It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PeaceUk
I still don't believe the government would do this to it's own citizens.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
So that implies that the govt did the 9/11 attacks.
Where is your proof that the govt performed these attacks?
Are for real? How old are you, for real?
I never stated the government performed the attacks, there is not enough evidnece of that. BUT there is enough evidence that the governemnt had plenty of warnings about the attacks.
Just like the government had warnings of the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
You do realize that aircraft build up huge static charges in flight right?
Originally posted by darkbluesky
1) Who was behind the attacks?
2) What were the goals of the attacks?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Zaphod58
You do realize that aircraft build up huge static charges in flight right?
Well i do not know about airliners but the military planes i worked on had static dischargers so they did not build up static charges in flight.
Originally posted by Maya432
reply to post by PeaceUk
your sure the government wouldn`t do this to their own people...huh?
there is something mounted on the bottom of the plane....
and in both planes hits you can see a flash comming from
the front of the object just before impact.....what is it???
Originally posted by Shotabel
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Zaphod58
You do realize that aircraft build up huge static charges in flight right?
Well i do not know about airliners but the military planes i worked on had static dischargers so they did not build up static charges in flight.
Well I tend to go with the theory of it being the aluminum particles that are bursting into a flash of fiery light. My own reasoning for this is the video of the F4 crashing into the cement barrier(Im sure we have all seen before). If you watch this video again you see these same exact very fast explosions. I would encourage anyone bothered by that anomaly to research that hypothesis.
911review.com... 9-11 Review explains it well with links to technical sites.
www.jokeroo.com... -Link to video of F4 vs wall video (first impact sequence (rt to lt impact) shows the best imo)
Originally posted by W35M4N
There is no doubt in my mind that the towers were brought down only by planes, whether the US government let it happen is still up for debate but I don't believ that either. Yet.
Well why do so many reports state that the towers withstood the plane impacts and only the fires brought down the towers?
But then as other reports state no steel buidling has ever collapsed from fire no matter how severe.
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
Which reports state only the fires brought the towers down? None of the reports state that. .
Several reports i have shown state that the buildings withstood the plane impacts and only the fires caused the collapse. In fact the NIST report is the only report that states it was combination of plane impacts and fire.
I have also shown several steel buildings that had longer lasting fires and more structural damage then the towers and building 7 and did not collapse.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by Maya432
Uhm...... That's United 175 thanks. There are no pictures of AA 11 impacting the tower. The only video of it is the Naudet brothers. The tail isn't in shadow, it's painted blue because that's the color of United.
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
Incorrect. the FEMA report, and 911 commission report also state it was not "just the fire" that brought the buildings down. The plane impacts were also a key component in the collapses.
Can you tell us the model of airliners that flew into those buildings? Were they 757 or 767s? Otherwise, you are comparing apples to oranges again.
Wrong, i have already shown the FEMA report that states the building withstood the plane impacts and only the fire caused the collapse.
The structural damage sustained by each tower from the impact, combined with the ensuing fires, resulted in the total collapse of each building.
I will repeat it again since you seem to have a hard time reading my post.
I have posted several steel buildings that had longer lasting fires AND MORE STRUCTURAL DAMAGE THEN THE TOWERS OR BUIDLING 7 AND STILL DID NOT COLLAPSE.