It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by reject
I hate to be the one starting this but if its a real bigfoot, wouldn't that throw the biggest monkey wrench into creationism? This would be the smoking gun missing link. [...]
Now we may have this too that is directly related to us.
Originally posted by dave420
reply to post by AlexG141989
We already have the missing links. The "where is the missing link?" argument was from the 70s, before we had categorised the dozens of hominid apes that nicely flesh out our side of the global animal tree. We don't need Bigfoot to prove or disprove anything - science takes care of that And it's doing a great job so far.
Originally posted by dave420
reply to post by AlexG141989
We already have the missing links. The "where is the missing link?" argument was from the 70s, before we had categorised the dozens of hominid apes that nicely flesh out our side of the global animal tree. We don't need Bigfoot to prove or disprove anything - science takes care of that And it's doing a great job so far.
Originally posted by reject
They say the platypus is strong evidence for evolution. Now we may have this too that is directly related to us.
Originally posted by iamcamouflage
reply to post by reject
Who needs Bigfoot? There is all ready plenty of evidence to disprove ID and creationism.
Originally posted by dave420
reply to post by Valhall
It doesn't screw up the taxonomy at all. The platypus is a great demonstration of a dwindling part of the evolutionary tree. How it is a last vestage of a previous time when mammals were not all live-birth, nipple-having, lip-having, non-toxic creatures.
Originally posted by Valhall
Originally posted by reject
They say the platypus is strong evidence for evolution. Now we may have this too that is directly related to us.
I'm extremely curious as to how the platypus is strong evidence for evolution - considering it really screws up the taxonomy tree.
I'm also curious as to how a bigfoot would screw up anything at all. But then I'm not a fatalist, so maybe I'm missing the apocalyptic facet of this.
Originally posted by dave420
Is that all you have? You clearly have NO IDEA of the theory of evolution,
if you feel it proper to say such nonsense in a public setting. You are harming your cause by continuing to spout such utter nonsense.
Is that all you have? You clearly have NO IDEA of the theory of evolution,
Unlike you, I'm confident in what I know.
Your logic, and indeed your argument, is pathetic. You embrace the science that doesn't point out the obvious flaws in your religious beliefs, then somehow, in your twisted intellect, manage to shun the exact same logic and methodology that casts massive, massive doubts on that which your loved ones and religious figures have crammed down your neck throughout your life, since it was first concocted back in the Bronze Age (not really an age given to scientific insight, but you seem to think so).