It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Almost 500 years ago, on the wall of the Castle Church in Wittenberg, Germany, Martin Luther posted his 95 Theses, characterizing as "madness" the notion that papal pardons could absolve individuals for their sins. As viewed from Rome, Luther had maligned, even defamed, the church. Luther was eventually excommunicated. His conduct ultimately led to the creation of a Protestant Church in Germany and a Reformation throughout Europe.
It is difficult to believe that in the 21st century anyone would seriously propose that conduct such as Luther's should be deemed illegal. But a few weeks ago, the General Assembly of the United Nations took a giant step in that direction. It adopted - for the fourth straight year - a resolution prepared by the 57-nation Organization of the Islamic Conference calling upon all UN nations to adopt legislation banning the "defamation" of religion. Spurred by the Danish cartoons of 2005, some of which portrayed the Prophet Muhammed in a manner deemed offensive by the OIC, the resolution was opposed by the United States, most European nations, Japan, India and a number of other nations.
Nonetheless, it has now been adopted.
Originally posted by The Last Man on Earth
Anyone who professes to be a follower of religion goes down a notch or two, in my books.
Reason > superstition.
All religion is fair game for criticism.
From an American perspective, the resolution so plainly violates the First Amendment that it is not a close question. Salman Rushdie's "The Satanic Verses," which offended many Muslims, is protected here. So are movies such as Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ," which offended many Jews, and "The Last Temptation of Christ," which offended many Christians.
Originally posted by heyo
wtf? So you're just gonna call me an idiot, just like that?
Originally posted by heyowhat a spineless cheap shot.
Originally posted by heyoOne big difference between guys like me and guys like you is that you're blind to YOUR particular faith.
Originally posted by heyoBut of course, this is two people discussing religion openly with contrasting opinions, and hey, the world hasn't ended. Maybe free speech is okay after all (sarc).
Originally posted by The Last Man on Earth
Originally posted by heyo
wtf? So you're just gonna call me an idiot, just like that?
Are you going to claim evolution doesn't happen?
Originally posted by heyowhat a spineless cheap shot.
What's spineless about coming out with my opinion on a public forum? Surely spinless would be to keep it secret and take snide actions against those I disagree with?
Originally posted by heyoOne big difference between guys like me and guys like you is that you're blind to YOUR particular faith.
I think the biggest difference is that one of us has faith, and the other has evidence.
I don't have a faith, I have nothing I don't want to disbelieve. If someone went to the moon tomorrow and brought back huge lumps of moon cheese, I'd have no problem accepting the moon is made of cheese, but someone claiming that a few thousand years ago, a dusty man came off the deserts having spoken to God? Pure fantasy, I'm afraid.
Even if, and this is a big conditional if, the man HAD spoken to God, the fact that he didn't write it down there and then, combined with the ultimate fallibility of the human memory, leads me to conclude that AT BEST we'd get a fuzzy "er, I fink he said be nice, yeah?" message, and that's it.
Originally posted by heyoBut of course, this is two people discussing religion openly with contrasting opinions, and hey, the world hasn't ended. Maybe free speech is okay after all (sarc).
I don't judge you for your religion, but that you have done nothing to overcome the handicap of being a product of your environment does nothing to raise my opinion of you.
That probably sounds incredibly offensive, but what I mean is, you can listen to the bull and say "yeah, I'm down with that because I don't like to think for myself" or you can climb out of the hole you started in and keep trying for something better than an ancient fairytale.
Look at it objectively; what kind of person would you respect more?