It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Helmkat
Very confused.
Isn't this a dup of this thread?DNC
Originally posted by DemonicAngelZero
I can Fake Obama's signature (or Orly Taitz for that matter) well enough to fool people. No one signs their signature exactly the same way every time. That variation makes it easier to forge a signature and be believed. All you need is a sample.
Originally posted by Common Good
reply to post by TrueAmerican
"The RNC "Official Certification of Nomination " for John McCain and Sarah Palin reads, and I quote:
"We do hereby certify that a national convention of Delegates representing the Republican Party of the United States, duly held and convened in the city of Saint Paul, State of Minnesota, on September 4, 2008, the following person, meeting the constitutional requirements for the Office of President of the United States, and the following person, meeting the constitutional requirements for the Office of Vice President of the Unites States, were nominated for such offices to be filled at the ensuing general election, November 4, 2008, viz;"
"
This one at least states that McCain and Palin met the constitutional requirements. The DNC paperwork has OBVIOUSLY been changed to(like one poster earlier said)cover thier ass.
Man oh man this is baaaad news for Obama. I dont know what rabbit hes gunna pull out of the hat this time.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Originally posted by Helmkat
Very confused.
Isn't this a dup of this thread?DNC
At ATS, we have a two thread rule that one thread can be in BAN, while another can be on another part of the board. I will rarely, if ever do this, but with this story being so important, I wanted to be sure and get max exposure for the subject.
Originally posted by skycopilot
Sounds like you are ASSuming a lot - and you know the old saying about those who assume...
Originally posted by Shadowflux
If both documents are real, then the only reason to remove that clause would be to protect one's self from accusations of perjury, such a move would indicate prior knowledge of Obama's ineligibility.
EDIT: In my opinion the signatures are a very good match, if not identical in some places.
EDIT: Upon closer inspection, comparing Pelosi's signature to other known signatures, the construction of one of the principal letters is very different:
I would think that the basic construction of principal letters in a signature would be somewhat standard or uniform across multiple samples of the same person. In my opinion, the construction is very different, even the basic construction and direction of strokes on the "P" is different.
Document 1
Document 2
[edit on 11-9-2009 by Shadowflux]
Originally posted by DemonicAngelZero
reply to post by tyranny22
Hostile, aren't we? It's not about being an iron clad near perfect forgery. It's about being just barely good enough to fool people who already want to believe it, who have no formal training in identifying forgeries. We're all looking for things that agree with our current belief system. How many people here on ATS have fallen for hoaxes? The Alex Jones thing is a good example. Many people were raving about how great it was, believing it to be real. The only evidence they had that it was real was the article itself and its creator. How many times have religious people believed wholeheartedly a religious oriented prediction, only to have it be wrong?
Like I said, people can draw many conclusions from the same evidence. You've drawn yours, I've drawn mine. If you want to get hostile and try attacking me, go for it. I'm not going to return the sentiment, so it should be easy for you to lash out at me. Have fun and good luck!
Originally posted by Nichiren
JB Williams will have a nice surprise visit from the FBI tomorrow morning. Forgery of Madam Speaker's signature is a serious crime.
I'm done with this sister BS thread.
Dondero continued, “Since 9/11 Paul has become a complete nutcase conspiratorialist quasi-Anti-Semitic leftwing American-hating nutball.”
These were strong words from a former aide to Mr. Paul (from 1997 – 2003) and words worthy of investigation in my mind. So I decided to investigate, which in politics always means, follow the money.
Where is all that money coming from?
Upon investigation, it appears that Mr. Dondero is exactly right. Much of Ron Paul’s money is not coming from mainstream Libertarians or Republicans.