It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Aldrin thinks NASA can do better. His plan: Scrap Ares I, stretch out the remaining six shuttle flights and fast-track the Orion to fly on a Delta IV or Atlas V. Then set our sites on colonizing Mars.
Originally posted by Kaytagg
Although, I think it would be preferable to cut some of the more frivolous expenses out of the bloated annual trillion dollar defense budget to pay for it instead
the U.S. space agency has neither announced nor denied any desire to mine helium-3, it has nevertheless placed advocates of mining He3 in influential positions. For its part, Russia claims that the aim of any lunar program of its own--for what it's worth, the rocket corporation Energia recently started blustering, Soviet-style, that it will build a permanent moon base by 2015-2020--will be extracting He3.
The Chinese, too, apparently believe that helium-3 from the moon can enable fusion plants on Earth. This fall, the People's Republic expects to orbit a satellite around the moon and then land an unmanned vehicle there in 2011.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Originally posted by Kaytagg
Although, I think it would be preferable to cut some of the more frivolous expenses out of the bloated annual trillion dollar defense budget to pay for it instead
Leave the defense budget alone. I have a better idea.
How about removing all the frivolous spending and expenses out of Obama's bloated MULTI-TRILLION dollar bailouts/government takeovers/liberal policies?
The government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) are a group of financial services corporations created by the United States Congress. Their function is to enhance the flow of credit to targeted sectors of the economy and to make those segments of the capital market more efficient and transparent. The desired effect of the GSEs is to enhance the availability and reduce the cost of credit to the targeted borrowing sectors: agriculture, home finance and education. Congress created the first GSE in 1916 with the creation of the Farm Credit System; it initiated GSEs in the home finance segment of the economy with the creation of the Federal Home Loan Banks in 1932; and it targeted education when it chartered Sallie Mae in 1972 (although Congress allowed Sallie Mae to relinquish its government sponsorship and become a fully private institution via legislation in 1995). The residential mortgage borrowing segment is by far the largest of the borrowing segments in which the GSEs operate. Together, the three mortgage finance GSEs (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks) have several trillion dollars of on-balance sheet assets. The federal government possesses warrants which, if exercised, would allow them to take a 79.9% ownership share in the companies. The federal government has not currently exercised these warrants.
Other corporations owned by the federal government include the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (which does business as Amtrak), the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, American International Group (AIG), General Motors, and the United States Postal Service. Many states have government owned businesses for operations as well (e.g. North Dakota Mill and Elevator or South Dakota Public Broadcasting). Generally speaking, a statute passed by a legislature specifically sets up a government owned company in order to undertake a specific public purpose with public funds or public property.
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
fas.org...
Most of these corporations have a history of socializing losses while privatizing profits, even before the Mortgage meltdown, such as Amtrak.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Buzz has a point!
The phrase "Been There......Done That" rings a bell.
Is Buzz correct? Should we skip the Moon and go straight to Mars?
Perhaps there is more to the story than NASA is admitting regarding going back to the Moon. With all the interest in the Moon lately from other countries and now NASA wanting to go back there, perhaps something is up.
What could it be? Could it be about energy, ie Helium 3?
www.foxnews.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by solidshot
Personally I think we need to go to the moon and set up a permanent base there and use this as a stepping stone to Mars and beyond, the way we are slowly destroying our planet means that we will need to find a new home sooner than many think and this will ultimately only happen by going out into deep space. For this to happen we really need to start investing in new forms of propulsion as well as ways to protects craft from small debris that flies through space as well?
Originally posted by Kaytagg
It would be nice if Obama were a liberal. Pure fantasy, though.
There is no "government takeover" going on. That's basically a delusion
Still think we should "leave it alone?"
Could it be that dear old Buzz doesn't want the truth revealed that NASA has been lieing to us, along with the compliance of those astronauts who continue to tell us that they discovered nothing of great importance?
Originally posted by kinda kurious
Congratulations WhatTheory.
Under the guise of a NASA thread, you were able to redirect into your typical Bash Obama vitriol in only 3 posts.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Originally posted by kinda kurious
Congratulations WhatTheory.
Under the guise of a NASA thread, you were able to redirect into your typical Bash Obama vitriol in only 3 posts.
... I guess you just happened to overlook the fact that I was responding to a poster or as usual you intentionally are disengenuous.