It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Paul was VERY much against the Torah when he opposed it by teaching others to worship a man as god.
Originally posted by L.I.B.
Jesus added a new commandment: That we love one another, which I believe all of Jesus' teachings revolve around.
Originally posted by justamomma
Paul was VERY much against the Torah when he opposed it by teaching others to worship a man as god.
Actually - Jesus didnt add to anything...
Revelations 14:12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.
(conspiracy theory alert) he changed them all anyway!
Nice thread but I would have to disagree with the notion that we are not under Mosaic Law, particularly the 10 commandments.
There are many verses in the KJV Bible that show this many in Red because they reported to be spoken by Christ himself.
The one that comes to mind quickest is the one about the patience of the saints...
Revelations 14:12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.
This tells me that Saints of GOD keep his commandments,...
... but so many want to take the Sabbath out of their version as I see you did.
The Sabbath Law was instituted to Adam in the garden and long before Hebrews and Jews and so it can not be claimed to be only a Jewish Law. Hope this helps you, and I hope you keep in the Word for every day in it is a Good Day..
Good Day to you!
Actually, the commandment was already part of the law.
Deuteronomy 6: 5
And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might.
It was part of the Law and not something that was a new revelation via the teachings of Jesus.
Deuteronomy 30: 6
And the LORD thy God will circumcise thine heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, that thou mayest live.
Isaiah 43: 11
I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no saviour.
G.d got "it" right the first time. We didn't need another savior, another commandment, or another redeemer.
Originally posted by L.I.B. God's messengers are consistent.
Jesus was showing how the letter of the law kills, which it certainly can do... in many, many ways. That very thing is now happening within the church-ianity community and all the self-righteousness.
G.d got "it" right the first time. We didn't need another savior, another commandment, or another redeemer.
Well, I won't say that Jeremiah, Jonah, Abraham, Moses, Daniel and etal were not needed.
Each served a purpose. A divine one.
I have read that the meaning of Jesus' name means: God will save or that salvation is of God.
While God has always got "it" right, mankind always seems to need a push or a pull. To me, Christ helps pull people towards God.
Well, I had clarified my positions on all these points in the same post to which you reply; however, a lot of it was cut off (a fluke of the board that has happened several times to me). I will clarify it again, but not at this moment.
I will also give the reasons why (based on the Torah) Paul was not a messenger of G.d, but will start a new thread as it doesn't pertain to the topic here nor to the topic we met in previously.
And I am doing well. Thank you for the thoughtful words. I do hope that all is good for you too.
Originally posted by L.I.B.
It escapes me how you think you can disqualify Paul based on the Torah, when Paul's teachings were to the gentiles whom were never subject to the Torah (the Mosaic Law/Covenant), but were instead subject only to the noahide covenant.
As I see it Paul's teachings were/are designed to get gentiles prepared to be able to accept G.d's law, which is written upon the heart.
All is as it should be Nasty head cold and all, lol. All prayers for health are gladly accepted!
Say, I was wondering if you had gotten into your Judaic studies far enough yet to be able to share which "name" of G.d is used in the scriptures? Sometimes Adonai, Ancient of Days, and I think there are others that were all translated as G.d. too. I think it makes a difference.
Also, in advance, please forgive me if I ever forget to use G.d when posting to you. I like to be respectful of other's traditions, yet sometimes a habit can be overlooked accidentally especially when my fingers type what I think.
Originally posted by L.I.B.
No problem at all in the waiting for your reply. It was well worth it. Glad that you looked for this thread in it's new location too.
Thank you for sharing the various names. Really enjoyed it. I was wondering... would it be too big of an endeavor to post scripture with the actual appropriate name? Maybe instead there is a book, in English, that you are aware of? I would luv that! Just seems to open up the scriptures even more.
Thats before you get into the moral issues involved, they didn't live in a society anywhere near as complex as this 21century digital world, how could they have made laws which still make sense?
I wonder if the ripping arms off goats law which was extended to cover strangulation could also be extended to cover battery farmed meat, etc?