It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Whats going on at yellowstone?

page: 119
510
<< 116  117  118    120  121  122 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 12:49 PM
link   
Aren't these harmonic tremors?




posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 12:49 PM
link   
I think that after being reviewed by a seismologist the last one might turn out to be bigger than 3.4 magnitude (as picked by the automatic sensor). It also seemed longer than usual.

[edit on 2009/1/2 by Shirakawa]



posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 12:50 PM
link   
www.quake.utah.edu...

yep stronger here than on the other charts it looks

there was a delay in these charts from GEE -

GEE is definitely better and not relying on utah.edu public info

that is good to know



posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 12:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Shirakawa
 



I think you are correct.



posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 12:52 PM
link   
.19 miles depth?
That is awefully close to the surface for one that size

I think it knocked off H17A its flat lined now...mabe an aftershock is due since there is NO movement now on that one.



posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 12:56 PM
link   
why did my GEE go totally gray? no available stations anywhere. The error must be between the keyboard and the chair.



posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 12:56 PM
link   
reply to post by xoxo stacie
 


The escalation in intensity is omething for us to keep a very watchful eye on...for sure!!

How's the media dealing with everything today? Anything new?



posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 12:56 PM
link   
they just listed another one right after the 3.4 saying it'sa 2.5 ..aftershock perhaps?

earthquake.usgs.gov...

2.5
Date-Time

* Friday, January 02, 2009 at 18:48:22 UTC
* Friday, January 02, 2009 at 11:48:22 AM at epicenter

Location 44.541°N, 110.366°W
Depth 0.1 km (~0.1 mile) (poorly constrained)
Region YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING
Distances

* 60 km (37 miles) ESE (103°) from West Yellowstone, M



posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 12:57 PM
link   
I have to laugh - it's like we ask and they provide.

Didn't we just say there weren't any 3.0+ lately.

It's like when we complained about the broken graphs

and about no press releases.

and about the volcano icons (although that went overboard the other way)

I'm beginning to think they are reading this



I'm going to try another ... could you update France on what's happening - every other country in the world is looking at Yellowstone but France has nothing in the papers and I can't get my inlaws to understand why I'm obsessed with this... so... powers that be - please send out another associated press update and send to Le Monde. like you did to UK thanks
see if that works



posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 12:57 PM
link   
Whooo what's going on?
Some repeating realy big hups..



posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 12:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by Telafree
they just listed another one right after the 3.4 saying it'sa 2.5 ..aftershock perhaps?

earthquake.usgs.gov...

2.5
Date-Time

* Friday, January 02, 2009 at 18:48:22 UTC
* Friday, January 02, 2009 at 11:48:22 AM at epicenter

Location 44.541°N, 110.366°W
Depth 0.1 km (~0.1 mile) (poorly constrained)
Region YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING
Distances

* 60 km (37 miles) ESE (103°) from West Yellowstone, M


There was another one as well, but it hasn't been listed...



posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 12:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Telafree
 



There were three that registered on GEE, so that sounds correct.



posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 01:03 PM
link   
my firefox addon just corrected itself from 3.1 to 3.4...good...its on it...



posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 01:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Telafree
 


Listed as 3.6 on USGS, also could you post the link for the addon for firefox.

Cheers.






[edit on 2/1/2009 by who-me?]



posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 01:05 PM
link   
Sorry if I sound like I am repeating myself
But I think we have passed the half way point to the top and it gets thinner in depth at the top.
It maybe that we do not have to wait 4 more days to see something if they keep being 3'+s and moving north.



posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 01:06 PM
link   
looks really shallow. hmmm



posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 01:07 PM
link   
I'm looking at TA.HI7A but I don't know what BHE, BHN and BHZ are - does anyone else know

and what are you all looking at besides this on GEE?


oooh another



posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 01:07 PM
link   
I completely agree! Have been quietly watching from the start. You are all to be commended for your hard work!



posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 01:08 PM
link   
I think another relevant one just occurred on TA H18. TA H17 is not reporting yet, though.

[edit on 2009/1/2 by Shirakawa]



posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 01:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by trusername

I'm looking at TA.HI7A but I don't know what BHE, BHN and BHZ are - does anyone else know

and what are you all looking at besides this on GEE?


oooh another




Wow.

2nd line
*at a loss for words*



new topics

top topics



 
510
<< 116  117  118    120  121  122 >>

log in

join