It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Nearly everyone carries a cell phone and it’s hard to find one without that camera feature. It’s convenient when you want to take that impromptu photo, but a Tri-Cities area man ended up behind bars after snapping a shot of a Johnson County sheriff’s deputy during a traffic stop.
The cell phone photographer says the arrest was intimidation, but the deputy says he feared for his life.
“Here’s a guy who takes me out of the car and arrests me in front of my kids. For what? To take a picture of a police officer?” said Scott Conover.
The American Civil Liberties Union would not comment on Conover’s case without fully reviewing the allegations, but told us there is no law that prohibits anyone from taking photographs in public areas, even of police. Taking photos is protected by the First Amendment. Conover is ordered to appear in a Johnson County court on August 6th.
Originally posted by DimensionalDetective
LMAO...What da?
Now taking a picture of a cop is grounds for arrest?!?
The thing that creeps me out about this, is just think if folks HADN'T taken film of some past events of officers bullying and intimidating people. This sounds like a way to intimidate the public into not keeping an eye on LE.
The American Civil Liberties Union would not comment on Conover’s case without fully reviewing the allegations, but told us there is no law that prohibits anyone from taking photographs in public areas, even of police. Taking photos is protected by the First Amendment. Conover is ordered to appear in a Johnson County court on August 6th.
www.tricities.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by Simon_Boudreaux
I wonder why the man photographed the officer in the first place? What was going on that he felt he needed to take a picture? It isn't illegal to take a picture of an LEO but what was going on that he took the pic?. After reading the article it looks to me like another case of someone did something a cop didn't like so the officer made up charges to arrest the man because he wouldn't delete the picture after being asked 3 times. There's more to this story that isn't being told.
Once this gentleman goes to court and the charges are dropped(unless the judge is in with the LEO's) will anything happen to the officer?
Originally posted by DJMessiah
I can understand why the officer would fear for his life. Some police officers will not pose for a camera, or speak with a new reporter, for fear that some criminal they arrested in the past will trace their information and find where they and their family live.