posted on Jan, 25 2009 @ 02:52 PM
This thread is a GOOD question. In this time, 2009, I MUST ADMIT, that any and every "evidence" presented to me, would be immediately met (to me)
with SUSPICION because of what we are capable of with technology, deception, psychological operations, etc, VERSUS the year 1974, (or '78) for
example. Meaning, when I was watching Stan Friedman with Jesse Marcel on 'In Search Of', and Marcel was providing a piece of non-foldable foil on
there, I'd be like, "Oo there it is, the spaceship evidence." But if a piece of non-foldable Roswell "spaceship" foil were to be bantied about
now----I would be immediately suspicious.
There is a history in ufology, of people --enhancing-- their ufo story. For example, it is (all be-it --believed--) that people like Billy Meir and
George Adamski, truly did have anomalous encounters from something--- but expounded, (ahem) because an experiencer might say, "I need to MAKE people
--know-- what I now KNOW, and the ends justify the means. < Examples of that, --might-- be the Bill Moores and Richard Dotys of
ufology. Too.
So that, if a piece of FOR EXAMPLE hard evidence of the Roswell spaceship crash, were to be presented now, or even further and farther away in time,
from the incident, I would immediately say that someone is doing what is described in my above previous paragraph.
Look at what YOU all do EVERY TIME a ufo photo comes out. You say, "is that photoshopped?"
If spaceships were hovering above all the cities, like a Hollywood movie, I'd say, "is that Project Blue Beam?"