posted on Jul, 21 2009 @ 01:58 AM
This is an utterly ridiculous
AND TOTALLY MISLEADING TITLE for this post originating in
12/8/2008 and I'm surprised that no one who
responded to this nonsense actually read the friggin' article
EVIDENTLY!!!
Let's see...the title given by the "sharp" "detail oriented" op is.....
US gun company Constitution Arms says its guns for elderly will be subsidised
But the title given in the article's link states....
New gun for seniors ***could*** be subsidized by Medicare
rawstory.com...
*my emphasis
And my goodness!!!!! look at what the last two sentences of the referenced article have to say...
The FDA said it had not yet approved the gun.
"At this time, there have been no formal designations of the Palm Pistol by the FDA as a medical device," a spokeswoman said.
rawstory.com...
Originally posted by Shere Khaan
Wow. Does it feel good knowing that dollars for health care are going towards arming elderly and disabled people?
Wow! does it feel good knowing that you
DELIBERATELY misrepresented the information presented in the article just so you could promote your
personal crusade of bullscat against a issue that
DOES NOT EVEN RELATE TO AUSTRALIA???
Just because you all "down under" did not have "the stones" to protect your rights to self defense with the use of a firearm without submitting
yourselves to an excess of "hoop jumping" and "governmental bootlicking", please don't attempt to foist your flaccid-dink policies on my country.
If that is the way in which you wish to roll in your "neck of the woods" fine.
We have a saying over here...
DON'T PISS DOWN MY BACK AND TELL ME IT'S RAINING!
I really don't see anyone from the United States within the confines of ATS attempting to push their personal agendas on Australia. Do you think
perhaps it is within your power to reciprocate?