It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SwatMedic
Originally posted by C0bzz
F-117 was retired with no replacement. I think the F-35 will be the replacement in the long term, with the role partially covered short term with stand-off munitions like JASSM and JSOW. F-14 was "replaced" by the F/A-18E/F, though it is rather a slow strike aircraft rather than a fleet defense interceptor like the F-14 was. The F-35 will replace the F-16, F/A-18A/B/C/D, and Harrier - maybe A-10 in a few decades.
What are the plans for filling in the gap between now and then?
Upgrading the newest F-15's.
[edit on 22/7/2009 by C0bzz]
So...is this sufficient? Do you know which planes are still in production...meaning are we still cranking out F-15's or upgrading old ones already in the stable?
What a day, first RAAF Super Hornet flies and the US Senate cancell the F-22A... Not a good day to be a card carrying member of Air Power Australia!
Abraham Gubler
Originally posted by C0bzz
reply to post by Ridhya
Nothing to shoot down in Iraq and Afghanistan. It's pretty much theoretical how well it would do in an actual fight.
Originally posted by on_yur_6
USA uses the Navy to keep the sea lanes open.
And this BS about the F-35 replacing the A-10? Get serious!
You have to be a complete idiot to believe that.
We're losing SKILLED technicians in some critical areas once this line is closed.
When a firefight goes on for hours, and not ONE SINGLE A-10, and not ONE SINGLE APACHE is available, then we may want to rethink the F-35's all purpose promise.
same thing with the F-111. It was a do-everything DO NOTHING.
We need A-10 replacements, and we need the high-end F-22's, and fewer of the middle-road crap.
We/Allies aren't bying F-35s "just in case" like how people are saying we should do with the F-22. The actual demand exist for missions the F-35 performs. They are happening everyday in the CENTCOM AOR and off the decks of USN Carriers.
DarthAmerica on f-16 dot net.
when it come to artillery system that need to be replaced he stopping funding
the air dominance fighter f22 he stop funding altogether
going to stop plans for the ddg100 destroyers witch and stop any threat from an ememy to an aircraft carrier
the air dominance fighter f22 he stop funding altogether
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Originally posted by on_yur_6
Back on topic. Where Russia, China, and India can hurt us is engagements near their territory. Our carriers are amazing but one carrier wouldn't last long off the shores of Russia, China, or India.
How about don't go invading their territory then...
Your country is skint. Spending in the US is about to nose-dive... big time. Alot of people will have an awful lot of readjusting to do, both in attitude and lifestyle.
" The F-22 is turning out to be the American Mig-25 Foxbat for those old enough to remember the effect that aircraft had. A phenominally awesome fighter but designed for very specific roles."
-DarthAmerica