It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vasaga
Why would God, [who's infinite in all aspects (including time space etc.), who can create humans like Adam and Eve, all knowing, perfect] ;
1) Create you while he knows you would be going to hell because of your own choices
2) Send a prophet at one time instead of giving each individual a direct source of truth at any given moment ( I actually believe he did do that...)
3) Want worship
4) Punish you for trying to use what he gave you
5) Feel human emotions like anger, disappointment etc.
6) By being all knowing and, still have the same approach with his spread of religions, knowing the majority will go to hell in the end
I don't agree. Assuming he's omniscient and independent of time and space, he already knows what he has created and what you are gonna choose using your free will. He created you so he knows all your strengths and weaknesses etc. That means, he knows what your life's gonna be like and what your choices are gonna be. So he also knows if you will go to hell or not. Why create you, if he already knows you'll end up in hell? We might have the opportunity, but he already knows the answer, so it's not really an opportunity, but more like he wanted to burn some people..
Originally posted by miriam0566
the bible says the punishment for sin is death (non-existance) but i get your point.
its not about god knowing or not. he created us with free-will. as such we all have the opportunity to decide our fate. just because we may end up on the bad side of the ruling, doesnt mean that the choice wasnt ours
Love and just. Sometimes those two collide and you can't be both at the same time. How does God handle that? And this is also unfair, i mean, two people do something, and then, all people are guilty. That is against logic and actually primitive. It's like ancient times where the father that was fisherman had a kid, and that kid would also become a fisherman etc and the legacy was passed on. Also if the father was a murderer, they would be more careful of the kid because he would also turn into a murderer. That's actually the kind of thinking done here, which i think is pretty much flawed, because everyone is an individual and they might choose differently. Besides, an omniscient God would have to "test" anything, especially if the isrealites would want it or not because he would already know.
when adam and eve sinned, they rejected god. they decided that from that moment on, they wanted to govern themselves, to know ¨right and wrong¨. god gave them exactly what they wanted. from then on, close personal relationship with god was lost and had to be regained.
yes god is love, but his is also just. to communicate with man, god chose certain channels.
remember too that the isrealites were spoken to directly, but they didnt want it. they told moses to speak to god for them.
The best way to worship is imo to use your abilities to your highest potential, because that's what God/Nature/whatever has given you, and you are the only person on earth who can use it, so do so.
this argument is an oxymoron. supposedly god is not human like in any way and is above worship. but at the same time the possibility that he might actually DESERVE worship is never brought up
Uh.. I was referring mainly to logic here. Religion doesn't allow you to use it, so if religion was truly what God wanted, he would be punishing you for using your logic.
god never punishes us for using what he gave us. he punishes us for using what he gave us when we use it for something other than its original purpose.
fornication is an example. god designed us to have sex. however he intended it to be between a husband and a wife. using you sexual desires to have sex with a dog would be using it against its original purpose.
one should not assume that just because one desires something, that that desire is from god.
Few lines above you said God is nothing human like, but nvm. I'm not assuming that, I'm assuming a perfect being, and such a being would not be angry and especially not disappointed (omniscience..).
two parts.
1- who says they are human emotions? your assuming that we make god in our image, isnt that just alittle arrogant? the bible says its the other way around. we are made in god´s image.
Funny how the examples you actually give are for human use. God would have no benefit from those emotions at all imo.. You can't be angry at something you created and knowing all about it at the same time, nor can you be disappointed by it. Same argument again...
2- anger has a purpose when used correctly. it is a motivating factor when dealing with injustice. disappointment can help the erring one to be more careful. a child may pay more attention to a lesson that their parents are trying to teach them because they dont want to disappoint them.
all negative emotions have their purpose and place. when used correctly and balanced. just because most of us are unbalance in our display of these emotions doesnt mean that god would not have them
I again don't agree. I think the world today is the product of humans being childish. By that i mean, they don't want to take responsibility for themselves and they act like something else needs to take care of them, be it God, the church, the government, money, whatever. Combine that with some people's ambition for manipulation and power, and the other childish people would gladly listen. The amount of childish people is much greater than the ones who want power over the planet, and that's the problem. If people would wake up and take responsibility for themselves instead of other things taking care of them, the world would not be as it is today. Has nothing to do with God's will not being followed, it has to do with using your abilities instead of letting others tell you what to do, and this includes religion.
the spread or religions is not god´s doing. mankind has always been confronted with the idea that sometimes they just dont care what god thinks. many religions are created with the motivation of doing things ¨their way¨. some were even created as a means of living. it makes me wonder just how many churches open because it was a source of easy income (not so much anymore)
as i said before, man wanted to rule themselves, and allowed it to prove a point. so we could see with our own eyes just how rubbish we are at deciding for ourselves. the world as you see it today is the baby that was born from that decision.
