It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I just don't understand someone making ANY kind of link between this "baby addict" and Angelina Jolie.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
I brought it up so of course you can't see it.
It's rather obvious. Both are baby collectors. One can afford it and one can't. But both are baby collectors. Angelina has said in the press that she wants a dozen children from different countries. That's baby collecting.
Oh .. and her twins were an 'on purpose' multiple birth. They did it InVitro and tried for twins on purpose. She has been quoted as saying she'd do it again.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
reply to post by Valhall
Absolutely. I agree with you.
As i said - both are baby collectors. One can afford it. One can't.
But both are definately baby collectors. It's easy to see the comparison.
I still don't understand what doctor would do this. A single mother who already has 6 children all under the age of 8 ... and she wants 8 more kids. I think the medical profession should review his license. Something smells fishy ....
Originally posted by Averysmallfoxx
My wife is a nurse and in the training she underwent to become one, specifically it was explained that as a medical practitioner, your moral opinions, good or bad are NOT relevant. His job was done correctly and to the standard which he is expected to observe. His moral opinions may not be of the approving sort for her choices but they don't matter. We need to remember that medical doctors are just that....MEDICAL doctors, they do the job on the body they are expected to and they are NOT accountable for anything more than that.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
reply to post by asmeone2
Lol. I think religion is used as a cover for a wide variety of mental disorders, so you will get no disagreement from me there.
Mind you I am not saying ALL religious people are mentally ill, those who wish to flame.
And, I have been scouring the internet for more information on her financial status. Although there are many, many people claiming that the taxpayers are going to have to foot the bill for this, I have not found one credible source who says that any tax money has been used to date to pay for her or her childbearing business.
So far she is just bankrupting her parents. And it appears that her embryo transferring adventures have something to do with "someone paying her" to do it. Her mother is quoted as saying something like that but no details are given. It sounds really weird and convoluted, and has something to do with the fact that she apparently worked at some fertility clinic. Possibly as an egg donor as someone else said.
I just wanted to say that it does NOT appear that she is sponging off anyone other than her parents at this point. When I first read the story and the surrounding comments both here and on some of the linked sites, I believed she was using tax dollars for this and I wanted to retract that now that I have taken the time to do some fact checking.
Originally posted by Mynaeris
reply to post by nerbot
More interesting is the woman and her family are from Iraq. Is this Iraq's revenge on Americans, or some way of replacing the thousands killed in Iraq through this breeding machine?
Originally posted by sheila947Maybe some black market stuff going on here.
Originally posted by Annee
I think I'll wait for all the real Facts.
In the mean time - I believe these children (all of them) are loved.
Originally posted by spinkyboo
Originally posted by Annee
I think I'll wait for all the real Facts.
In the mean time - I believe these children (all of them) are loved.
It isn't a loving act to fill your household up with in vitro children who do not have parents with time, energy and financial stability to give to their growth.
It is an irresponsible act.