to them all by myself.
Originally posted by Lillydale
My research leads to my conclusions.
Originally posted by Lillydale
You seem to think you have different conclusions. This must mean you found something different in your research. I asked you to go ahead and show us what you had
Originally posted by Lillydale
but apparently all you have is snide remarks about how a fool and his money are soon parted
Originally posted by Lillydale
after establishing you have these costly videos and I do not, so who is the fool?
Originally posted by Lillydale
and then some lame joke about doing nails.
Originally posted by Lillydale
I guess I will save my energy for someone that actually has some real information to impart and not ignorant insults.