It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Psynarchist
reply to post by hooper
Ok true that, SPreston did provide a link that stated that Use of Thermate explains the "Underground Fires"
As far as I'm concerned though, I'd venture to say that it could have been anything BUT jetfuel that brought the towers down in this fashion and cause the metal anomalies we see here, including the lies. This bickering about which kind of Thermite seems a little silly when considering the technological advancement of the military agencies and or whatever other secret agency around.
Could it not be that something similar to thermite was invented without public knowledge, and subsequently used on 911?
We don't know, but going by what we do know there is still plenty of info to suggest an inside job and cover-up. Not to mention motive!
I think you're kind of mixing things up here a bit. Nobody said that jet fuel was the sole source of heat. It started the fires, but there was literally tons and tons of flammable material in those buildings. Then the collapsed building formed a primitive oven and the materials kept burning.
Originally posted by GenRadek
reply to post by SPreston
Once again SPreston, spouting off nonsensical techno-jargon without having a clue as to what the heck he is saying.
There is no such thing as a steel box I-beam. Its either an I-beam, or a box beam. You cannot, repeat, cannot mix the two up.
For those truly interested in facts and truth, here is a steel box beam:
www.alibaba.com...
Here is an I-beam:
www.quality-fabrication.com...
Notice the key differences. [guote]
What a load of jack jaw smoke and mirror show you have here.
It doesn't matter what sp calls the damn thing what you post as links are in no way similar.
Quickly put your cape over all three objects THREE your two and SPrestons
Presto changeo a Box I beam appears for the audience!
Originally posted by SPreston
There were 47 such box columns welded together forming a core structure over 1000 feet high in each tower. As you state, the box columns at the bottom were much heavier and stronger, having to support much more mass, than those higher up.
These 47 box columns were embedded hundreds of feet into the bedrock below the 7 story basement levels.
NIST Core Column Data
The steel wide flange I-beams that comprise a portion of the column sections have standard dimensions. The data for most of those column sections is collected in this table. Note that a slight translation is needed to go from the NIST naming convention to the table. For example, the section 14WF665F36 can be located in the first row of the steel wide flange i beams table which is labeled as W14x665. At this time, the table does not cover all of the wide flange beam sections found in the columns.
source
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Psynarchist
But I thought the argument was that the alledge "pools of molten metal" were the direct result of the alledged use of thermite/thermate and could have no other alledged source? My question is simply - how did that much thermite/mate get into the WTC in the alleged first place?
Originally posted by GenRadek
reply to post by Donny 4 million
Ah so it does not matter the proper terms being used for construction? I see, and do you understand the ramifications of being ignorant?
There are BIG differences between a box-beam and an I-beam. If he wants to be credible in his accusations, he'd better be using proper terminology. Why? because sometimes what happens is others just as ignorant, or uninformed will come across his words and then go off spouting the same misinformation. You cannot mix and match words as you see fit and think no one will know the difference. And such dishonesty puts the whole credibility issue at stake.[edit on 8/20/2009 by GenRadek]
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Originally posted by SPreston
There were 47 such box columns welded together forming a core structure over 1000 feet high in each tower. As you state, the box columns at the bottom were much heavier and stronger, having to support much more mass, than those higher up.
Actually, the core columns were box columns at the bottom, and transitioned into H-beams (not I-beams) part way up. here's a reference: wtcmodel.wikidot.com... click on whatever column you choose to look at,and it'll take you to a gif that runs through the entire height of the building.
These 47 box columns were embedded hundreds of feet into the bedrock below the 7 story basement levels.
Hundreds of feet? I don't think so. I read what your link said, but I believe he's in error. You'll be hard pressed to find anyone else that'll agree with that statement. Bedrock was about 70' from the surface. So they might have drilled down a little, but hundreds of feet? C'mon now, don't be ridiculous....
Originally posted by hooper
Are we now saying that the material that has been described as "molten" is now definetly steel? When was that determination made?