It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Worried that welfare costs are rising as the number of taxpayers declines, state Rep. John LaBruzzo, R-Metairie, said Tuesday he is studying a plan to pay poor women $1,000 to have their Fallopian tubes tied.
LaBruzzo said he worries that people receiving government aid such as food stamps and publicly subsidized housing are reproducing at a faster rate than more affluent, better-educated people who presumably pay more tax revenue to the government. He said he is gathering statistics no
"What I'm really studying is any and all possibilities that we can reduce the number of people that are going from generational welfare to generational welfare, " he said.
He said his program would be voluntary. It could involve tubal ligation, encouraging other forms of birth control or, to avoid charges of gender discrimination, vasectomies for men.
Originally posted by sc2099
If you can't afford to have kids, and realize this but can't afford to have this operation, this sort of program seems like a good option. It's voluntary, and IMO seems like $1000 well spent.
Thoughts? Opinions?
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
If women can consciously decide to have children to extend their welfare
Originally posted by saturnine_sweet
Let them watch themselves and the people like them starve and die as a consequence of their own actions, and maybe they will think first before breeding.
Originally posted by ANoNyMiKE
I think this is a good idea but they should pay the women a little more coin. Since they are "poor" I think they should do a little more to help them get on their feet; $1000 is hardly first and last months rent for a tiny one bedroom apartment. Besides, if they did have that child and had to ask the government for support, it would cost one hell of a lot more money that a grand! The government seems to be getting a way better deal when you look at it like that.
It is possible to reverse the operation as well so they could collect the money , reverse the operation and then ask the government for money down the road. IMO this is a better idea:
- $10,000
- Mother signs a legally binding agreement that effectively makes her ineligible to collect monetary assistance from the government to assist in raising any children she may have at a later date. She may still reverse it later in life if she can better afford to raise children, but the government will not help her do so.
- Some of her eggs are removed and kept in a cold storage bank so she may have children at a time down the road when she is financially secure through artificial insemination and implantation.
Originally posted by saturnine_sweet
How about we just make these people be responsible for their actions, and stop propping them and their hordes of children up with welfare, just because they don't have the self-control or intelligence to stop whoring about. Let them watch themselves and the people like them starve and die as a consequence of their own actions, and maybe they will think first before breeding. You certainly can't get rid of a cancer by feeding it!
If I should choose to help the less fortunate, that's my right. But I have NO obligation to do so. They made their choices, let them reap what they sow. A helping hand to get someone back on their feet is one thing...but a crutch that spans generations is sickening. The last thing we need to do is throw more money at them!