It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The International Criminal Court (ICC) yesterday issued an arrest warrant for Sudan’s President Omar al-Bashir on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Darfur. Today, the AP reports that, based on the legal principles the ICC used to arrest al-Bashir, former President George W. Bush could be next on the list:
David Crane, an international law professor at Syracuse University, said the principle of law used to issue an arrest warrant for Omar al-Bashir could extend to former US President Bush over claims officials from his Administration may have engaged in torture by using coercive interrogation techniques on terror suspects. Crane is a former prosecutor of the Sierra Leone tribunal that indicted Liberian President Charles Taylor and put him on trial in The Hague.
The US did not sign the ICC-enabling Rome treaty in 1998. President Clinton did sign at the end of his term, but President Bush repealed it. The Hague invasion act, passed under Sen. Jesse Helm's Foreign Relations Committee, calls for "all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any US or allied personnel being detained or imprisoned by … the International Criminal Court."
Ex-UN prosecutor: Bush may be next up for International Criminal Court
An ex-UN prosecutor has said that following the issuance of an arrest warrant for the president of Sudan, former US President George W. Bush could -- and should -- be next on the International Criminal Court's list.
The former prosecutor's assessment was echoed in some respect by United Nations General Assembly chief Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann, of Nicaragua, who said America's military occupation of Iraq has caused over a million deaths and should be probed by the United Nations.
In twelve instances, the United States has engaged in extended military engagements that were explicitly authorized by Congress, short of a formal declaration of war.
.................
Iraq War, also known as Operation Iraqi Freedom Iraq H.J. Res. 114,
October 16, 2002 77-23 296-133 Ongoing
Rights group criticizes France's terrorism strategy
By Elaine Sciolino Published: July 2, 2008
PARIS: France's much-praised system of using sweeping arrests and aggressive interrogations and prosecutions to combat terrorism violates the rule of law and prevents suspects from receiving a fair trial, according to a human rights report released Wednesday.
France prides itself on having the most efficient counterterrorism strategy in Europe. French counterterrorism officials insist that the flexibility of French law and the French judicial system has been crucial in their ability to respond to the threat of international terrorism and has helped prevent attacks on French soil.
.......
Originally posted by Foppezao
Why not? Bush is planning to do a tour around the world with lectures, once across the borders we can at least arrest him[and Cheney, Rumsfeld]...i think we can take good care of him here in The Hague
Prosecuting him could be a good example, for al the hundreds of thousands of people tortured and without prosecution held captive...
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Originally posted by Foppezao
Why not? Bush is planning to do a tour around the world with lectures, once across the borders we can at least arrest him[and Cheney, Rumsfeld]...i think we can take good care of him here in The Hague
Prosecuting him could be a good example, for al the hundreds of thousands of people tortured and without prosecution held captive...
Could you show proof of these "hundreds of thousands of people tortured"?.... Or is this just a claim of yours?
Those people that were detained were fighting against U.S. and allied forces...they were not "innocent"...and most of them were not even iraqis, as most insurgents are from Saudi Arabia and other nations who went to fight the U.S. and allied forces because they are terrorists.
[edit on 8-3-2009 by ElectricUniverse]
Originally posted by ragman
Though, the cynical part of me would find some humor, the grotesque type, if Bush were hung only shortly after Saddam was. Though, I would unfortunately have to take up arms against the individuals who do this to my former Commander-in-Chief. And, that is no joke-- unless you find some Nixon-like tapes having him laugh about killing Iraqis or prove he's a reptile, I will defend him to the grave.
Originally posted by DimensionalDetective
Hilarious. Pot meet kettle.
Most of them were not Iraqis, eh? Could you show proof of that, or is this just a claim of YOURS?
And yes, the vast majority of the tens of thousands of people killed and maimed over there WERE innocent. They were subject to an invasion and occupation of their country based on NOTHING BUT LIES. So they had EVERY RIGHT to defend their country from a foreign intruder that was occupying their land based on totally false premises and accusations.
