posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 11:34 AM
To illustrate my point I'm going to look at Project Camelot, (on the basis that I believe many of you will have watched some of their interviews) but
the trend seems to me to be all to common.
The interviews are in many cases highly seductive, covering fascinating topics and revealing the kind of informaton we love hearing about. I've heard
the counter-arguments and debunks and digested them, but there is something that annoys the hell out of me in a very subjective and human way.
They seem to be incapable of saying, "I don't know."
Now, I understand that in a few fields, it is highly possible to have overturned the stones of some kind of conspiracy. But no matter where the
interview goes -- unerringly -- they seem comfortable that their experiences are adequate in answering everything. They pass condescending judgement
on others of their kind. From Bob Dean, to Wilcock, to Greer, the trend sets my teeth on edge.
From MK Ultra and Project Talent, to Serpo, to Andromeda and back. They've had a hand in it all. It angers me, because in my mind it makes them less
believeable than any logical argument.
I must seem slightly manic, perhaps I'm the only one to roll their eyes whenever the interview becomes schizophrenic and the interviewee is more than
willing to illuminate his experiences on all fronts as if he had lived a thousand lives.