Originally posted by vasaga
1) Create you while he knows you would be going to hell because of your own choices
2) Send a prophet at one time instead of giving each individual a direct source of truth at any given moment ( I actually believe he did do that...)
3) Want worship
4) Punish you for trying to use what he gave you
5) Feel human emotions like anger, disappointment etc.
6) By being all knowing and, still have the same approach with his spread of religions, knowing the majority will go to hell in the end
9 And he said unto them, He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.
10 And when he was alone, they that were about him with the twelve asked of him the parable.
11 And he said unto them, Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them that are without, all these things are done in parables:
Originally posted by balrathamir
Simply put it was done in a way at the time to make people think about what was said. Those with an understanding of the truth would see the parable for what it is. With out that, they would simply be a nice story.
Originally posted by CrlJester
That's interesting too, because while their going through the trouble of making this story into an enigma, not a very big one mind you, that people of ancient civilization were trying their damnedest to learn how to read! So why put puzzles in literature when the common carpenter couldn't read let alone understand what he was reading?
Originally posted by balrathamir
1. Truth taught to the people
2. Acceptance of the Truth
3. Increase in prosperity and Wealth
4. Increase in wickedness and sin
5. Forcably reminded of thier wickedness and who to turn to (be that by a Prophet, an event or some other means)
6. Repentance and repeat.
Right now I see the world between step 4 and 5.
Originally posted by vasaga
I don't agree. Assuming he's omniscient and independent of time and space, he already knows what he has created and what you are gonna choose using your free will. He created you so he knows all your strengths and weaknesses etc. That means, he knows what your life's gonna be like and what your choices are gonna be. So he also knows if you will go to hell or not. Why create you, if he already knows you'll end up in hell? We might have the opportunity, but he already knows the answer, so it's not really an opportunity, but more like he wanted to burn some people..
Love and just. Sometimes those two collide and you can't be both at the same time. How does God handle that? And this is also unfair, i mean, two people do something, and then, all people are guilty. That is against logic and actually primitive. It's like ancient times where the father that was fisherman had a kid, and that kid would also become a fisherman etc and the legacy was passed on. Also if the father was a murderer, they would be more careful of the kid because he would also turn into a murderer. That's actually the kind of thinking done here, which i think is pretty much flawed, because everyone is an individual and they might choose differently. Besides, an omniscient God would have to "test" anything, especially if the isrealites would want it or not because he would already know.
Uh.. I was referring mainly to logic here. Religion doesn't allow you to use it, so if religion was truly what God wanted, he would be punishing you for using your logic.
Besides, your example for using it for something else that's not intended is not that logical at all. Our feet were made for walking. It wasn't made to kick a ball, so if you kick a ball you are going against it's purpose so against God's will? There are tons of other examples. I'm sure your hair was not made for cutting, your hands were not made for counting or pointing or typing, your nose was not made for picking it etc.
Few lines above you said God is nothing human like, but nvm.
I'm not assuming that, I'm assuming a perfect being, and such a being would not be angry and especially not disappointed (omniscience..).
Funny how the examples you actually give are for human use. God would have no benefit from those emotions at all imo.. You can't be angry at something you created and knowing all about it at the same time, nor can you be disappointed by it. Same argument again...
I again don't agree. I think the world today is the product of humans being childish. By that i mean, they don't want to take responsibility for themselves and they act like something else needs to take care of them, be it God, the church, the government, money, whatever.
Has nothing to do with God's will not being followed, it has to do with using your abilities instead of letting others tell you what to do, and this includes religion.
Lastly, I'm not intending to insult anyone, just giving my point of view.
Well I was basically referring to what people are usually being told in churches, not necessarily the bible itself. And to your example, no Sarah is not responsible, because she did not make you. If someone makes an atomic bomb, and it explodes, knowing it would explode, you can not say it’s the atomic bomb’s fault, but the person who made the bomb. Though the atomic bomb does not have a free will, you knew it was gonna explode, and God knows humans were gonna sin when he created them in the first place. Since he’s omnischient he knows it for every single individual… And also, if you have a free will, you shouldn’t be punished for what you do, because that’s not really being free is it?
Originally posted by miriam0566the thing about hellfire is that its not ……………………………… a particular way of life does not automatically mean that he is responsible for that decision.
Sin is not something you possess. Sin might be an action, or a thought. About the “Christ died for our sins” part, it wasn’t about his death. It was about how he lived and what he taught. His death was only a very small part of the whole message. And that’s assuming the story is completely true, which I don’t believe it is since the Romans manipulated the whole thing. Rising from death part.. I have no comment on. But I think, that if you use your head, you will know what the right way is, and you don’t need to worship anybody to do the right thing. People are going to church to sing “the blood of Jesus saved me” while they’re still living their lives as sheep and judging others for not being Christians..
alcoholism can pass genetically. so can diabetes.
your right, it is unfair when a child receives some sort of handicap from their parents. god of course sees this unfairness also which is why christ was provided. christ didnt die so that adam could live, he died so that adam's offspring might live. in this respect, we are able to live despite this hereditary sin we possess.
this is not primitive, its fair.
