It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mr.insidious
is it really news to you that the government is trying to kill you? they have been trying to kill your ass for years.
Originally posted by gemineye
reply to post by In nothing we trust
I'm sorry, but I'm just not buying it. If swine flu (or any other communicable disease) is supposed to be so deadly, it doesn't make sense that the victims would be buried. It would make far more sense to just cremate the bodies and be done with it.
Originally posted by son of total newbie
reply to post by Moshpet
I was curious as to what might be used in a mass grave as an accellerant.
Gas and kerosene give off too much smoke and fumes. Has anyone seen stockpiles of 90% wood alcohol? This burns clean, no smoke or fumes. It would take a lot of it. Storage cannisters would be obvious.
Originally posted by gemineye
I'm sorry, but I'm just not buying it. If swine flu (or any other communicable disease) is supposed to be so deadly, it doesn't make sense that the victims would be buried. It would make far more sense to just cremate the bodies and be done with it.
Originally posted by ravenshadow13
Cremation would be a much, much better idea.
For everyone.