It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
From Bloomberg:
Smaller firms are emerging from the wreckage of the world’s largest financial companies, which are conserving capital following more than $1.2 trillion of writedowns and credit losses since the start of 2007. They’re luring traders with a shot at $500,000 commissions for two days’ work as banks that accepted federal bailouts retrench and slash bonuses.
Right.
Its called a partnership, where your skin is in the game and when you screw up, you eat it.
This is distinct from where you tap the "capital markets" with public stock offerings, install boards that can ignore shareholders, have 90% of your float held by mutual funds that get BJs from hookers hired by the boards, and as such are free to pay out all of the firm's equity (and more) in bonuses while the traders make decisions that only work for a short time, then blow the company to hell.
Prime examples of "doing it wrong" are Tanzillo at Countryside, Bear Stearns, AIG, Lehman, and the ultimate "writ large" idiocy of having risk divorced from reward, Fannie and Freddie.
In a partnership this sort of nonsense doesn't happen because the partners are the ones with their nuts on the line, and those become roasted chestnuts if they allow something stupid to happen.
So they don't.
This is how those "geniuses" should be working - either as partners or under partners who have a very keen eye for risk, because it is their checkbook and house in the Hamptons that is backing and at risk if the "cowboys" go off the reservation.
I am all about people taking risk - innovation is how we became a great nation, and there's nothing wrong with it not only in industry but also in finance - but you cannot allow risk-taking where the person taking the risk is divorced from the person who bears the consequence when the bet goes bad.
Originally posted by redhatty
We are teh generation who gets to watch as our government completely disregards the Constitution and becomes a self-sustaining monster that is out to kill us all
Geithner Seeks Broad Power To Seize Firms
The Obama administration will ask Congress to give the Treasury secretary unprecedented powers to initiate the seizure of non-bank financial companies, such as large insurers, investment firms and hedge funds, whose collapse would damage the broader economy, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said this morning.
Originally posted by stander
Originally posted by redhatty
We are teh generation who gets to watch as our government completely disregards the Constitution and becomes a self-sustaining monster that is out to kill us all
Geithner Seeks Broad Power To Seize Firms
The Obama administration will ask Congress to give the Treasury secretary unprecedented powers to initiate the seizure of non-bank financial companies, such as large insurers, investment firms and hedge funds, whose collapse would damage the broader economy, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said this morning.
There is nothing in the Constitution that empowers the private sector to seek loopholes in every guideline issued by government regulators to keep operations save and prudent. The greed-causing financial anarchy loves to protect itself by the same lines that you use to defend the rotten practices that created this mess.
The government should have continued to look the other way after Lehman A-holes came in begging. But the Feds didn't have a policy and infrastructure to bypass the financial clog and keep supplying the economy with government money. Instead, they pumped money into a rotten system deviced by the greed. There is no much difference between a dude asking for a quarter to "get something to eat" just to have enough to buy him a dime of crack and AIG execs getting high on bonuses paid by those fearing lay-offs.
Just keep defending this crap . . .
Where are the pitchforks???
The Federal Reserve will start purchasing long-term Treasuries tomorrow, aiming to bring down borrowing costs employing tools last used in the 1960s.
The first operation in the $300 billion effort is aimed at notes maturing from February 2016 to February 2019, the New York Fed Bank said in a statement today. In the coming nine days, the central bank plans to buy debt maturing between March 2011 and February 2039, according to the tentative schedule.
The purchases are part of Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke’s campaign to end the recession and stamp out the risk of deflation. Policy makers announced the step last week along with a plan to more than double purchases of housing debt to $1.45 trillion, hoping to reduce rates on home loans.