Yes, I say so. It’s not illogical at all. It’s not “certain” religions, it’s more like “most of the” religions. The whole story being told is usually not even exactly like that in the bible.. And besides, the story being told is based on more assumptions than any other argument. The bible is a factual book, as in, it’s what people truly believed and wrote in the past, and that includes the “banned” apocrypha, but it’s still a book to approach rationally, and not emotionally, almost all religions do approach emotionally.
says who? you?
just because certain religions shun thinking doesnt mean they all do. your assertion in itself is illogical
Uh.. A knife is a useful tool yes, and is intended for cutting. Cutting a person with a knife, you are still using the knife’s main purpose, which is cutting. That it’s immoral is something else. That has nothing to do with the purpose of the knife at all. Let’s take a Katana (samurai sword) then. The purpose of it was to kill. So if you use it to cut fruit, it would be bad.. no no it’s not logical. Sorry.
a knife is a very useful tool that can make life easier, but using that same knife to murder someone would be using that knife in way that it was not intended to be used.
the argument is very logical
LOL you would be amazed how much stuff in our daily lives are assumptions. Nothing illogical about it. Every single logical argument starts with an assumption. Not to mention religion.. And besides, what I assumed, is what God is usually defined by.. Perfection. That’s it.
assuming without evidence to back the assumption is illogical.
“Tolerating”. Interesting word. That word actually means to endure something you don’t want to. But how can God not want to endure it, if He is the one that allows evil the exist in the first place? He is the creator of all remember? That includes good AND evil.
on the contrary. anger would prevent god from tolerating evil indefinitely. disappointment would motivate god's servants who have sinned to correct their course.
Bingo (bold part) and no no no (italic part). It’s not about emotions. It’s about spiritual understanding. The emotional part is material. The spiritual understanding is what God (mayB Christ if you want to) is all about, and not about the emotions.
if god lacked emotions (lets face it, if he lacks negative emotions, then likely he lacks positive too) then a close personal relationship with him would be impossible. yet this is exactly what god implores us to have. our obedience to his commandments would be mechanical. it would also mean that his commandments (which are based on love) would be illogical.
agreed, but these are also human emotions, which are basically chemical, and not spiritual. Besides, God would not disappoint, he’s perfect right?
part of having love is the fear of disappointing the one you love. if you never have experienced this, then you have never loved.
Agree with this part
i agree with the point of being childish. a child wants ……~…….its a "kink" in the human psyche that is to blame. this need to do things our way, for our benefit.
Though this part might be true, and I think I agree with, we being here is God’s will. We being like we are is God’s will. Everything that exists, is God’s will, because if you can create something that God does not want, he’s not almighty, because you are interfering with his work. So pain, suffering and death, is part of God’s will, otherwise it would not exist. When Jesus said love God, he could’ve meant, love everything that exists, and love your neighbour as yourself, he could’ve meant, treat everyone else as a respected individual, just like you yourself are. You can’t go against God’s will..
it has everything to do with god's will not being followed. the proof lies in the consequences that persist from those commandments not being followed.
jesus was asked what the 2 highest commandments were. he responded with love god (his father) with everything you are, and love your neighbor as your self. then he said that the whole law hangs on these 2 commandments.
the entire motive of the law is not to control people for the sheer novelty of it, it is to have people love the things around them.
when that is not followed, you get pain, suffering and death.
Though this part might be true, and I think I agree with, we being here is God’s will. We being like we are is God’s will. Everything that exists, is God’s will, because if you can create something that God does not want, he’s not almighty, because you are interfering with his work. So pain, suffering and death, is part of God’s will, otherwise it would not exist. When Jesus said love God, he could’ve meant, love everything that exists, and love your neighbour as yourself, he could’ve meant, treat everyone else as a respected individual, just like you yourself are. You can’t go against God’s will..
Sin is not something you possess. Sin might be an action, or a thought. About the “Christ died for our sins” part, it wasn’t about his death. It was about how he lived and what he taught. His death was only a very small part of the whole message. And that’s assuming the story is completely true, which I don’t believe it is since the Romans manipulated the whole thing. Rising from death part.. I have no comment on. But I think, that if you use your head, you will know what the right way is, and you don’t need to worship anybody to do the right thing.
People are going to church to sing “the blood of Jesus saved me” while they’re still living their lives as sheep and judging others for not being Christians..