And the people who signed off on these WAR CRIMES need to spend the rest of their lives behind bars for their crimes against humanity-period.
Most foreign fighters and suicide bombers in Iraq come from Saudi Arabia, despite attempts by US officials to portray Syria and Iran as the main culprits of violence, a US newspaper reported Sunday.
Citing an unnamed senior US military officer and Iraqi lawmakers, the Los Angeles Times newspaper said about 45 percent of all foreign militants targeting US troops and Iraqi security forces were from Saudi Arabia, 15 percent from Syria and Lebanon, and 10 percent from North Africa
Official US military figures made available to The Times also show that nearly half of the 135 foreigners in US detention facilities in Iraq are Saudis, the report said.
Fighters from Saudi Arabia are thought to have carried out more suicide bombings than those of any other nationality, the paper said.
.........
Most Tribes in Anbar Agree to Unite Against Insurgents
By KHALID AL-ANSARY and ALI ADEEB
Published: September 18, 2006
BAGHDAD, Sept. 17 — Nearly all the tribes from Iraq’s volatile Sunni-dominated Anbar Province have agreed to join forces and fight Al Qaeda insurgents and other foreign-backed “terrorists,” an influential tribal leader said Sunday. Iraqi government leaders encouraged the movement.
Twenty-five of about 31 tribes in Anbar, a vast, mostly desert region that stretches westward from Baghdad to the borders of Syria, Jordan and Saudi Arabia, have united against insurgents and gangs that are “killing people for no reason,” said the tribal leader, Sheik Abdul Sattar Buzaigh al-Rishawi.
............
Iraqis defy insurgents in huge voter turnout
By Hannah Allam and Tom Lasseter
Knight Ridder Newspapers
BAGHDAD, Iraq — Yesterday was a rare day of jubilation in this war-weary nation.
Although the exact numbers were not certain, it appeared a surprise majority of eligible Iraqis cast ballots in their first independent elections in half a century, defying the insurgency that tried to silence them with a barrage of attacks, mostly suicide bombings, that killed 44 Iraqis and two U.S. Marines yesterday.
Voters danced in the streets and let out shrill cries of joy. They wiped away tears and hugged their children. They risked death and celebrated with chocolates.
............
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Most people don't seem to understand that the UN, turning on Bush, alongside the presidents and PMs of other countries, was a smooth move done for the world to ignore the UN Oil For Food Program Scandal.
There was a lot of evidence pointing to the fact that several officials in the UN, entire governments in the UN, and including UN boss Kofi Annan's son, Kojo was involved in this scandal.
The program was supposed to give aid to Iraqis in exchange for oil from Iraq, but in fact Iraq was recieving banned military weaponry, in exchange for oil.
This scandal involved important people from around the world that were getting rich, meanwhile Iraqis were not recieving the aid they were supposed to get, and were dying because of this. Not to mention the banned military equipment being send to Iraq, when UN sanctions prohibited this.
The whole argument that the war was illegal, is only a red herring being used as a political tool by people who simply don't like Republicans, and decided to turn their hatred towards one man, and one administration.
The Iraqi war was a "military engagement authorized by Congress", and was perfectly legal.
Throughout the history of the U.S. several times have "military engagements authorized by Congress" been done, without making a formal declaration of war.
...
As for the charges of torturing insurgents? American lives were saved by this, and it is ironic that several countries which are part of the UN are dictatorships in which worse things happen, yet nothing is done against these nations.
...
BTW, if ex-president Bush was to be prosecuted for torture, then the same should be done in every country where this has been happening...
...
Fighting a war against an enemy that is willing to kill himself/herself to kill infidels, and which resort to behead people and record the beheadings, when we know these people are not going to give information that could save lives on their own free will, leaves only one choice whether you like it or not.
War is always, and will always be savage, whether it conflicts with the sensitivities of those who have no idea of what war is, and even if it is used as a political tool by certain groups.